A generalized Stark effect electromodulation model for extracting excitonic properties in organic semiconductors.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 11 2019
08 11 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2019
accepted:
15
10
2019
entrez:
10
11
2019
pubmed:
11
11
2019
medline:
11
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Electromodulation (EM) spectroscopy, a powerful technique to monitor the changes in polarizability p and dipole moment u of materials upon photo-excitation, can bring direct insight into the excitonic properties of materials. However, extracting Δp and Δu from the electromodulation spectrum relies on fitting with optical absorption of the materials where optical effect in different device geometries might introduce large variation in the extracted values. Here, we demonstrate a systematic electromodulation study with various fitting approaches in both commonly adopted reflection and transmission device architectures. Strikingly, we have found that the previously ascribed continuum state threshold from the deviation between the measured and fitting results is questionable. Such deviation is found to be caused by the overlooked optical interference and electrorefraction effect. A generalized electromodulation model is proposed to incorporate the two effects, and the extracted Δp and Δu have excellent consistency in both reflection and transmission modes in all organic film thicknesses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31704917
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13081-w
pii: 10.1038/s41467-019-13081-w
pmc: PMC6841700
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5089Références
Nat Mater. 2017 May;16(5):551-557
pubmed: 28218921
J Am Chem Soc. 2009 Apr 8;131(13):4795-807
pubmed: 19292445
Nat Nanotechnol. 2016 Oct;11(10):900-906
pubmed: 27454879
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Feb 8;111(5):1213-21
pubmed: 17266277
Adv Mater. 2018 Oct;30(42):e1705600
pubmed: 29707823
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 11;9(1):4214
pubmed: 30310072
J Phys Chem Lett. 2019 Jun 20;10(12):3205-3211
pubmed: 31117683
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Jul 1;137(25):8192-8
pubmed: 26037526
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1995 May 15;51(20):14199-14206
pubmed: 9978347
Nat Mater. 2017 Jan;16(1):115-120
pubmed: 27698354
Adv Mater. 2010 Aug 10;22(30):3293-7
pubmed: 20517871
Adv Mater. 2017 Jun;29(22):
pubmed: 28370454
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Mar 7;134(9):4142-52
pubmed: 22309185
Nano Lett. 2014;14(4):2168-74
pubmed: 24635762
J Phys Chem B. 2019 Feb 21;123(7):1527-1536
pubmed: 30668130
Adv Mater. 2017 May;29(20):
pubmed: 28036127
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Aug 8;140(31):9996-10008
pubmed: 30008210
Adv Mater. 2014 Jul 9;26(26):4413-30
pubmed: 24677495
J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Feb 6;135(5):1806-15
pubmed: 23289621
Nat Nanotechnol. 2015 Jun;10(6):491-6
pubmed: 25938570
Nat Commun. 2014;5:3245
pubmed: 24488203
Science. 2014 Jan 31;343(6170):512-6
pubmed: 24336568
Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1989 Nov 15;40(14):9751-9759
pubmed: 9991496
J Phys Chem Lett. 2017 Sep 21;8(18):4557-4564
pubmed: 28880565
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Dec 21;133(50):20468-75
pubmed: 22077184
Adv Mater. 2013 May 7;25(17):2434-9
pubmed: 23418056