Distinct individual differences in default mode network connectivity relate to off-task thought and text memory during reading.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 11 2019
Historique:
received: 25 03 2019
accepted: 21 10 2019
entrez: 9 11 2019
pubmed: 9 11 2019
medline: 11 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Often, as we read, we find ourselves thinking about something other than the text; this tendency to mind-wander is linked to poor comprehension and reduced subsequent memory for texts. Contemporary accounts argue that periods of off-task thought are related to the tendency for attention to be decoupled from external input. We used fMRI to understand the neural processes that underpin this phenomenon. First, we found that individuals with poorer text-based memory tend to show reduced recruitment of left middle temporal gyrus in response to orthographic input, within a region located at the intersection of default mode, dorsal attention and frontoparietal networks. Voxels within these networks were taken as seeds in a subsequent resting-state study. The default mode network region (i) had greater connectivity with medial prefrontal cortex, falling within the same network, for individuals with better text-based memory, and (ii) was more decoupled from medial visual regions in participants who mind-wandered more frequently. These findings suggest that stronger intrinsic connectivity within the default mode network is linked to better text processing, while reductions in default mode network coupling to the visual system may underpin individual variation in the tendency for our attention to become disengaged from what we are reading.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31700143
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52674-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-52674-9
pmc: PMC6838089
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

16220

Références

Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82
pubmed: 3375398
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):1053-1062
pubmed: 27485462
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-320
pubmed: 21875246
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:35-46
pubmed: 26562053
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):460-70
pubmed: 20146593
J Psycholinguist Res. 2012 Aug;41(4):311-21
pubmed: 22113486
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15230-9
pubmed: 26586812
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):1002-15
pubmed: 15809000
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):596-601
pubmed: 21460338
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):2516-2524
pubmed: 29901789
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 May;29(5):581-93
pubmed: 17557297
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):648-63
pubmed: 23965122
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 4;37(1):141-151
pubmed: 28053037
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):579-88
pubmed: 17604651
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Sep;128(3):309-331
pubmed: 10513398
Neuroreport. 1997 Mar 24;8(5):1305-10
pubmed: 9175134
PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97176
pubmed: 24824880
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 20;8:447
pubmed: 24999322
Neuroimage. 2004 Feb;21(2):623-31
pubmed: 14980565
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):992-7
pubmed: 21547521
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:61-72
pubmed: 23684863
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Sci Stud Read. 2014;18(5):325-346
pubmed: 36733663
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):286-301
pubmed: 18407525
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;21(6):786-9
pubmed: 20554601
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov;20(11):2728-38
pubmed: 20190005
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1083-94
pubmed: 19583477
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 05;11(4):e0152272
pubmed: 27045292
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Apr;16(4):234-44
pubmed: 25783611
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Mar;32:114-20
pubmed: 24534479
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87
pubmed: 18026167
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 12;26(28):7328-36
pubmed: 16837579
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):254-62
pubmed: 21592844
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50
pubmed: 18927032
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jul;7(7):293-299
pubmed: 12860187
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55
pubmed: 27881854
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):3057-66
pubmed: 20965253
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12574-12579
pubmed: 27791099
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):724-39
pubmed: 15904540
Psychol Rev. 1994 Jul;101(3):371-95
pubmed: 7938337
Child Neuropsychol. 2009 May;15(3):232-46
pubmed: 18629674
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1024
pubmed: 25566039
Brain. 1999 Oct;122 ( Pt 10):1839-50
pubmed: 10506087
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1261-9
pubmed: 15635062
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:19-31
pubmed: 27908787
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):343-61
pubmed: 16876436
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:286-299
pubmed: 30266263
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Feb;13(2):170-7
pubmed: 12507948
Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 23;10(1):3816
pubmed: 31444333
Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
pubmed: 23607430
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2432-8
pubmed: 20467871
Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):162-85
pubmed: 9522683
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:487-518
pubmed: 25293689
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Dec;17(12):2899-913
pubmed: 17372276
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:99-109
pubmed: 29031531
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Sep;5(3):263-81
pubmed: 16396089
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1348-55
pubmed: 23892552
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):219-24
pubmed: 15831406
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Nov-Dec;36(6):556-63
pubmed: 15493437
Brain Res Bull. 2001 Feb;54(3):287-98
pubmed: 11287133
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):363-8
pubmed: 21333539
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:393-401
pubmed: 29339310
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 12;7:734
pubmed: 24282397
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Aug;24(8):1766-78
pubmed: 22621260
Elife. 2015 Apr 13;4:e06481
pubmed: 25866927
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jun;11(3):325-40
pubmed: 11339984
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;32(41):14433-41
pubmed: 23055513
Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1599-612
pubmed: 12414298
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:487-496
pubmed: 30447291
Neuroimage. 2017 Sep;158:1-11
pubmed: 28655631
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9318-9323
pubmed: 30150393
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723
J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 28;33(35):14031-9
pubmed: 23986239
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):458-69
pubmed: 18004943
Nat Methods. 2011 Jun 26;8(8):665-70
pubmed: 21706013
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(11):1167-76
pubmed: 11527554
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1329-49
pubmed: 18838044

Auteurs

Meichao Zhang (M)

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. mz1180@york.ac.uk.

Nicola Savill (N)

School of Psychological and Social Sciences, York St John University, York, YO31 7EX, UK.

Daniel S Margulies (DS)

Frontlab, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 7225, Institut du cerveau et de la moelle épinière (ICM), 75013, Paris, France.

Jonathan Smallwood (J)

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Elizabeth Jefferies (E)

Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH