The changing role of lasers in urologic surgery.
Journal
Current opinion in urology
ISSN: 1473-6586
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
15
11
2019
medline:
8
9
2020
entrez:
15
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To summarize recent publications on the topic of laser in urology and explore new developments which may impact the future role of lasers in surgery. Ho: Yttrium-aluminium garnet (YAG) laser with Moses technology allows less retropulsion during a lithotripsy, yet its efficacy needs to be tested in clinical trials. Data on the efficacy of this device for benign prostatic obstruction treatment is also pending. A new promising generation of laser systems - thulium-fiber (Tm-fiber) lasers - has been introduced. Tm-fiber has already been shown to be effective and well tolerated in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate and has demonstrated favorable outcome compared with Ho:YAG in preclinical lithotripsy studies. However, more studies are needed to better understand the use of this novel technology and elucidate its role within the armamentarium of available technologies. Lasers remain an integral part of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery and stone treatment and gain popularity in en-bloc resection of bladder cancer. Current efficacy of laser systems in prostate cancer ablation and their place in laparoscopy remain unclear, despite promising initial reports.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31724998
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000695
pii: 00042307-202001000-00005
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thulium
8RKC5ATI4P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24-29Références
Parsons RL, Campbell JL, Thomley MW. Carcinoma of the penis treated by the ruby laser. J Urol 1968; 100:38–39.
Gravas S, Bachmann A, Reich O, et al. Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int 2011; 107:1030–1043.
Norris JP, Norris DM, Lee RD, Rubenstein MA. Visual laser ablation of the prostate: clinical experience in 108 patients. J Urol 1993; 150 (5 Pt 2):1612–1614.
Herrmann TR. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World J Urol 2016; 34:1353–1355.
Kavoussi N, Miller N. A comparison of traditional holmium and Moses lasers for prostatic enucleation in a single patient. J Urol 2019; 201 (4S):e166.
Meskawi M, Rivera M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses technology in treating benign prostate hyperplasia. J Urol 2019; 201 (4S):e167.
Fried NM, Murray KE. High-power thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary tissues at 1.94 microm. J Endourol 2005; 19:25–31.
Fried NM. Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 2018; 9:4552–4568.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Okhunov Z, et al. Retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes after monopolar versus laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a single center experience. J Endourol 2018; 32:417–423.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, et al. A randomized trial comparing the learning curve of three endoscopic enucleation techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP and MEP) for BPH using mentoring approach: initial results. Urology 2018; 121:51–57.
Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, et al. Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol 2018; 18:87.
Enikeev D, Okhunov Z, Rapoport L, et al. Novel thulium fiber laser for enucleation of prostate: a retrospective comparison with open simple prostatectomy. J Endourol 2019; 33:16–21.
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Urologic Diseases in America PPrevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012; 62:160–165.
Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol 2017; 58:299–306.
Gomez Sancha F, Rivera VC, Georgiev G, et al. Common trend: move to enucleation: Is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol 2015; 33:539–547.
Peyronnet B, Robert G, Comat V, et al. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between GreenLight 532-nm and holmium lasers. World J Urol 2017; 35:973–983.
Liu Z, Zhao Y, Wang X, et al. Critical reviews of 1470-nm laser vaporization on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lasers Med Sci 2018; 33:323–327.
Zheng X, Qiu Y, Qiu S, et al. Photoselective vaporization has comparative efficacy and safety among high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia patients on or off systematic anticoagulation: a meta-analysis. World J Urol 2019; 37:1377–1387.
Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update. Eur Urol 2017; 71:447–461.
Naselli A, Hurle R, Paparella S, et al. Role of restaging transurethral resection for T1 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:558–567.
Cumberbatch MG, Foerster B, Catto JW, et al. Repeat transurethral resection in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2018; 73:925–933.
Rink M, Babjuk M, Catto JW, et al. Hexyl aminolevulinate-guided fluorescence cystoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: a critical review of the current literature. Eur Urol 2013; 64:624–638.
Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, et al. EAU guidelines on nonmuscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update. Eur Urol 2013; 64:639–653.
