The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application.
Arthroscopy
Bone Marrow Cells
/ physiology
Cell Count
Cell Proliferation
Cell Separation
Cells, Cultured
Centrifugation
Colony-Forming Units Assay
Female
Humans
Humerus
/ cytology
Male
Middle Aged
Rotator Cuff
/ surgery
Stem Cells
/ physiology
Suction
Time Factors
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
/ methods
Biologic augmentation
Bone marrow aspiration
Proximal humerus
Shoulder surgery
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Nov 2019
14 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
08
04
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
entrez:
16
11
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Low aspiration volumes have been recommended to allow for higher concentrations of progenitor cells during bone marrow harvesting. However, these guidelines then require multiple aspiration attempts in order to maximize cellular yield. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a single, high-volume aspiration with four consecutive aliquots on the number of nucleated cells (NCs) and colony-forming units (CFUs) in concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) taken from the proximal humerus. cBMA was taken from the proximal humerus of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Four 12-mL double syringes were used consecutively from a single trocar to obtain four 10 cc aliquots. Each then underwent centrifugation to create a fractionated layer rich in nucleated cells. Following cellular separation, NCs were counted and CFUs were evaluated after incubation of 7-10 days. Cellular comparisons between each aliquot were performed along with their interaction with patient age and sex. Twenty-nine patients (55.9 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. The number of NCs and CFUs showed significant differences between the four aliquots of aspirate, with the first 10 cc aliquot providing the highest amount (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were found between the sum of the three sequential aliquots compared to the initial 10 cc sample. There were no significant differences between male and female patients (p > 0.05). Increasing age resulted in no significant decrease in the number of NCs and CFUs across the four consecutive aliquots (p > 0.05). In conclusion, while the initial aliquot provided the greatest number of nucleated cells and cultured CFUs, the addition of each sequential volume aspirate yielded similar amounts in total. This demonstrates the potential effectiveness of obtaining of higher volume aspirates from the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Low aspiration volumes have been recommended to allow for higher concentrations of progenitor cells during bone marrow harvesting. However, these guidelines then require multiple aspiration attempts in order to maximize cellular yield. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a single, high-volume aspiration with four consecutive aliquots on the number of nucleated cells (NCs) and colony-forming units (CFUs) in concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) taken from the proximal humerus.
METHODS
METHODS
cBMA was taken from the proximal humerus of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Four 12-mL double syringes were used consecutively from a single trocar to obtain four 10 cc aliquots. Each then underwent centrifugation to create a fractionated layer rich in nucleated cells. Following cellular separation, NCs were counted and CFUs were evaluated after incubation of 7-10 days. Cellular comparisons between each aliquot were performed along with their interaction with patient age and sex.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-nine patients (55.9 ± 4.6 years) were included in this study. The number of NCs and CFUs showed significant differences between the four aliquots of aspirate, with the first 10 cc aliquot providing the highest amount (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were found between the sum of the three sequential aliquots compared to the initial 10 cc sample. There were no significant differences between male and female patients (p > 0.05). Increasing age resulted in no significant decrease in the number of NCs and CFUs across the four consecutive aliquots (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, while the initial aliquot provided the greatest number of nucleated cells and cultured CFUs, the addition of each sequential volume aspirate yielded similar amounts in total. This demonstrates the potential effectiveness of obtaining of higher volume aspirates from the proximal humerus during rotator cuff repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31727036
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2924-2
pii: 10.1186/s12891-019-2924-2
pmc: PMC6857344
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
543Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):1047-53
pubmed: 9234881
Blood. 1982 May;59(5):1046-54
pubmed: 7042002
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2213-2220
pubmed: 28804813
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jun;33(6):1167-1174.e1
pubmed: 28187903
J Bone Miner Metab. 1999;17(3):171-7
pubmed: 10757676
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1S):S1-S10
pubmed: 28043853
Bone Marrow Res. 2015;2015:914935
pubmed: 26346476
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 6;18(1):292
pubmed: 28683795
Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017 Sep;18(3):e6-e14
pubmed: 29276433
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 26;17:230
pubmed: 27229856
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Aug;39(7):382-386
pubmed: 31305383
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19;95(12):1101-7
pubmed: 23783207
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 18;16:258
pubmed: 26385099
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1430-7
pubmed: 15995108
Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7
pubmed: 16923606
J Transl Med. 2016 Aug 26;14(1):246
pubmed: 27565858
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Dec;87(12):2655-61
pubmed: 16322615
Int Orthop. 2014 Sep;38(9):1811-8
pubmed: 24913770
Science. 1999 Apr 2;284(5411):143-7
pubmed: 10102814
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 2;99(15):1305-1313
pubmed: 28763416
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov;79(11):1699-709
pubmed: 9384430
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019 Feb;13(2):203-216
pubmed: 30537333
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1673-1682
pubmed: 28976432
Bone Marrow Res. 2016;2016:3152065
pubmed: 27057356
J Orthop Res. 2001 Jan;19(1):117-25
pubmed: 11332607
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2377-84
pubmed: 24793788
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1217-22
pubmed: 24075028
Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2279-87
pubmed: 23881064
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):349-55
pubmed: 10204950
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:322-7
pubmed: 16951103
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1438-47
pubmed: 20375368