Real-world practice patterns in veterans with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Castration resistant Metastatic Practice patterns Prostate cancer Real world

Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 19 09 2018
revised: 25 09 2019
accepted: 28 09 2019
pubmed: 11 11 2019
medline: 28 4 2021
entrez: 10 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is incurable, with most patients surviving less than 3 years. However, many treatments that extend survival have been approved in the past decade. To describe the patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in a cohort of Veterans diagnosed with mCRPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We identified 3,637 Veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 2006 and August 2015 with evidence of mCRPC through December 2016. We described the most commonly used systemic mCRPC treatments according to mCRPC diagnosis era: Epoch 1 (2006-2010) or Epoch 2 (2011-2016). Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns were examined using descriptive statistics. An unadjusted Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median time to biochemical progression and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals. The median age at initial prostate cancer diagnosis was 68 years. Approximately 67% of patients were non-Hispanic white, 29% were black, and 4% were other/unknown. A high-risk Gleason score (8-10) was reported in 748 (67%) of patients in Epoch 1 and 1578 (63%) of patients in Epoch 2, and the median prostate-specific antigen level at initial prostate cancer diagnosis was higher in Epoch 1 patients than in Epoch 2 patients (68 vs. 35 ng/ml). Following mCRPC diagnosis, the most common first-line therapies in Epoch 1 patients were docetaxel (83%) and abiraterone (9%), whereas Epoch 2 patients mainly received abiraterone (47%), docetaxel (36%), and enzalutamide (15%). In Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 patients, the median time to biochemical progression (unadjusted) was 9 and 13 months, respectively, and the median OS (unadjusted) was 15 and 23 months, respectively. The introduction of new therapies has resulted in increased use of the noncytotoxic agents abiraterone and enzalutamide as first-line treatment in lieu of docetaxel. Our results suggest that more recently diagnosed patients (Epoch 2) have a delayed time to biochemical progression and longer OS (unadjusted) compared with patients diagnosed earlier (Epoch 1).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is incurable, with most patients surviving less than 3 years. However, many treatments that extend survival have been approved in the past decade.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in a cohort of Veterans diagnosed with mCRPC in the Veterans Health Administration.
DESIGN
We identified 3,637 Veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 2006 and August 2015 with evidence of mCRPC through December 2016. We described the most commonly used systemic mCRPC treatments according to mCRPC diagnosis era: Epoch 1 (2006-2010) or Epoch 2 (2011-2016). Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns were examined using descriptive statistics. An unadjusted Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median time to biochemical progression and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
The median age at initial prostate cancer diagnosis was 68 years. Approximately 67% of patients were non-Hispanic white, 29% were black, and 4% were other/unknown. A high-risk Gleason score (8-10) was reported in 748 (67%) of patients in Epoch 1 and 1578 (63%) of patients in Epoch 2, and the median prostate-specific antigen level at initial prostate cancer diagnosis was higher in Epoch 1 patients than in Epoch 2 patients (68 vs. 35 ng/ml). Following mCRPC diagnosis, the most common first-line therapies in Epoch 1 patients were docetaxel (83%) and abiraterone (9%), whereas Epoch 2 patients mainly received abiraterone (47%), docetaxel (36%), and enzalutamide (15%). In Epoch 1 and Epoch 2 patients, the median time to biochemical progression (unadjusted) was 9 and 13 months, respectively, and the median OS (unadjusted) was 15 and 23 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The introduction of new therapies has resulted in increased use of the noncytotoxic agents abiraterone and enzalutamide as first-line treatment in lieu of docetaxel. Our results suggest that more recently diagnosed patients (Epoch 2) have a delayed time to biochemical progression and longer OS (unadjusted) compared with patients diagnosed earlier (Epoch 1).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31704142
pii: S1078-1439(19)30378-3
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.027
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1.e1-1.e10

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ahmad S Halwani (AS)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.

Kelli M Rasmussen (KM)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: kelli.rasmussen@hsc.utah.edu.

Vikas Patil (V)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Catherine C Li (CC)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Christina M Yong (CM)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Zachary Burningham (Z)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Sumati Gupta (S)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.

Sujata Narayanan (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, FL.

Shih-Wen Lin (SW)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, FL.

Susheela Carroll (S)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, FL.

Shivani K Mhatre (SK)

Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, FL.

Julie N Graff (JN)

Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Center, Portland, OR.

Robert Dreicer (R)

University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA.

Brian C Sauer (BC)

George E. Wahlen Veterans Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH