A small proton charge radius from an electron-proton scattering experiment.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
17
06
2019
accepted:
19
09
2019
entrez:
8
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
7
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Elastic electron-proton scattering (e-p) and the spectroscopy of hydrogen atoms are the two methods traditionally used to determine the proton charge radius, r
Identifiants
pubmed: 31695211
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2
pii: 10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147-150Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Pohl, R. et al. The size of the proton. Nature 466, 213–216 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature09250
Mohr, P. J., Taylor, B. N. & Newell, D. B. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 633–730 (2008).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.633
Beyer, A. et al. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 358, 79–85 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aah6677
Fleurbaey, H. New measurement of the 1S–3S transition frequency of hydrogen: contribution to the proton charge radius puzzle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183001 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.183001
Bernauer, J. C. et al. High-precision determination of the electric and magnetic form factors of the proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 242001 (2010).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.242001
Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B. & Taylor, B. N. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 45, 043102 (2016).
doi: 10.1063/1.4954402
Antognini, A. et al. Proton structure from the measurement of 2S–2P transition frequencies of muonic hydrogen. Science 339, 417–420 (2013).
doi: 10.1126/science.1230016
Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B. & Taylor, B. N. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. http://physics.nist.gov/constants (2019).
Hasan, N. et al. Computing the nucleon charge and axial radii directly at Q
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.034504
Mohr, P. J., Taylor, B. N. & Newell, D. B. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527–1605 (2012).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1527
Carlson, C. E. The proton radius puzzle. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 59–77 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.01.002
Liu, Y. S. & Miller, G. A. Validity of the Weizsäcker–Williams approximation and the analysis of beam dump experiments: production of an axion, a dark photon, or a new axial-vector boson. Phys. Rev. D 96, 016004 (2017).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.016004
Miller, G. A. Defining the proton radius: a unified treatment. Phys. Rev. C 99, 035202 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035202
Miller, G. A. Proton polarizability contribution: muonic hydrogen Lamb shift and elastic scattering. Phys. Lett. B 718, 1078–1082 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.016
Antognini, A. et al. Theory of the 2S–2P Lamb shift and 2S hyperfine splitting in muonic hydrogen. Ann. Phys. 331, 127–145 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2012.12.003
Lee, G., Arrington, J. R. & Hill, R. J. Extraction of the proton radius from electron–proton scattering data. Phys. Rev. D 92, 013013 (2015).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.013013
Higinbotham, D. W. et al. Proton radius from electron scattering data. Phys. Rev. C 93, 055207 (2016).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.055207
Griffioen, K., Carlson, C. & Maddox, S. Consistency of electron scattering data with a small proton radius. Phys. Rev. C 93, 065207 (2016).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.065207
Gasparian, A. et al. High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius. Proposal to Jefferson Lab, PAC-38 C12-11-106 https://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/proposals/11/PR12-11-106.pdf (2011).
Gasparian, A. A high performance hybrid electromagnetic calorimeter at Jefferson Lab. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Calorimetry in Particle Physics (eds Cecchi, C. et al.) 109–115 (World Scientific, 2005).
Mecking, B. et al. The CEBAF large acceptance spectrometer (CLAS). Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 503, 513–553 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01001-5
Agostinelli, S. et al. GEANT4: a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250–303 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
Akushevich, I., Gao, H., Ilyichev, A. & Meziane, M. Radiative corrections beyond the ultra relativistic limit in unpolarized ep elastic and Møller scatterings for the PRad experiment at Jefferson Laboratory. Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 1 (2015).
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15001-8
Gramolin, A. V. et al. A new event generator for the elastic scattering of charged leptons on protons. J. Phys. G Nucl. Phys. 41, 115001 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/41/11/115001
Christy, M. E. & Bosted, P. E. Empirical fit to precision inclusive electron–proton cross-sections in the resonance region. Phys. Rev. C 81, 055213 (2010).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.055213
Kelly, J. J. Simple parametrization of nucleon form factors. Phys. Rev. C 70, 068202 (2004).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.068202
Venkat, S., Arrington, J., Miller, G. A. & Zhan, X. Realistic transverse images of the proton charge and magnetic densities. Phys. Rev. C 83, 015203 (2011).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.015203
Higinbotham, D. W. & McClellan, R. E. How analytic choices can affect the extraction of electromagnetic form factors from elastic electron scattering cross section data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08185 (2018).
Yan, X. et al. Robust extraction of the proton charge radius from electron–proton scattering data. Phys. Rev. C 98, 025204 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.025204
Alarcón, J. M., Higinbotham, D. W., Weiss, C. & Ye, Z. Proton charge radius from electron scattering data using dispersively improved chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C 99, 044303 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044303