Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUN-LMP): Still a meaningful histo-pathological grade category for Ta, noninvasive bladder tumors in 2019?


Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 01 08 2019
revised: 23 09 2019
accepted: 02 10 2019
pubmed: 11 11 2019
medline: 7 5 2021
entrez: 10 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUN-LMP) was introduced as a noninvasive, noncancerous lesion and a separate grade category in 1998. Subsequently, PUN-LMP was reconfirmed by World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 and WHO 2016 classifications for urothelial bladder tumors. To analyze the proportion of PUN-LMP diagnosis over time and to determine its prognostic value compared to Ta-LG (low-grade) and Ta-HG (high-grade) carcinomas. To assess the intraobserver variability of an experienced uropathologist assigning (WHO) 2004/2016 grades at 2 time points. Individual patient data of 3,311 primary Ta bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were available. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed with cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression stratified by institution. Intraobserver variability was assessed by examining the same 314 transurethral resection of the tumorslides twice, in 2004 and again in 2018. PUN-LMP represented 3.8% (127/3,311) of Ta tumors. The same pathologist found 71/314 (22.6%) PUN-LMPs in 2004 and only 20/314 (6.4%) in 2018. Overall, the proportion of PUN-LMP diagnosis substantially decreased over time from 31.3% (1990-2000) to 3.2% (2000-2010) and to 1.1% (2010-2018). We found no difference in time to recurrence between the three WHO 2004/2016 Ta-grade categories (log-rank, P = 0.381), nor for LG vs. PUN-LMP (log-rank, P = 0.238). Time to progression was different for all grade categories (log-rank, P < 0.001), but not between LG and PUN-LMP (log-rank, P = 0.096). Multivariable analyses on recurrence and progression showed similar results for all 3 grade categories and for LG vs. PUN-LMP. The proportion of PUN-LMP has decreased to very low levels in the last decade. Contrary to its reconfirmation in the WHO 2016 classification, our results do not support the continued use of PUN-LMP as a separate grade category in Ta tumors because of the similar prognosis for PUN-LMP and Ta-LG carcinomas.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUN-LMP) was introduced as a noninvasive, noncancerous lesion and a separate grade category in 1998. Subsequently, PUN-LMP was reconfirmed by World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 and WHO 2016 classifications for urothelial bladder tumors.
OBJECTIVES
To analyze the proportion of PUN-LMP diagnosis over time and to determine its prognostic value compared to Ta-LG (low-grade) and Ta-HG (high-grade) carcinomas. To assess the intraobserver variability of an experienced uropathologist assigning (WHO) 2004/2016 grades at 2 time points.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Individual patient data of 3,311 primary Ta bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were available. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed with cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression stratified by institution. Intraobserver variability was assessed by examining the same 314 transurethral resection of the tumorslides twice, in 2004 and again in 2018.
RESULTS
PUN-LMP represented 3.8% (127/3,311) of Ta tumors. The same pathologist found 71/314 (22.6%) PUN-LMPs in 2004 and only 20/314 (6.4%) in 2018. Overall, the proportion of PUN-LMP diagnosis substantially decreased over time from 31.3% (1990-2000) to 3.2% (2000-2010) and to 1.1% (2010-2018). We found no difference in time to recurrence between the three WHO 2004/2016 Ta-grade categories (log-rank, P = 0.381), nor for LG vs. PUN-LMP (log-rank, P = 0.238). Time to progression was different for all grade categories (log-rank, P < 0.001), but not between LG and PUN-LMP (log-rank, P = 0.096). Multivariable analyses on recurrence and progression showed similar results for all 3 grade categories and for LG vs. PUN-LMP.
CONCLUSIONS
The proportion of PUN-LMP has decreased to very low levels in the last decade. Contrary to its reconfirmation in the WHO 2016 classification, our results do not support the continued use of PUN-LMP as a separate grade category in Ta tumors because of the similar prognosis for PUN-LMP and Ta-LG carcinomas.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31704141
pii: S1078-1439(19)30401-6
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

440-448

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anouk E Hentschel (AE)

Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Bas W G van Rhijn (BWG)

Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: basvanrhijn@hotmail.com.

Johannes Bründl (J)

Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Eva M Compérat (EM)

Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, UPMC Paris VI, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Karin Plass (K)

EAU Guidelines Office Board, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Oscar Rodríguez (O)

Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Jose D Subiela Henríquez (JDS)

Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Virginia Hernández (V)

Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Enrique de la Peña (E)

Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Isabel Alemany (I)

Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Diana Turturica (D)

Urology Clinic, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Francesca Pisano (F)

Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Urology Clinic, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Francesco Soria (F)

Urology Clinic, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Otakar Čapoun (O)

Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic.

Lenka Bauerová (L)

Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic.

Michael Pešl (M)

Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic.

H Max Bruins (HM)

Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Willemien Runneboom (W)

Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Sonja Herdegen (S)

Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Johannes Breyer (J)

Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Antonin Brisuda (A)

Urology,Teaching Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

Andrea Scavarda-Lamberti (A)

Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain.

Ana Calatrava (A)

Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain.

José Rubio-Briones (J)

Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain.

Maximilian Seles (M)

Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Sebastian Mannweiler (S)

Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Judith Bosschieter (J)

Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Venkata R M Kusuma (VRM)

Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital-NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.

David Ashabere (D)

Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital-NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Nicolai Huebner (N)

Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Juliette Cotte (J)

Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Laura S Mertens (LS)

Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Daniel Cohen (D)

Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Luca Lunelli (L)

Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, UPMC Paris VI, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Olivier Cussenot (O)

Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, UPMC Paris VI, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Soha El Sheikh (SE)

Pathology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Dimitrios Volanis (D)

Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Jean-François Coté (JF)

Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Morgan Rouprêt (M)

Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Andrea Haitel (A)

Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Urology,Teaching Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

A Hugh Mostafid (AH)

Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital-NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen (JA)

Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Richard Zigeuner (R)

Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Jose L Dominguez-Escrig (JL)

Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain.

Jaromir Hacek (J)

Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

Alexandre R Zlotta (AR)

Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Maximilian Burger (M)

Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Matthias Evert (M)

Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa (CA)

Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Antoine G van der Heijden (AG)

Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Lambertus A L M Kiemeney (LALM)

Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Viktor Soukup (V)

Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic.

Luca Molinaro (L)

Pathology, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Paolo Gontero (P)

Urology Clinic, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Carlos Llorente (C)

Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Ferran Algaba (F)

Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Joan Palou (J)

Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

James N'Dow (J)

EAU Guidelines Office Board, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Marko Babjuk (M)

Urology,Teaching Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Theo H van der Kwast (TH)

Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Richard J Sylvester (RJ)

EAU Guidelines Office Board, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH