Influence of Preoperative Tibiotalar Alignment in the Coronal Plane on the Survival of Total Ankle Replacement: A Systematic Review.

ankle osteoarthritis implant survival systematic review tibiotalar alignment total ankle arthroplasty total ankle replacement

Journal

Foot & ankle international
ISSN: 1944-7876
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9433869

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 9 11 2019
medline: 23 12 2020
entrez: 9 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It remains controversial whether significant preoperative tibiotalar varus and valgus deformity should be contraindications for total ankle replacement (TAR). The primary aim of this systematic review was to analyze the influence of preoperative tibiotalar varus and valgus alignment on the survival of TAR. The databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from onset through September 2018. Two authors performed study selection and data extraction using a predefined data extraction tool. Implant survival in the alignment groups was reported as "revisions per 100 component years." Additional procedures, complications, and revisions were also reported. Assessment of the methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In total, 17 studies were considered eligible, in which a total of 1692 TARs were included from 1627 patients. The weighted mean follow-up was 52.4 (range, 1-147) months. The neutral alignment group included 711 TARs, the varus group included 545 TARs, and the valgus group included 332 TARs. Total revisions were 52, 37, and 36 in the preoperative tibiotalar neutral, varus, and valgus alignment groups, respectively. Revisions per 100 observed component years were 1.6, 1.7, and 2.5 in the preoperative tibiotalar neutral, varus, and valgus alignment groups, respectively. A total of 129 complications and 447 additional procedures were reported in 601 TARs. There was a strong indication that preoperative varus alignment in the coronal plane had a comparable implant survival to neutral alignment. Preoperative valgus alignment demonstrated a more negative influence on implant survival. Level III, systematic review.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
It remains controversial whether significant preoperative tibiotalar varus and valgus deformity should be contraindications for total ankle replacement (TAR). The primary aim of this systematic review was to analyze the influence of preoperative tibiotalar varus and valgus alignment on the survival of TAR.
METHODS
The databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched from onset through September 2018. Two authors performed study selection and data extraction using a predefined data extraction tool. Implant survival in the alignment groups was reported as "revisions per 100 component years." Additional procedures, complications, and revisions were also reported. Assessment of the methodological quality was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
RESULTS
In total, 17 studies were considered eligible, in which a total of 1692 TARs were included from 1627 patients. The weighted mean follow-up was 52.4 (range, 1-147) months. The neutral alignment group included 711 TARs, the varus group included 545 TARs, and the valgus group included 332 TARs. Total revisions were 52, 37, and 36 in the preoperative tibiotalar neutral, varus, and valgus alignment groups, respectively. Revisions per 100 observed component years were 1.6, 1.7, and 2.5 in the preoperative tibiotalar neutral, varus, and valgus alignment groups, respectively. A total of 129 complications and 447 additional procedures were reported in 601 TARs.
CONCLUSION
There was a strong indication that preoperative varus alignment in the coronal plane had a comparable implant survival to neutral alignment. Preoperative valgus alignment demonstrated a more negative influence on implant survival.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, systematic review.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31701769
doi: 10.1177/1071100719886817
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

160-169

Auteurs

Dave R de Keijzer (DR)

Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Boudijn S H Joling (BSH)

Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Inger N Sierevelt (IN)

Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Daniël Hoornenborg (D)

Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Gino M M J Kerkhoffs (GMMJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports (ACHSS) AMC/VUmc IOC Research Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Daniël Haverkamp (D)

Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research & Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH