Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for intracerebral metastases of solid tumors (NepoMUC): a phase I dose escalation trial.
Cancer
Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy
Intracerebral metastasis
Maximum tolerated dose
Microsurgical resection
Neoadjuvant radiation therapy
Protocol
Stereotactic radiosurgery
Journal
Cancer communications (London, England)
ISSN: 2523-3548
Titre abrégé: Cancer Commun (Lond)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101723675
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2019
09 11 2019
Historique:
received:
09
06
2019
accepted:
01
11
2019
entrez:
11
11
2019
pubmed:
11
11
2019
medline:
27
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
More than 25% of patients with solid cancers develop intracerebral metastases. Aside of surgery, radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay in the treatment of intracerebral metastases. Postoperative fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) to the resection cavity of intracerebral metastases is a treatment of choice to reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, FSRT has to be delayed until a sufficient wound healing is attained; hence systemic therapy might be postponed. Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) might offer advantages over adjuvant FSRT in terms of better target delineation and an earlier start of systemic chemotherapy. Here, we conducted a study to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases. This is a single-center, phase I dose escalation study on neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases that will be conducted at the Klinikum rechts der Isar Hospital, Technical University of Munich. The rule-based traditional 3 + 3 design for this trial with 3 dose levels and 4 different cohorts depending on lesion size will be applied. The primary endpoint is the MTD for which no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occur. The adverse events of each participant will be evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 continuously during the study until the first follow-up visit (4-6 weeks after surgery). Secondary endpoints include local control rate, survival, immunological tumor characteristics, quality of life (QoL), CTCAE grade of late clinical, neurological, and neurocognitive toxicities. In addition to the intracerebral metastasis which is treated with neoadjuvant SRS and resection up to four additional intracerebral metastases can be treated with definitive SRS. Depending on the occurrence of DLT up to 72 patients will be enrolled. The recruitment phase will last for 24 months. Neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases offers potential advantages over postoperative SRS to the resection cavity, such as better target volume definition with subsequent higher efficiency of eliminating tumor cells, and lower damage to surrounding healthy tissue, and much-needed systemic chemotherapy could be initiated more rapidly. Trial registration The local ethical review committee of Technical University of Munich (199/18S) approved this study on September 05, 2018. This trial was registered on German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016613; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016613) on January 29, 2019.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
More than 25% of patients with solid cancers develop intracerebral metastases. Aside of surgery, radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay in the treatment of intracerebral metastases. Postoperative fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) to the resection cavity of intracerebral metastases is a treatment of choice to reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, FSRT has to be delayed until a sufficient wound healing is attained; hence systemic therapy might be postponed. Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) might offer advantages over adjuvant FSRT in terms of better target delineation and an earlier start of systemic chemotherapy. Here, we conducted a study to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases.
METHODS
This is a single-center, phase I dose escalation study on neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases that will be conducted at the Klinikum rechts der Isar Hospital, Technical University of Munich. The rule-based traditional 3 + 3 design for this trial with 3 dose levels and 4 different cohorts depending on lesion size will be applied. The primary endpoint is the MTD for which no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occur. The adverse events of each participant will be evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 continuously during the study until the first follow-up visit (4-6 weeks after surgery). Secondary endpoints include local control rate, survival, immunological tumor characteristics, quality of life (QoL), CTCAE grade of late clinical, neurological, and neurocognitive toxicities. In addition to the intracerebral metastasis which is treated with neoadjuvant SRS and resection up to four additional intracerebral metastases can be treated with definitive SRS. Depending on the occurrence of DLT up to 72 patients will be enrolled. The recruitment phase will last for 24 months.
DISCUSSION
Neoadjuvant SRS for intracerebral metastases offers potential advantages over postoperative SRS to the resection cavity, such as better target volume definition with subsequent higher efficiency of eliminating tumor cells, and lower damage to surrounding healthy tissue, and much-needed systemic chemotherapy could be initiated more rapidly. Trial registration The local ethical review committee of Technical University of Munich (199/18S) approved this study on September 05, 2018. This trial was registered on German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016613; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016613) on January 29, 2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31706337
doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0416-2
pii: 10.1186/s40880-019-0416-2
pmc: PMC6842524
doi:
Banques de données
DRKS
['DRKS00016613']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73Références
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2350-2359
pubmed: 29745035
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Jul;14(7):910-8
pubmed: 22544733
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2011;1(2):95-107
pubmed: 29296303
Front Oncol. 2016 Dec 21;6:261
pubmed: 28066717
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1037-44
pubmed: 19801201
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):899-906
pubmed: 24606851
N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 22;322(8):494-500
pubmed: 2405271
Clin Neurosurg. 2008;55:14-9
pubmed: 19248664
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20
pubmed: 19436029
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 May 1;47(2):291-8
pubmed: 10802351
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9
pubmed: 20171515
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):162-174
pubmed: 28391295
Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug;79(2):279-85
pubmed: 26528673
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):943-8
pubmed: 22494581
Cancer Radiother. 2015 Feb;19(1):3-9
pubmed: 25636729
J Neurooncol. 2017 Feb;131(3):611-618
pubmed: 28000105
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 May;11(5):352-63
pubmed: 21472002
J Neurooncol. 2005 Oct;75(1):5-14
pubmed: 16215811
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Nov;18(11):1429-34
pubmed: 21868230
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Jun;190(6):521-32
pubmed: 24715242
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1040-1048
pubmed: 28687375
Cancer. 1996 Oct 15;78(8):1781-8
pubmed: 8859192
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2319-2327
pubmed: 29696815
Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 Nov;24(6):679-86
pubmed: 22820413
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Jan;38(1):E3
pubmed: 25552283
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):65-72
pubmed: 23213105
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 10;29(2):134-41
pubmed: 21041710
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1049-1060
pubmed: 28687377
Biometrics. 1989 Sep;45(3):925-37
pubmed: 2790129
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
pubmed: 10655437
Cureus. 2017 Dec 26;9(12):e1987
pubmed: 29503781
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):436-442
pubmed: 29157748
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 02;8:424
pubmed: 30333959
JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1485-9
pubmed: 9809728
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;142:81-86
pubmed: 26816106
Ann Neurol. 1993 Jun;33(6):583-90
pubmed: 8498838