Parrots do not show inequity aversion.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 11 2019
11 11 2019
Historique:
received:
14
05
2019
accepted:
23
10
2019
entrez:
13
11
2019
pubmed:
13
11
2019
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inequity aversion, the negative reaction to unequal treatment, is considered a mechanism for stabilizing cooperative interactions between non-kin group members. However, this might only be adaptive for species that switch cooperative partners. Utilizing a comparative approach, inequity aversion has been assessed in many mammalian species and recently also in corvids and one parrot species, kea, revealing mixed results. To broaden our knowledge about the phylogenetic distribution of inequity aversion, we tested four parrot species in the token exchange paradigm. We varied the quality of rewards delivered to dyads of birds, as well as the effort required to obtain a reward. Blue-headed macaws and African grey parrots showed no reaction to being rewarded unequally. The bigger macaws were less willing to exchange tokens in the "unequal" condition compared to the "equal high" condition in which both birds obtained high quality rewards, but a closer examination of the results and the findings from the control conditions reveal that inequity aversion does not account for it. None of the species responded to inequity in terms of effort. Parrots may not exhibit inequity aversion due to interdependence on their life-long partner and the high costs associated with finding a new partner.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31712656
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52780-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-52780-8
pmc: PMC6848082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16416Références
Am J Primatol. 2009 Feb;71(2):175-81
pubmed: 19021260
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 09;8(10):e76297
pubmed: 24130767
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0133253
pubmed: 26266937
Am J Primatol. 2007 Apr;69(4):448-56
pubmed: 17146793
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 7;273(1592):1375-83
pubmed: 16777726
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12537
pubmed: 30135456
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):23-43
pubmed: 16553307
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 17;7(1):15802
pubmed: 29150666
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861):
pubmed: 28835562
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):291-303
pubmed: 26944218
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 15;4(3):160461
pubmed: 28405351
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 30;6:51
pubmed: 25688226
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2011;82(1):56-70
pubmed: 21625145
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505
pubmed: 17255008
Anim Cogn. 2017 Nov;20(6):1137-1146
pubmed: 28929247
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):253-8
pubmed: 15705549
Anim Behav. 2010 Jun 1;79(6):1229-1237
pubmed: 27011389
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1223-8
pubmed: 16720395
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Nov;129(4):339-46
pubmed: 26214033
Biol Lett. 2013 Mar 13;9(3):20121092
pubmed: 23485873
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):340-5
pubmed: 19064923
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):351-8
pubmed: 19777274
Anim Cogn. 2009 May;12(3):505-9
pubmed: 19184138
Am J Primatol. 2012 Feb;74(2):145-56
pubmed: 22038902
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56885
pubmed: 23437262
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18854-9
pubmed: 18000045
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):E1837
pubmed: 23564347
Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 19;27(12):1861-1865.e3
pubmed: 28602652
Front Neurosci. 2011 Apr 05;5:43
pubmed: 21519380
Biol Lett. 2011 Oct 23;7(5):680-2
pubmed: 21508022
Nature. 2003 Sep 18;425(6955):297-9
pubmed: 13679918
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):479-500
pubmed: 30105647
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 07;282(1808):20150392
pubmed: 25972467
Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):1251776
pubmed: 25324394