Re-evaluating the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in 73 Gavi countries: a modelling study.
Cohort Studies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disabled Persons
/ statistics & numerical data
Global Health
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Immunization Programs
/ economics
Models, Statistical
Program Evaluation
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Rotavirus Infections
/ economics
Rotavirus Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
06
06
2019
revised:
20
09
2019
accepted:
01
10
2019
entrez:
12
11
2019
pubmed:
12
11
2019
medline:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous studies have found rotavirus vaccination to be highly cost-effective in low-income countries. However, updated evidence is now available for several inputs (ie, rotavirus disease mortality rates, rotavirus age distributions, vaccine timeliness, and vaccine efficacy by duration of follow-up), new rotavirus vaccines have entered the market, vaccine prices have decreased, and cost-effectiveness thresholds have been re-examined. We aimed to provide updated cost-effectiveness estimates to inform national decisions about the new introduction and current use of rotavirus vaccines in Gavi countries. We calculated the potential costs and effects of rotavirus vaccination for ten successive birth cohorts in 73 countries previously and currently eligible for Gavi support, compared with no vaccination. We used a deterministic cohort model to calculate numbers of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases, outpatient visits, hospitalisations, and deaths between birth and 5 years, with and without rotavirus vaccination. We calculated treatment costs from the government and societal perspectives. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (discounted US$ per disability-adjusted life-year averted). Country-specific model input parameters were based on the scientific literature, published meta-analyses, and international databases. We ran deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses. Over the period 2018-27, rotavirus vaccination has the potential to prevent nearly 600 000 deaths in Gavi countries. Averted outpatient visits and hospitalisations could lead to treatment savings of approximately $484·1 million from the government perspective and $878·0 million from the societal perspective. The discounted dollars per disability-adjusted life-year averted has a very high probability (>90%) of being less than 0·5 times the gross domestic product per capita in 54 countries, and less than 1·0 times gross domestic product per capita in 63 countries. Rotavirus vaccination continues to represent good value for money across most Gavi countries despite lower rotavirus mortality estimates and more stringent willingness-to-pay thresholds. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have found rotavirus vaccination to be highly cost-effective in low-income countries. However, updated evidence is now available for several inputs (ie, rotavirus disease mortality rates, rotavirus age distributions, vaccine timeliness, and vaccine efficacy by duration of follow-up), new rotavirus vaccines have entered the market, vaccine prices have decreased, and cost-effectiveness thresholds have been re-examined. We aimed to provide updated cost-effectiveness estimates to inform national decisions about the new introduction and current use of rotavirus vaccines in Gavi countries.
METHODS
We calculated the potential costs and effects of rotavirus vaccination for ten successive birth cohorts in 73 countries previously and currently eligible for Gavi support, compared with no vaccination. We used a deterministic cohort model to calculate numbers of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases, outpatient visits, hospitalisations, and deaths between birth and 5 years, with and without rotavirus vaccination. We calculated treatment costs from the government and societal perspectives. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (discounted US$ per disability-adjusted life-year averted). Country-specific model input parameters were based on the scientific literature, published meta-analyses, and international databases. We ran deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses.
FINDINGS
Over the period 2018-27, rotavirus vaccination has the potential to prevent nearly 600 000 deaths in Gavi countries. Averted outpatient visits and hospitalisations could lead to treatment savings of approximately $484·1 million from the government perspective and $878·0 million from the societal perspective. The discounted dollars per disability-adjusted life-year averted has a very high probability (>90%) of being less than 0·5 times the gross domestic product per capita in 54 countries, and less than 1·0 times gross domestic product per capita in 63 countries.
INTERPRETATION
Rotavirus vaccination continues to represent good value for money across most Gavi countries despite lower rotavirus mortality estimates and more stringent willingness-to-pay thresholds.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31708147
pii: S2214-109X(19)30439-5
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30439-5
pmc: PMC7024955
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rotavirus Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1664-e1674Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 26;4(6):e6060
pubmed: 19557133
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930
pubmed: 27994285
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 May;9(5):565-72
pubmed: 12737740
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 14;10:253
pubmed: 20470426
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71
pubmed: 25530442
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(6):1582-94
pubmed: 24861846
J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;200 Suppl 1:S174-81
pubmed: 19817598
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 08;6(4):ofz117
pubmed: 31049363
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;12(2):136-41
pubmed: 22030330
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):1071-1078
pubmed: 30689799
J Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 1;215(11):1666-1672
pubmed: 28430997
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Apr;21(4):192-204
pubmed: 17612463
Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1405-1416
pubmed: 23582727
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2003 Jul;16(2):230
pubmed: 14741909
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):47
pubmed: 30634922
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24
pubmed: 25883405
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62 Suppl 2:S96-S105
pubmed: 27059362
J Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 15;192(10):1720-6
pubmed: 16235169
Vaccine. 2013 Jul 02;31 Suppl 3:C19-29
pubmed: 23777686
J Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 1;200 Suppl 1:S28-38
pubmed: 19817610
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 11;12(9):e0183392
pubmed: 28892480
Vaccine. 2017 Jun 8;35(26):3364-3386
pubmed: 28504193
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Nov;7(11):e1541-e1552
pubmed: 31607466
J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;192 Suppl 1:S114-9
pubmed: 16088794
Vaccine. 2012 Apr 27;30 Suppl 1:A7-14
pubmed: 22520139
Lancet. 2015 Jan 31;385(9966):430-40
pubmed: 25280870
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Jan;30(1 Suppl):S6-S10
pubmed: 21048524
Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):209-22
pubmed: 23680352
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Feb 1;88(5):49-64
pubmed: 23424730
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935
pubmed: 27987642
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2462-4
pubmed: 26122065
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):717-727
pubmed: 31178289