Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis.
Elasticity imaging techniques
Fibrosis
Liver cirrhosis
Magnetic resonance imaging
Spleen
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
16
07
2019
accepted:
19
09
2019
revised:
23
08
2019
pubmed:
13
11
2019
medline:
8
9
2020
entrez:
13
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the diagnostic performance, cut-off values, and optimal drive frequency range for staging hepatic fibrosis using tomoelastography by multifrequency MR elastography of the liver and spleen. This prospective study consecutively enrolled a total of 61 subjects between June 2014 and April 2017: 45 patients with chronic liver disease and proven stage of fibrosis and 16 healthy volunteers. Tomoelastography was performed at 1.5 T using six drive frequencies from 35 to 60 Hz. Cut-off values and AUC were calculated. Shear wave speed (in m/s) of the liver and spleen was assessed separately and in combination as a surrogate of stiffness. For compound multifrequency processing of the liver, cut-off and AUC values by fibrosis stage were as follows: F1, 1.52 m/s and 0.89; F2, 1.55 m/s and 0.94; F3, 1.67 m/s and 0.98; and F4, 1.72 m/s and 0.98. Diagnostic performance of the best single drive frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) was similar (mean AUC = 0.95, respectively). Combined analysis of the liver and spleen slightly improved performance at 60 Hz in F4 patients (mean AUC = 0.97 vs. 0.95, p = 0.03). Full-field-of-view elastograms displayed not only the liver and spleen but also small anatomical structures including the pancreas and major vessels. Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. Our analysis of single-frequency tomoelastography suggests that scan time can be further reduced in future studies, making tomoelastography easier to implement in clinical routine. • Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms of the abdomen with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Diagnostic performance of single-frequency tomoelastography at higher frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) and compound multifrequency processing are equivalent for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Combined assessment of hepatic and splenic stiffness slightly improves diagnostic performance for staging hepatic fibrosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31712963
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7
pmc: PMC7033143
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1719-1729Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : RE 4161/1-1
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : RE 4161/1-2
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : SFB 1340/1 Matrix in Vision
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : SFB 1340/1 Matrix in Vision
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : SFB 1340/1 Matrix in Vision
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
ID : SFB 1340/1 Matrix in Vision
Références
Invest Radiol. 2019 Apr;54(4):198-203
pubmed: 30444796
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5S):S103-S117
pubmed: 28473066
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1207-1213.e2
pubmed: 17916548
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196486
pubmed: 29698472
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jun;35(6):1356-64
pubmed: 22246952
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Mar;79(3):1325-1333
pubmed: 28585229
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):440-451.e6
pubmed: 25305349
Eur Radiol. 2016 May;26(5):1431-40
pubmed: 26314479
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Apr;40(4):818-34
pubmed: 24711064
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Sep;78(3):976-983
pubmed: 27699875
Med Image Anal. 2016 May;30:1-10
pubmed: 26845371
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Feb;39(2):298-306
pubmed: 23649541
Invest Radiol. 2019 Feb;54(2):89-97
pubmed: 30222647
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Jun;42(6):1289-94
pubmed: 26971462
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):738-763
pubmed: 29461949
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):122-7
pubmed: 19542403
Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):32-40
pubmed: 18471441
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):910-8
pubmed: 23912619
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):80-6
pubmed: 20679447
Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1208-14
pubmed: 22841289
J Biomech. 2014 May 7;47(7):1665-74
pubmed: 24657103
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jan;71(1):267-77
pubmed: 23413115
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Hepatology. 1994 Jun;19(6):1513-20
pubmed: 8188183
Invest Radiol. 2015 May;50(5):347-51
pubmed: 25599282