3D angle-independent Doppler and speckle tracking for the myocardium and blood flow
ultrasound
Doppler
speckle tracking
radio indices
3D
angle-independence
Journal
Echo research and practice
ISSN: 2055-0464
Titre abrégé: Echo Res Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101664713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2019
01 Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez:
16
11
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
16
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A technology based on velocity ratio indices is described for application in the myocardium. Angle-independent Doppler indices, such as the pulsatility index, which employ velocity ratios, can be measured even if the ultrasound beam vector at the moving target and the motion vector are not in a known plane. The unknown plane situation is often encountered when an ultrasound beam interrogates sites in the myocardium. The velocities employed in an index calculation must be close to the same or opposite directions. The Doppler velocity ratio indices are independent of angle in 3D space as are ratio indices based on 1D strain and 1D speckle tracking. Angle-independent results with spectral Doppler methods are discussed. Possible future imaging techniques based on velocity ratios are presented. By using indices that involve ratios, several other sources of error cancel in addition to that of angular dependence for example errors due to less than optimum gain settings and beam distortion. This makes the indices reliable as research or clinical tools. Ratio techniques can be readily implemented with current commercial blood flow pulsed wave duplex Doppler equipment or with pulsed wave tissue Doppler equipment. In 70 patients where the quality of the real-time B-mode looked suitable for the Doppler velocity ratio technique, there was only one case where clear spectra could not be obtained for both the LV wall and the septum. A reproducibility study of spectra from the septum of the heart shows a 12% difference in velocity ratios in the repeat measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31729209
doi: 10.1530/ERP-19-0040
pii: ERP-19-0040
pmc: PMC8111307
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105-114Informations de copyright
© 2019 The authors
Références
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jul 1;64(1):66-75
pubmed: 2741815
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014 Jun;22(2):49-57
pubmed: 25031794
Br J Radiol. 1994 Jul;67(799):679-88
pubmed: 8062010
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998 Nov;11(11):1013-9
pubmed: 9812093
Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1390-5
pubmed: 10736282
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;16(1):1-11
pubmed: 25525063
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18(6-7):651-4
pubmed: 1413277
Chin Med J (Engl). 2000 Aug;113(8):763-8
pubmed: 11776066
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000 Sep;1(3):154-70
pubmed: 11916589
J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):71-83
pubmed: 21193707
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 Mar;38(3):280-6
pubmed: 2066142
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Jun;33(6):894-904
pubmed: 17434660
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(6):776-81
pubmed: 22977126
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992;39(2):196-203
pubmed: 18263137
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Jan;40(1):222-31
pubmed: 24210859
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Oct;32(10):1509-13
pubmed: 17045871
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Oct 7;59(19):L1-L13
pubmed: 25207828
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Jun;24(5):639-46
pubmed: 9695266
Ultrasonics. 2018 Mar;84:329-340
pubmed: 29223692
Angiology. 1971 Jan;22(1):52-5
pubmed: 5101050
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1982;8(3):263-71
pubmed: 7101574