Combined immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic uveal melanoma: a retrospective, multi-center study.
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
CTLA-4 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Female
Humans
Ipilimumab
/ therapeutic use
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Uveal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Biomarker
Combined immune checkpoint blockade
Ipilimumab
Nivolumab
Uveal melanoma
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 11 2019
13 11 2019
Historique:
received:
20
07
2019
accepted:
30
10
2019
entrez:
15
11
2019
pubmed:
15
11
2019
medline:
3
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Uveal melanoma (UM) is highly refractory to treatment with dismal prognosis in advanced stages. The value of the combined checkpoint blockade with CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in metastatic UM is currently unclear. Patients with metastatic or unresectable UM treated with ipilimumab in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor were collected from 16 German skin cancer centers. Patient records of 64 cases were analyzed for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Clinical parameters and serum biomarkers associated with OS and treatment response were determined with Cox regression modelling and logistic regression. The best overall response rate to combined checkpoint blockade was 15.6% with 3.1 and 12.5% complete and partial response, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.5 months (range 9.0-65.0). Stable disease was achieved in 21.9%, resulting in a disease control rate of 37.5% with a median duration of the clinical benefit of 28.0 months (range 7.0-65.0). The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6). The median OS was estimated to 16.1 months (95% CI 12.9-19.3). Regarding safety, 39.1% of treated patients experienced a severe, treatment-related adverse event according to the CTCAE criteria (grade 3: 37.5%; grade 4: 1.6%). The most common toxicities were colitis (20.3%), hepatitis (20.3%), thyreoiditis (15.6%), and hypophysitis (7.8%). A poor ECOG performance status was an independent risk factor for decreased OS (p = 0.007). The tolerability of the combined checkpoint blockade in UM may possibly be better than in trials on cutaneous melanoma. This study implies that combined checkpoint blockade represents the hitherto most effective treatment option available for metastatic UM available outside of clinical trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Uveal melanoma (UM) is highly refractory to treatment with dismal prognosis in advanced stages. The value of the combined checkpoint blockade with CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition in metastatic UM is currently unclear.
METHODS
Patients with metastatic or unresectable UM treated with ipilimumab in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor were collected from 16 German skin cancer centers. Patient records of 64 cases were analyzed for response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Clinical parameters and serum biomarkers associated with OS and treatment response were determined with Cox regression modelling and logistic regression.
RESULTS
The best overall response rate to combined checkpoint blockade was 15.6% with 3.1 and 12.5% complete and partial response, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.5 months (range 9.0-65.0). Stable disease was achieved in 21.9%, resulting in a disease control rate of 37.5% with a median duration of the clinical benefit of 28.0 months (range 7.0-65.0). The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.6). The median OS was estimated to 16.1 months (95% CI 12.9-19.3). Regarding safety, 39.1% of treated patients experienced a severe, treatment-related adverse event according to the CTCAE criteria (grade 3: 37.5%; grade 4: 1.6%). The most common toxicities were colitis (20.3%), hepatitis (20.3%), thyreoiditis (15.6%), and hypophysitis (7.8%). A poor ECOG performance status was an independent risk factor for decreased OS (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS
The tolerability of the combined checkpoint blockade in UM may possibly be better than in trials on cutaneous melanoma. This study implies that combined checkpoint blockade represents the hitherto most effective treatment option available for metastatic UM available outside of clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31722735
doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0800-0
pii: 10.1186/s40425-019-0800-0
pmc: PMC6854774
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
CTLA-4 Antigen
0
CTLA4 protein, human
0
Ipilimumab
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
299Références
Nature. 2013 Jul 11;499(7457):214-218
pubmed: 23770567
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;25(18):5513-5524
pubmed: 31227496
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5487-5496
pubmed: 27185375
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:56-65
pubmed: 28648699
Melanoma Res. 2019 Dec;29(6):561-568
pubmed: 30664106
J Transl Med. 2015 Nov 06;13:351
pubmed: 26541511
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1370-1380
pubmed: 31150059
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(8):1167-75
pubmed: 22119735
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2908-18
pubmed: 26787752
Nat Commun. 2018 May 14;9(1):1866
pubmed: 29760383
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 20;39(6):599-607
pubmed: 33125309
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492
pubmed: 30361170
Mol Cancer Res. 2018 Dec;16(12):1902-1911
pubmed: 30093564
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Cancer. 2016 Nov 15;122(21):3344-3353
pubmed: 27533448
Melanoma Res. 2016 Jun;26(3):300-3
pubmed: 26848796
Oncoimmunology. 2016 Feb 18;5(5):e1143997
pubmed: 27467964
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:41-51
pubmed: 30205280
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Jul;66(7):903-912
pubmed: 28391358
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jun;57:36-49
pubmed: 28550712
Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 22;9(48):28903-28909
pubmed: 29988983
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Apr;45:7-18
pubmed: 26922661
Melanoma Res. 2020 Feb;30(1):76-84
pubmed: 31095037
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jan;56(1):101-103
pubmed: 27911126
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 Jul;68(7):1179-1185
pubmed: 31175402
Case Rep Oncol Med. 2019 Apr 17;2019:3560640
pubmed: 31179139
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Nov;60:44-52
pubmed: 28881222