Svatek RS, Shariat SF, Novara G, et al. Discrepancy between clinical and pathological stage: external validation of the impact on prognosis in an international radical cystectomy cohort. BJU Int 2011; 107:898–904.
Kramer MW, Rassweiler JJ, Klein J, et al. En bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC): a European multicenter study to compare safety, efficacy, and outcome of laser and electrical en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor. World J Urol 2015; 33:1937–1943.
Kramer MW, Altieri V, Hurle R, et al. Current evidence of transurethral en-bloc resection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3:567–576.
Migliari R, Buffardi A, Ghabin H. Thulium laser endoscopic en bloc enucleation of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Endourol 2015; 29:1258–1262.
Rapoport L, Vinarov A, Enikeev D, et al. Technical aspects of transurethral thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder cancer. J Urol 2018; 199 (4S):e573.
Hermann GG, Mogensen K, Rosthoj S. Outpatient diode laser treatment of intermediate-risk noninvasive bladder tumors without sedation: efficacy, safety and economic analysis. Scand J Urol 2018; 52:194–198.
Shariat SF, Milowsky M, Droller MJ. Bladder cancer in the elderly. Urol Oncol 2009; 27:653–667.
Korn SM, Hubner NA, Seitz C, et al. Role of lasers in urology. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2019; 18:295–303.
Chen S, Zhou L, Wei T, et al. Comparison of holmium:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: an update meta-analysis. Urol Int 2017; 98:125–133.
Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16:071403.
Winship B, Wollin D, Carlos E, et al. Dusting efficiency of the Moses holmium laser: an automated in vitro assessment. J Endourol 2018; 32:1131–1135.
Elhilali MM, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, Andonian S. Use of the Moses technology to improve holmium laser lithotripsy outcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol 2017; 31:598–604.
Mekayten M, Lorber A, Katafigiotis I, et al. Will stone density stop being a key factor in endourology? The impact of stone density on laser time using lumenis laser p120w and standard 20 W laser: a comparative study. J Endourol 2019; 33:585–589.
Landman J, Monga M, El-Gabry EA, et al. Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets. J Urol 2002; 167:2377–2379.
Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Gakis G, et al. Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation. Urol Res 2011; 39:483–486.
Laurian D, Bhaskar KS, Keller EX, et al. High power Holmim Moses technology versus super-pulse thulium fibre laser: which is more efficient on stones? J Urol 2019; 201 (4S):e58.
Traxer O, Tsarichenko RL, Dymov D, et al. V03-02 First clinical study on superpulse thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. J Urol 2018; 199:e321–e322.
Barzilay B, Lijovetzky G, Shapiro A, Caine M. The clinical use of CO2 laser beam in the surgery of kidney parenchyma. Lasers Surg Med 1982; 2:81–87.
Kyriazis I, Ozsoy M, Kallidonis P, et al. Current evidence on lasers in laparoscopy: partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2015; 33:589–594.
Drerup M, Magdy A, Hager M, et al. Non-ischemic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using 1318-nm diode laser for small exophytic renal tumors. BMC Urol 2018; 18:99doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0405-9.
Jiang DL, Yang Z, Liu GX, et al. A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34:807–813.
Taratkin M, Enikeev D, Glybochko P, et al. An in-vitro study of hybrid laser for prostate surgery. J Urol 2019; 201 (4S):e9.
Amin Z, Lees WR, Bown SG. Technical note: interstitial laser photocoagulation for the treatment of prostatic cancer. Br J Radiol 1993; 66:1044–1047.
Oto A, Sethi I, Karczmar G, et al. MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. Radiology 2013; 267:932–940.
Walser E, Nance A, Ynalvez L, et al. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: results in 120 patients with low- to intermediate-risk disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30:401.e2–409.e2.
Natarajan S, Jones TA, Priester AM, et al. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion for guidance. J Urol 2017; 198:839–847.
Black JF, Wade N, Barton JK. Mechanistic comparison of blood undergoing laser photocoagulation at 532 and 1064 nm. Lasers Surg Med 2005; 36:155–165.
Peavy GM. Lasers and laser-tissue interaction. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2002; 32:517–534. v–vi.
Rieken M, Bachmann A. Laser treatment of benign prostate enlargement: which laser for which prostate? Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11:142–152.