Establishing core outcome sets for gastrointestinal recovery in studies of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction: protocol for a nested methodological study.
Ileus
core outcome set
small bowel obstruction
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
26
08
2019
accepted:
08
10
2019
pubmed:
9
11
2019
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
9
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gastrointestinal recovery describes the restoration of normal bowel function in patients with bowel disease. This may be prolonged in two common clinical settings: postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction. Improving gastrointestinal recovery is a research priority but researchers are limited by variation in outcome reporting across clinical studies. This protocol describes the development of core outcome sets for gastrointestinal recovery in the contexts of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction. An international Steering Group consisting of patient and clinician representatives has been established. As overlap between clinical contexts is anticipated, both outcome sets will be co-developed and may be combined to form a common output with disease-specific domains. The development process will comprise three phases, including definition of outcomes relevant to postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction from systematic literature reviews and nominal-group stakeholder discussions; online-facilitated Delphi surveys via international networks; and a consensus meeting to ratify the final output. A nested study will explore if the development of overlapping outcome sets can be rationalized. The final output will be registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative. A multi-faceted, quality improvement campaign for the reporting of gastrointestinal recovery in clinical studies will be launched, targeting international professional and patient groups, charitable organizations and editorial committees. Success will be explored via an updated systematic review of outcomes 5 years after registration of the core outcome set.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
459-464Informations de copyright
Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Références
Scarborough JE, Schumacher J, Kent KC, Heise CP, Greenberg CC. Associations of specific postoperative complications with outcomes after elective colon resection: a procedure-targeted approach toward surgical quality improvement. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: e164681.
Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 1-9.
Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C et al. Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg 2014; 101: e9-22.
Tiernan J, Cook A, Geh I et al. Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 965-75.
Chapman SJ, Wells CI. Challenges in ileus research. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20: 639.
Chapman SJ, Thorpe G, Vallance AE et al. Systematic review of definitions and outcome measures for return of bowel function after gastrointestinal surgery. BJS Open 2018; 3: 1-10.
Mellor K, Hind D, Lee MJ. A systematic review of outcomes reported in small bowel obstruction research. J Surg Res 2018; 229: 41-50.
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials 2017; 18: 280.
Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG et al. Core Outcome Set- STAndards for Development: the COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002447.
Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG et al. Core Outcome Set- STAndards for Reporting: the COS-STAR statement. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002148.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 395-400.
Boers M, Kirwan JR, Gossec L et al. How to choose core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT 11 approves filter 2.0. J Rheumatol 2014; 41: 1025-30.
Lever J, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Points of significance: principal component analysis. Nat Methods 2017; 14: 641-42.
SAS Statistics. Principal component analysis. http://support.sas.com/publishing/pubcat/chaps/55129.pdf (accessed June 2019).
Comrey A, Lee H. A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1992.