Deconstructing tissue engineered trachea: Assessing the role of synthetic scaffolds, segmental replacement and cell seeding on graft performance.
Animals
Bone Marrow Cells
/ metabolism
Cell Culture Techniques
Female
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Polyethylene Terephthalates
/ chemistry
Polyurethanes
/ chemistry
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Respiratory Mucosa
/ metabolism
Tissue Engineering
/ methods
Tissue Scaffolds
/ chemistry
Trachea
/ metabolism
Bone marrow mononuclear cells
Epithelialization
Syngeneic segmental tracheal transplantation
Synthetic PET/PU scaffold
Tissue engineered trachea graft
Journal
Acta biomaterialia
ISSN: 1878-7568
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 01 2020
15 01 2020
Historique:
received:
28
06
2019
revised:
04
11
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
pubmed:
11
11
2019
medline:
5
3
2021
entrez:
11
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ideal construct for tracheal replacement remains elusive in the management of long segment airway defects. Tissue engineered tracheal grafts (TETG) have been limited by the development of graft stenosis or collapse, infection, or lack of an epithelial lining. We applied a mouse model of orthotopic airway surgery to assess the impact of three critical barriers encountered in clinical applications: the scaffold, the extent of intervention, and the impact of cell seeding and characterized their impact on graft performance. First, synthetic tracheal scaffolds electrospun from polyethylene terephthalate / polyurethane (PET/PU) were orthotopically implanted in anterior tracheal defects of C57BL/6 mice. Scaffolds demonstrated complete coverage with ciliated respiratory epithelium by 2 weeks. Epithelial migration was accompanied by macrophage infiltration which persisted at long term (>6 weeks) time points. We then assessed the impact of segmental tracheal implantation using syngeneic trachea as a surrogate for the ideal tracheal replacement. Graft recovery involved local upregulation of epithelial progenitor populations and there was no evidence of graft stenosis or necrosis. Implantation of electrospun synthetic tracheal scaffold for segmental replacement resulted in respiratory distress and required euthanasia at an early time point. There was limited epithelial coverage of the scaffold with and without seeded bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs). We conclude that synthetic scaffolds support re-epithelialization in orthotopic patch implantation, syngeneic graft integration occurs with focal repair mechanisms, however epithelialization in segmental synthetic scaffolds is limited and is not influenced by cell seeding. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The life-threatening nature of long-segment tracheal defects has led to clinical use of tissue engineered tracheal grafts in the last decade for cases of compassionate use. However, the ideal tracheal reconstruction using tissue-engineered tracheal grafts (TETG) has not been clarified. We addressed the core challenges in tissue engineered tracheal replacement (re-epithelialization and graft patency) by defining the role of cell seeding with autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells, the mechanism of respiratory epithelialization and proliferation, and the role of the inflammatory immune response in regeneration. This research will facilitate comprehensive understanding of cellular regeneration and neotissue formation on TETG, which will permit targeted therapies for accelerating re-epithelialization and attenuating stenosis in tissue engineered airway replacement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31707085
pii: S1742-7061(19)30748-2
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.008
pmc: PMC7231426
mid: NIHMS1541993
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyethylene Terephthalates
0
Polyurethanes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-191Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K08 HL138460
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Cell Transplant. 2010;19(8):965-71
pubmed: 20447341
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:155-160
pubmed: 29287858
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010 Jan;42(1):1-4
pubmed: 19747565
J Invest Surg. 2012 Aug;25(4):227-34
pubmed: 22571688
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep;161(3):458-467
pubmed: 31035858
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2195-201
pubmed: 23821554
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013 Dec;49(6):1127-34
pubmed: 23927678
Biomaterials. 2010 Jan;31(3):461-6
pubmed: 19819008
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:982971
pubmed: 22523471
Transplantation. 2002 May 15;73(9):1420-5
pubmed: 12023619
Acta Biomater. 2016 Oct 1;43:3-13
pubmed: 27395828
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):49-55
pubmed: 26552897
Acta Biomater. 2017 Aug;58:113-121
pubmed: 28546133
J Vis Exp. 2019 Apr 1;(146):
pubmed: 30985752
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 Apr 15;5(3):323-7
pubmed: 18403327
J Clin Invest. 2011 Jun;121(6):2336-49
pubmed: 21606594
Am J Pathol. 2010 Jul;177(1):362-76
pubmed: 20522644
Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 Jan;24(1-2):135-144
pubmed: 28486019
Dis Model Mech. 2010 Sep-Oct;3(9-10):545-56
pubmed: 20699479
Biomacromolecules. 2019 Apr 8;20(4):1765-1776
pubmed: 30844253
Biofabrication. 2016 Oct 27;8(4):045015
pubmed: 27788126
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2017 Jul;163(3):400-404
pubmed: 28748482
J Clin Invest. 2007 Dec;117(12):3774-85
pubmed: 18060031
Transpl Immunol. 2016 Nov;39:66-73
pubmed: 27590486
Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec;127(12):E449-E457
pubmed: 28776693
Respir Res. 2012 Nov 22;13:107
pubmed: 23170909
Tissue Eng Part A. 2015 Jan;21(1-2):75-84
pubmed: 24980864
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Nov;125(11):873-885
pubmed: 27411362
Biomaterials. 2014 Jan;35(2):803-813
pubmed: 24161166
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011 Jan 31;175(1):153-63
pubmed: 21050897
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Sep;86(3):967-74; discussion 967-74
pubmed: 18721593
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019 May;128(5):391-400
pubmed: 30700095
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):47-9
pubmed: 12517468
Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1733-41
pubmed: 20562701
Biomaterials. 2015 Sep;62:106-15
pubmed: 26041482
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015 Jul-Aug;4(4):419-30
pubmed: 25727889