Physiotherapy rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fracture-a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation (PROVE trial).
Exercise therapy
Manual therapy
Osteoporosis
Physical therapy
Rehabilitation
Spinal fracture
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
03
06
2019
accepted:
14
08
2019
pubmed:
14
11
2019
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
14
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The trial compared three physiotherapy approaches: manual or exercise therapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT) for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s). At 1 year, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups meaning there is inadequate evidence to support manual or exercise therapy. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of different physiotherapy approaches for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s) (OVF). >Prospective, multicentre, adaptive, three-arm randomised controlled trial. Six hundred fifteen adults with back pain, osteoporosis, and at least 1 OVF participated. 7 individual physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks focused on either manual therapy or home exercise compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT). The co-primary outcomes were quality of life and back muscle endurance measured by the QUALEFFO-41 and timed loaded standing (TLS) test at 12 months. At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Mean QUALEFFO-41: - 1.3 (exercise), - 0.15 (manual), and - 1.2 (SSPT), a mean difference of - 0.2 (95% CI, - 3.2 to 1.6) for exercise and 1.3 (95% CI, - 1.8 to 2.9) for manual therapy. Mean TLS: 9.8 s (exercise), 13.6 s (manual), and 4.2 s (SSPT), a mean increase of 5.8 s (95% CI, - 4.8 to 20.5) for exercise and 9.7 s (95% CI, 0.1 to 24.9) for manual therapy. Exercise provided more quality-adjusted life years than SSPT but was more expensive. At 4 months, significant changes above SSPT occurred in endurance and balance in manual therapy, and in endurance for those ≤ 70 years, in balance, mobility, and walking in exercise. Adherence was problematic. Benefits at 4 months did not persist and at 12 months, we found no significant differences between treatments. There is inadequate evidence a short physiotherapy intervention of either manual therapy or home exercise provides long-term benefits, but arguably short-term benefits are valuable. ISRCTN 49117867.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31720722
doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05133-0
pii: 10.1007/s00198-019-05133-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
277-289Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585827
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 10/99/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585819
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_A620_1014
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 10.99.01
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12011/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0400491
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585824
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(11):881-7
pubmed: 22931434
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2831-2841
pubmed: 28689306
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD008618
pubmed: 23440829
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Nov;16(11):1321-9
pubmed: 15702262
J Physiother. 2014 Sep;60(3):151-6
pubmed: 25092418
Am J Med. 2016 Feb;129(2):221.e1-10
pubmed: 26524708
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Mar;20(3):481-9
pubmed: 18661090
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-44
pubmed: 30324412
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1897-905
pubmed: 20938766
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):557-566
pubmed: 29230511
J Gerontol. 1992 May;47(3):M93-8
pubmed: 1573190
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Dec;25(6):928-36
pubmed: 26542483
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Nov;67(11):1315-20
pubmed: 23184210
Trials. 2014 Jan 14;15:22
pubmed: 24422876
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb 17;11:36
pubmed: 20163739
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):241-6
pubmed: 15644764
Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-37
pubmed: 11856064
J Clin Densitom. 2016 Jan-Mar;19(1):29-34
pubmed: 26363627
Bone. 2002 Jun;30(6):836-41
pubmed: 12052450
Maturitas. 2010 Jun;66(2):206-11
pubmed: 20395080
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):43
pubmed: 28425085
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62
pubmed: 8437031
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 19;6:52
pubmed: 16623946
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:137
pubmed: 24113838
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Aug;14(8):677-82
pubmed: 12879220
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1531-1542
pubmed: 28168409
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Oct;18(10):1389-95
pubmed: 17572835
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):743-9
pubmed: 16696738
J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94
pubmed: 8126356
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Aug;27(8):2515-24
pubmed: 26984569
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Nov;29(11):2545-2556
pubmed: 30091064
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1863-71
pubmed: 21060992
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(11):914-22
pubmed: 11193243
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Oct;29(10):2210-6
pubmed: 24715607
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Mar 28;15:34
pubmed: 25888399
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Aug;25(8):2017-25
pubmed: 24807628
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):997-1004
pubmed: 12403738
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):129-35
pubmed: 20140408
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1471-8
pubmed: 15341548
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;31(2):169-191
pubmed: 29224695
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):893-905
pubmed: 29322223