Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Advanced Sarcoma and Neuroblastoma Pediatric Patients: Anti-cancer Treatment Preceding Monocyte Harvest Impairs the Immunostimulatory and Antigen-Presenting Behavior of DCs and Manufacturing Process Outcome.
anti-cancer medications
cell-based medicinal products
dendritic cells
investigator-initiated clinical trial
manufacturing outcome variability
neuroblastoma
sarcoma
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
07
2019
accepted:
24
09
2019
entrez:
12
11
2019
pubmed:
12
11
2019
medline:
12
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite efforts to develop novel treatment strategies, refractory and relapsing sarcoma, and high-risk neuroblastoma continue to have poor prognoses and limited overall survival. Monocyte-derived dendritic cell (DC)-based anti-cancer immunotherapy represents a promising treatment modality in these neoplasias. A DC-based anti-cancer vaccine was evaluated for safety in an academic phase-I/II clinical trial for children, adolescents, and young adults with progressive, recurrent, or primarily metastatic high-risk tumors, mainly sarcomas and neuroblastomas. The DC vaccine was loaded with self-tumor antigens obtained from patient tumor tissue. DC vaccine quality was assessed in terms of DC yield, viability, immunophenotype, production of IL-12 and IL-10, and stimulation of allogenic donor T-cells and autologous T-cells in allo-MLR and auto-MLR, respectively. Here, we show that the outcome of the manufacture of DC-based vaccine is highly variable in terms of both DC yield and DC immunostimulatory properties. In 30% of cases, manufacturing resulted in a product that failed to meet medicinal product specifications and therefore was not released for administration to a patient. Focusing on the isolation of monocytes and the pharmacotherapy preceding monocyte harvest, we show that isolation of monocytes by elutriation is not superior to adherence on plastic in terms of DC yield, viability, or immunostimulatory capacity. Trial patients having undergone monocyte-interfering pharmacotherapy prior to monocyte harvest was associated with an impaired DC-based immunotherapy product outcome. Certain combinations of anti-cancer treatment resulted in a similar pattern of inadequate DC parameters, namely, a combination of temozolomide with irinotecan was associated with DCs showing poor maturation and decreased immunostimulatory features, and a combination of pazopanib, topotecan, and MTD-based cyclophosphamide was associated with poor monocyte differentiation and decreased DC immunostimulatory parameters. Searching for a surrogate marker predicting an adverse outcome of DC manufacture in the peripheral blood complete blood count prior to monocyte harvest, we observed an association between an increased number of immature granulocytes in peripheral blood and decreased potency of the DC-based product as quantified by allo-MLR. We conclude that the DC-manufacturing yield and the immunostimulatory quality of anti-cancer DC-based vaccines generated from the monocytes of patients were not influenced by the monocyte isolation modality but were detrimentally affected by the specific combination of anti-cancer agents used prior to monocyte harvest.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31709173
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01034
pmc: PMC6823179
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1034Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Hlavackova, Pilatova, Cerna, Selingerova, Mudry, Mazanek, Fedorova, Merhautova, Jureckova, Semerad, Pacasova, Flajsarova, Souckova, Demlova, Sterba, Valik and Zdrazilova-Dubska.
Références
J Immune Based Ther Vaccines. 2007 May 03;5:7
pubmed: 17477875
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Sep 29;6(1):96
pubmed: 30268156
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017 Aug;34(5):308-319
pubmed: 29148865
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Nov;41(11):2032-8
pubmed: 9811059
J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Jan;13(1):125-35
pubmed: 18363835
Blood. 1996 Feb 15;87(4):1317-25
pubmed: 8608220
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):884
pubmed: 29268708
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013 Aug;62(8):1315-26
pubmed: 23666509
Exp Hematol. 2002 Oct;30(10):1115-23
pubmed: 12384141
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3487-93
pubmed: 10550146
Blood. 1995 May 1;85(9):2482-9
pubmed: 7537116
Rheumatol Int. 2002 Jun;22(2):60-7
pubmed: 12070677
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e71291
pubmed: 23936267
Blood. 1998 Jul 1;92(1):215-22
pubmed: 9639519
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39956
pubmed: 22768182
Oncol Lett. 2016 Sep;12(3):2139-2144
pubmed: 27602153
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176460
pubmed: 28445506
Radiographics. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):258-78
pubmed: 26761540
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015 Oct;64(10):1251-60
pubmed: 26105625
Br J Cancer. 2010 Oct 26;103(9):1369-79
pubmed: 20924375
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):46813-46831
pubmed: 27223079
RMD Open. 2017 Jul 13;3(1):e000365
pubmed: 28955481
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Jun;966:232-7
pubmed: 12114277
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 Dec;67(12):1919-1929
pubmed: 29748897
J Exp Med. 2017 Jul 3;214(7):1913-1923
pubmed: 28606987
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 1;22(13):3182-91
pubmed: 26823601
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Jun;17(6):349-362
pubmed: 28436425
Blood. 2000 Jan 1;95(1):270-6
pubmed: 10607712
J Immunol. 2005 Aug 1;175(3):1373-81
pubmed: 16034072
Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 May;14(5):302-14
pubmed: 24751955
Oncology. 2012;82(5):249-60
pubmed: 22538363
Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 1;67(1):26-31
pubmed: 17210680
J Immunother. 2004 Jan-Feb;27(1):27-35
pubmed: 14676631
Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 15;73(8):2480-92
pubmed: 23436796
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 10;26(14):2384-9
pubmed: 18467730
J Immunol Methods. 2003 Jul;278(1-2):283-92
pubmed: 12957415
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Oct 13;11:3009-3017
pubmed: 29075104
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 30;9:1726
pubmed: 30105020
Clin Exp Immunol. 2013 Jun;172(3):490-9
pubmed: 23600838