Prediction of mortality in adult patients with sepsis using six biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biomarker Meta-analysis Mortality Prognosis Sepsis Systematic review

Journal

Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 14 07 2019
accepted: 25 10 2019
entrez: 10 11 2019
pubmed: 11 11 2019
medline: 11 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and 2 (Ang-2), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (sRAGE), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM1), and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) have shown promising results for predicting all-cause mortality in critical care patients. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic value of these biomarkers for mortality in adult patients with sepsis. A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, for articles in English published from 01.01.1990 onwards, was conducted. The systematic review focused exclusively on observational studies of adult patients with sepsis, any randomized trials were excluded. For the meta-analysis, only studies which provide biomarker concentrations within 24 h of admission in sepsis survivors and nonsurvivors were included. Results are presented as pooled mean differences (MD) between nonsurvivors and survivors with 95% confidence interval for each of the six biomarkers. Studies not included in the quantitative analysis were narratively summarized. The risk of bias was assessed in all included studies using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. The systematic literature search retrieved 2285 articles. In total, we included 44 studies in the qualitative analysis, of which 28 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean differences in biomarker concentration (nonsurvivors - survivors), measured at onset of sepsis, are listed as follows: (1) Ang-1: - 2.9 ng/ml (95% CI - 4.1 to - 1.7, p < 0.01); (2) Ang-2: 4.9 ng/ml (95% CI 2.6 to 7.1, p < 0.01); (3) HMGB1: 1.2 ng/ml (95% CI 0.0 to 2.4, p = 0.05); (4) sRAGE: 1003 pg/ml (95% CI 628 to 1377, p < 0.01); (5) sTREM-1: 87 pg/ml (95% CI 2 to 171, p = 0.04); (6) suPAR: 5.2 ng/ml (95% CI 4.5 to 6.0, p < 0.01). Ang-1, Ang-2, and suPAR provide beneficial prognostic information about mortality in adult patients with sepsis. The further development of standardized assays and the assessment of their performance when included in panels with other biomarkers may be recommended. Trial registration This study was recorded on PROSPERO, prospective register of systematic reviews, under the registration ID: CRD42018081226.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and 2 (Ang-2), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (sRAGE), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM1), and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) have shown promising results for predicting all-cause mortality in critical care patients. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic value of these biomarkers for mortality in adult patients with sepsis.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, for articles in English published from 01.01.1990 onwards, was conducted. The systematic review focused exclusively on observational studies of adult patients with sepsis, any randomized trials were excluded. For the meta-analysis, only studies which provide biomarker concentrations within 24 h of admission in sepsis survivors and nonsurvivors were included. Results are presented as pooled mean differences (MD) between nonsurvivors and survivors with 95% confidence interval for each of the six biomarkers. Studies not included in the quantitative analysis were narratively summarized. The risk of bias was assessed in all included studies using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.
RESULTS RESULTS
The systematic literature search retrieved 2285 articles. In total, we included 44 studies in the qualitative analysis, of which 28 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean differences in biomarker concentration (nonsurvivors - survivors), measured at onset of sepsis, are listed as follows: (1) Ang-1: - 2.9 ng/ml (95% CI - 4.1 to - 1.7, p < 0.01); (2) Ang-2: 4.9 ng/ml (95% CI 2.6 to 7.1, p < 0.01); (3) HMGB1: 1.2 ng/ml (95% CI 0.0 to 2.4, p = 0.05); (4) sRAGE: 1003 pg/ml (95% CI 628 to 1377, p < 0.01); (5) sTREM-1: 87 pg/ml (95% CI 2 to 171, p = 0.04); (6) suPAR: 5.2 ng/ml (95% CI 4.5 to 6.0, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Ang-1, Ang-2, and suPAR provide beneficial prognostic information about mortality in adult patients with sepsis. The further development of standardized assays and the assessment of their performance when included in panels with other biomarkers may be recommended. Trial registration This study was recorded on PROSPERO, prospective register of systematic reviews, under the registration ID: CRD42018081226.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31705327
doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0600-1
pii: 10.1186/s13613-019-0600-1
pmc: PMC6841861
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

