Multiple simultaneous fractures are associated with higher all-cause mortality: results from a province-wide fracture liaison service.
Fracture liaison service
Fragility fracture
Mortality rates
Multiple fractures
Risk of death
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
27
05
2019
accepted:
23
10
2019
pubmed:
14
11
2019
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
14
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mortality rates in our fracture liaison service ranged from 2.7% at year 1 to 14.8% at year 5 post-screening. Presentation with multiple simultaneous fractures at screening was associated with higher risk of death. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group. To examine all-cause mortality rates in a provincial fracture liaison service (FLS) and the association between the index fracture type, particularly multiple simultaneous fractures, and the risk of death at follow-up. This cohort study includes fragility fracture patients aged 50+, enrolled in a provincial FLS in Ontario, Canada, between 2007 and 2010. All-cause mortality was assessed using administrative data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of death 5 years after screening. Crude mortality rates for 6543 fragility fracture patients were 2.7% at year 1, 5.6% at year 2, and 14.8% at year 5 after screening. After adjusting for age and sex, and relative to distal radius fracture, patients with multiple (simultaneous) fractures at screening had a higher risk of dying (HR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.3-2.4), followed by those with a hip fracture (HR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.3-1.8), a proximal humerus fracture (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.7), and other single fractures (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7). Having an index ankle fracture was not associated with the risk of death over a distal radius fracture. As compared to the 50-65 age group, patients 66 years and older had a higher risk of death (for 66-70 age group: HR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.9-3.3; for 71-80: HR = 4.3, 95%CI 3.5-5.4; and for 81+: HR = 10.6, 95%CI 8.7-13.0). Females had a lower risk of death (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.5-0.6) than males. Presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of higher risk of death relative to a distal radius fracture. This finding indicates the need for increased focus on this high-risk group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31720710
doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05207-z
pii: 10.1007/s00198-019-05207-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
291-296Références
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Feb;24(2):393-406
pubmed: 22829395
Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Feb;17(2):195-203
pubmed: 24576275
J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Apr;15(4):721-39
pubmed: 10780864
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):513-21
pubmed: 19190316
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Jun 25;10:1035-42
pubmed: 26150707
Ir J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;186(1):179-184
pubmed: 27059996
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):873-879
pubmed: 26650377
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Nov;27(11):3165-3175
pubmed: 27230521
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Aug;24(8):2135-52
pubmed: 23589162
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):1006-14
pubmed: 21289270
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Oct;27(10):2039-46
pubmed: 22836222
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2016 Dec;2(4):238-243
pubmed: 30775492
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):661-5
pubmed: 23140108
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):e29
pubmed: 24553898
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Mar;15(3):175-9
pubmed: 14691617
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198006
pubmed: 29856795
Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 4:S39-43
pubmed: 21939802
Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):236-42
pubmed: 26802076
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jul;22(7):2051-65
pubmed: 21607807
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Mar;11(1):52-60
pubmed: 23334619
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):863-869
pubmed: 27770155
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jan 29;148:w14579
pubmed: 29376552
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep;53(9):1476-82
pubmed: 16137275
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(12):2075-82
pubmed: 20162259