Design and Outcomes of a Novel Keratoprosthesis: Addressing Unmet Needs in End-Stage Cicatricial Corneal Blindness.


Journal

Cornea
ISSN: 1536-4798
Titre abrégé: Cornea
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8216186

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 15 11 2019
medline: 6 1 2021
entrez: 15 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The most commonly applied prosthetic devices for corneal blindness in the setting of severe cicatricial keratoconjunctivitis are the Boston keratoprosthesis type II and the modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis, with these requiring either normal eyelid skin or a healthy cuspid tooth, respectively. For patients with neither attribute, we developed a new keratoprosthesis device combining positive aspects of both Boston keratoprosthesis type II and modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis, which we have named the "Lux." Short-term postoperative outcomes for the Lux keratoprosthesis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), device retention, and complications, were examined in a retrospective case series of 9 eyes of 9 patients implanted at 4 centers. Seven of 9 (77.8%) eyes had cicatricial corneal blindness due to autoimmune disease and 2 (22.2%) from severe burns. Preoperative BCVA was ≤hand motions in all patients. Three (33.3%) had previously received at least 1 keratoprosthesis in the affected eye, and 4 (44.4%) had previously undergone ≥1 therapeutic keratoplasty. One patient had 19 previous eye surgeries. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 18.7 months (range 7-28 months). BCVA of ≥20/200 was achieved in all 9 patients, with 2 (22.2%) reaching 20/20 at the last examination, and all 9 (100%) of the devices were retained. One recipient developed a retinal detachment 2 months after implantation. Two (22.2%) patients required placement of a glaucoma drainage device. The Lux keratoprosthesis was developed for patients with severe cicatricial keratoconjunctivitis who were otherwise not candidates for existing keratoprosthesis designs. Short-term outcomes after implantation of the Lux keratoprosthesis were encouraging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31724985
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002207
pii: 00003226-202004000-00014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

484-490

Références

Dohlman CH, Schneider HA, Doane MG. Prosthokeratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:694–770.
Gonzalez-Andrades M, Sharifi R, Islam MM, et al. Improving the practicality and safety of artificial corneas: pre-assembly and gamma-rays sterilization of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Ocul Surf. 2018;16:322–330.
Pujari S, Siddique SS, Dohlman CH, et al. The Boston keratoprosthesis type II: the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary experience. Cornea. 2011;30:1298–1303.
Strampelli B. Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis [in Italian]. Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1963;89:1039–1044.
Hille K, Grabner G, Liu C, et al. Standards for modified osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) surgery according to Strampelli and Falcinelli: the Rome-Vienna protocol. Cornea. 2005;24:895–908.
Iyer G, Srinivasan B, Agarwal S, et al. Laminar resorption in modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis procedure: a cause for concern. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:263–269.e2.
Basu S, Pillai VS, Sangwan VS. Mucosal complications of modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis in chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:867–873.e2.
Michael R, Charoenrook V, de la Paz MF, et al. Long-term functional and anatomical results of osteo- and osteoodonto-keratoprosthesis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:1133–1137.
Charoenrook V, Michael R, de la Paz MF, et al. Comparison of long-term results between osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis. Ocul Surf. 2018;16:259–264.
Zhou C, Lei F, Chodosh J, et al. The role of titanium surface microtopography on adhesion, proliferation, transformation, and matrix deposition of corneal cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:1927–1938.
Belin MW, Guell JL, Grabner G. Suggested guidelines for reporting keratoprosthesis results: Consensus opinion of the Cornea Society, Asia Cornea Society, EuCornea, PanCornea, and the KPro Study Group. Cornea. 2016;35:143–144.
Iyer G, Srinivasan B, Agarwal S, et al. Bone augmentation of the osteo-odonto alveolar lamina in MOOKP—will it delay laminar resorption? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253:1137–1141.
Gilbert AL, Jakobiec FA, Chodosh J, et al. A comparison of retrokeratoprosthetic membrane and conjunctival inflammatory responses to silicone oil. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2014;4:15.
Avadhanam VS, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Bardan AS, et al. When there is no tooth—looking beyond the Falcinelli MOOKP. Ocul Surf. 2019;17:4–8.
Basu S, Sureka S, Shukla R, et al. Boston type 1 based keratoprosthesis (Auro KPro) and its modification (LVP KPro) in chronic Stevens Johnson syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013202756. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202756.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202756
Basu S, Nagpal R, Serna-Ojeda JC, et al. LVP keratoprosthesis: anatomical and functional outcomes in bilateral end-stage corneal blindness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018. pii: bjophthalmol-2017-311649. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311649. [epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311649
Iyer G, Srinivasan B, Agarwal S, et al. Structural & functional rehabilitation in eyes with lamina resorption following MOOKP—can the lamina be salvaged? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:781–790.
Salvador-Culla B, Jeong KJ, Kolovou PE, et al. Titanium coating of the Boston keratoprosthesis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5:17.
Yuan Z, Sun H, Yuan J. A 1-year study on carbon, titanium surface-modified intraocular lens in rabbit eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:1008–1013.
Bakshi SK, Paschalis EI, Graney J, et al. Lucia and beyond: development of an affordable keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2019;38:492–497.
Wagoner MD. Chemical injuries of the eye: current concepts in pathophysiology and therapy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1997;41:275–313.
Todani A, Ciolino JB, Ament JD, et al. Titanium back plate for a PMMA keratoprosthesis: clinical outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1515–1518.
Lee R, Khoueir Z, Tsikata E, et al. Long-term visual outcomes and complications of Boston keratoprosthesis type II implantation. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:27–35.
Netland PA, Terada H, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma associated with keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:751–757.
Kumar RS, Tan DT, Por YM, et al. Glaucoma management in patients with osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP): the Singapore OOKP Study. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:354–360.

Auteurs

Shaunak K Bakshi (SK)

Disruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

John Graney (J)

JG Machine Company, Wilmington, MA.

Eleftherios I Paschalis (EI)

Disruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Shweta Agarwal (S)

Dr G Sitalakshmi Memorial Clinic for Ocular Surface Disorders, Sankara Nethralaya, India.

Sayan Basu (S)

Tej Kohli Cornea Institute, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; and.

Geetha Iyer (G)

Dr G Sitalakshmi Memorial Clinic for Ocular Surface Disorders, Sankara Nethralaya, India.

Christopher Liu (C)

Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Bhaskar Srinivasan (B)

Dr G Sitalakshmi Memorial Clinic for Ocular Surface Disorders, Sankara Nethralaya, India.

James Chodosh (J)

Disruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH