Primary baerveldt versus trabeculectomy study after 5 years of follow-up.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma
/ physiopathology
Glaucoma Drainage Implants
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
/ physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Implantation
/ methods
Reoperation
Sclera
/ surgery
Time Factors
Trabeculectomy
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
Baerveldt
glaucoma
intraocular pressure
trabeculectomy
Journal
Acta ophthalmologica
ISSN: 1755-3768
Titre abrégé: Acta Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101468102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2019
accepted:
06
09
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
1
4
2021
entrez:
16
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although the Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) initially was reserved for refractory glaucoma, its role in the surgical management of glaucoma has shifted towards a primary treatment choice. We performed a randomized prospective study to compare BGI surgery and trabeculectomy (TE) in patients without previous ocular surgery. We included 119 glaucoma patients without previous ocular surgery. One eye of each subject was randomized to either a BGI or TE. Follow-up visits were at 1 day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years postoperatively. Primary outcomes were intraocular pressure (IOP) and failure rate. Secondary outcomes were medication, anterior chamber laser flare value and complications. After 5 years, an IOP of 12.7 ± 3.9 mmHg (mean ± SD) was achieved in the TE group and 12.9 ± 3.9 mmHg in the BGI group. We found no statistically significant difference in failure rate between the groups (p = 0.72). More BGI patients needed additional medication to control their IOP (85%; 1.9 ± 1.2 types of glaucoma medication) compared to the TE patients (57%; 0.5 ± 0.9 types of glaucoma medication). Diplopia was significantly more present in the BGI group than in the TE group (27% versus 4%; p < 0.001). The self-limiting complication rate was similar in both groups. Our study demonstrates that, in the long term, the final IOP and failure rate are similar after TE and BGI surgery. However, the need for additional medication after BGI surgery is higher than after TE. Also, the increased risk of developing diplopia after BGI surgery must be taken into consideration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31729825
doi: 10.1111/aos.14265
pmc: PMC7317510
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
400-407Subventions
Organisme : ZonMw, Topzorg
ID : 842005004
Organisme : Advanced Medical Optics (AMO)
Organisme : Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Oogziekenhuis (SWOO)
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Références
Bar-David L & Blumenthal EZ (2018): Evolution of glaucoma surgery in the last 25 years. Rambam Maimonides Med J 9: e0024.
Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD & Budenz DL (2012): Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153: 789-803.e2.
Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Shi W et al. (2018): Treatment outcomes in the primary tube versus trabeculectomy study after 1 year of follow-up. Ophthalmology 125: 650-663.
Gonzales CA, Ladas JG, Davis JL, Feuer WJ & Holland GN (2001): Relationships between laser flare photometry values and complications of uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 119: 1763-1769.
Holland G (2007): A reconsideration of anterior chamber flare and its clinical relevance for children with chronic anterior uveitis (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 105: 344-364.
Islamaj E, Jordaan-Kuip CP, Vermeer KA, Lemij HG & de Waard PWT (2018a): Motility changes and diplopia after baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation or after trabeculectomy. Transl Vis Sci Technol 7: 7.
Islamaj E, Wubbels RJ & de Waard PWT (2018b): Primary Baerveldt versus trabeculectomy study after one-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 96: e740-e746.
Molteno ACB, Bevin TH, Herbison P & Husni MA (2011): Long-term results of primary trabeculectomies and Molteno implants for primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 129: 1444-1450.
Montolio FGJ, Müskens RPHM & Jansonius NM (2019): Influence of glaucoma surgery on visual function: a clinical cohort study and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 97: 193-199.
Panarelli JF, Banitt MR, Gedde SJ, Shi W, Schiffman JC & Feuer WJ (2016): A retrospective comparison of primary baerveldt implantation versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 123: 789-795.
Selen F, Tekeli O & Yanik O (2017): Assessment of the anterior chamber flare and macular thickness in patients treated with topical antiglaucomatous drugs. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 33: 170-175.
Wen Ying WC, Christoff A, Subramanian PS & Eggenberger ER (2011): Diplopia and quality of life. Ophthalmology 118: 1481.e2.
Wilson MR, Mendis U, Paliwal A & Haynatzka V (2003): Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 136: 464-470.