125

Références

Crit Care. 2008;12(1):201
pubmed: 18226173
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):144-9
pubmed: 24120089
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010314
pubmed: 27178971
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 19;6:39481
pubmed: 27991579
Cytokine. 2015 Jun;73(2):213-8
pubmed: 25794660
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 22;10(10):e0141251
pubmed: 26492036
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300
pubmed: 28114553
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R89
pubmed: 20482750
J Crit Care. 2016 Apr;32:9-15
pubmed: 26726794
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Jan;57(1):111-7
pubmed: 26632390
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Crit Care. 2012 Aug 08;16(4):R149
pubmed: 22873681
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Sep;36(5):654-8
pubmed: 18853582
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785-1805
pubmed: 27683581
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 20;12:15
pubmed: 22264245
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417
pubmed: 28658587
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2013 Dec;73(8):650-60
pubmed: 24164543
Cytokine. 2011 Jan;53(1):29-34
pubmed: 20980161
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):440.e7-13
pubmed: 25541104
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
PLoS Med. 2006 Mar;3(3):e46
pubmed: 16417407
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):702-10
pubmed: 21242795
Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):485-9
pubmed: 16277737
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1418-28
pubmed: 22706919
Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15
pubmed: 20144219
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 12;16(1):559
pubmed: 27729010
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Oct;25(4):609-34
pubmed: 23034322
Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(3):578-86
pubmed: 26281323
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016 Jul 19;6(3):178-185
pubmed: 27766166
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):387-396
pubmed: 28099636
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1046-53
pubmed: 18297269
Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):564-73
pubmed: 15753748
Nature. 2001 Apr 26;410(6832):1103-7
pubmed: 11323674
Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):792-6
pubmed: 15818107
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):25
pubmed: 29514597
Shock. 2009 Apr;31(4):348-53
pubmed: 18791490
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 15;190(10):1081-2
pubmed: 25398103
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1388-1399
pubmed: 30051136
Biomark Insights. 2012;7:39-44
pubmed: 22550400
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):581-614
pubmed: 25932591
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 01;11:53
pubmed: 21356122
Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2799-804
pubmed: 17901841
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013 Mar;11(3):265-75
pubmed: 23458767
J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):183-90
pubmed: 20338589
Immunol Lett. 2009 Jun 30;125(1):65-71
pubmed: 19539650
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Oct-Dec;26(4):392-6
pubmed: 25607269
Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:641039
pubmed: 24672147
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):1945-52
pubmed: 23949703
Crit Care. 2012 Jan 16;16(1):R7
pubmed: 22248019
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 29;16(1):46
pubmed: 27473112
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014 Oct;10(10):1349-56
pubmed: 25142036
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(20):e878
pubmed: 25997069
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep;35(9):1567-74
pubmed: 19551369
Eur J Immunol. 2004 Jun;34(6):1503-12
pubmed: 15162419
Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):656-9
pubmed: 16456079
J Surg Res. 2008 Jun 1;147(1):79-83
pubmed: 17981300
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-6
pubmed: 23420236
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129450
pubmed: 26076027
Clin Biochem. 2013 Feb;46(3):225-9
pubmed: 23159293
Eur Cytokine Netw. 2010 Mar;21(1):19-26
pubmed: 20146986
Inflammation. 2012 Dec;35(6):1833-43
pubmed: 22798017
Crit Care. 2015 Oct 14;19:367
pubmed: 26463042
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Aug;33(8):1347-53
pubmed: 17525840
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259-72
pubmed: 26414292
Shock. 2015 Mar;43(3):212-21
pubmed: 25423128
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Feb;32(2):237-243
pubmed: 16450102
Cancer Lett. 2013 Jan 1;328(1):18-26
pubmed: 22922303
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):375-80
pubmed: 26615223
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;28:111-6
pubmed: 25263503
Biomarkers. 2017 Feb;22(1):63-69
pubmed: 27319606

Auteurs

Andreas Pregernig (A)

Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Mattia Müller (M)

Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Ulrike Held (U)

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.

Beatrice Beck-Schimmer (B)

Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zurich, Switzerland. beatrice.beckschimmer@uzh.ch.

Classifications MeSH