Preoperative risk score for prediction of long-term outcomes after hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Report of a collaborative, international-based, external validation study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ blood
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
CA-19-9 Antigen
/ blood
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ blood
Clinical Decision Rules
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukocyte Count
Lymphocyte Count
Male
Middle Aged
Neutrophils
Proportional Hazards Models
Serum Albumin
/ metabolism
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Burden
External validation
Intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Liver surgery
Long-term outcomes
Prognostic score
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
revised:
25
10
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
pubmed:
14
11
2019
medline:
27
10
2020
entrez:
14
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A preoperative risk score (PRS) to predict outcome of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by liver surgery could be clinically relevant.To assess accuracy for broadly adoption, external validation of predictive models on independent datasets is crucial. The objective of this study was to externally validate the score for prediction of long-term outcomes after liver surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma proposed by Sasaki et al. and based on preoperative albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocytes-ratio, CA19-9 and tumor size. Patients treated by liver surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at 11 international HPB centers from 2001 to 2018 were included in the external validation cohort. Harrell's c-index and Hosmer-Lemeshow analyses were used to test PRS discrimination and calibration. Kaplan-Meier curve for risk groups as described in the original study were displayed. A total of 355 patients with 174 deaths during the follow-up period (median = 41.7 months, IQR 32.8-50.6) were included. The median PRS value was 14.7 (IQR 10.7-20.6), with normal distribution across the cohort. A Cox regression on PRS covariates found coefficients similar to those of the derivation cohort, except for tumor size. Measures of discrimination estimated by Harrell's c-index was 0.61(95%CI:0.56-0.67) and Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.175. The Kaplan-Meyer estimation showed reasonable discrimination across risk groups, with 5years survival rate ranging from 20.1% to 0%. In this external validation cohort, the PRS had mild discrimination and poor calibration performance, similarly to the original publication. Nevertheless, its ability to identify different classes of risk is clinically useful, for a better tailoring of a therapeutic strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31718919
pii: S0748-7983(19)30921-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.041
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CA-19-9 Antigen
0
Serum Albumin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
560-571Investigateurs
Shinji Uemoto
(S)
Fabiano Perdigao
(F)
Francisco Nolasco
(F)
Sophie Laroche
(S)
Renato Romagnoli
(R)
Simone Famularo
(S)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.