Diagnostic Performances of Tridimensional Rectosonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectosigmoid Endometriosis: A Prospective Cohort Study on 101 Patients.
Deep infiltrating endometriosis
Digestive endometriosis
Intestinal endometriosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
transvaginal ultrasonography
Journal
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
ISSN: 1879-291X
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2019
revised:
06
09
2019
accepted:
18
09
2019
pubmed:
12
11
2019
medline:
13
8
2021
entrez:
12
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tridimensional rectosonography (3-D RSG) is a transvaginal ultrasonography procedure combining intrarectal contrast with tridimensional technology. The objectives of this study were to assess the diagnostic performances of 3-D RSG in deep infiltrating rectosigmoid endometriosis using surgery and pathology as the gold standard, and to compare its results with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients referred for endometriosis with symptoms suggesting deep infiltrating intestinal endometriosis (DIE) were included if they agreed to undergo a 3-D RSG and MRI and if there was a surgical indication related to endometriosis. The study was a non-randomized monocentric prospective cohort study (Canadian task force classification Level II-2). From May 2012 to May 2017, 101 patients were included. Sixty patients (59.4%) had bowel involvement of the rectum (n = 21, 20.8%) or of the sigmoid (n = 39, 38.6%) confirmed in surgery and/or in pathologic testing. In the diagnosis of rectosigmoid DIE, 3-D RSG sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and κ index were 93%, 95%, 97%, 91%, 94% and 0.88, respectively. For MRI they were 87%, 90%, 93%, 82%, 88% and 0.76, respectively. The accuracy was not significantly different between 3-D RSG and MRI (p = 0.181). In conclusion, 3-D RSG is an effective technique to diagnose rectosigmoid endometriosis and seems to have similar diagnostic performances to MRI for this indication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31708272
pii: S0301-5629(19)31515-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.09.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
225-232Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.