Phosphorylation of NFATC1 at PIM1 target sites is essential for its ability to promote prostate cancer cell migration and invasion.


Journal

Cell communication and signaling : CCS
ISSN: 1478-811X
Titre abrégé: Cell Commun Signal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170464

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2019
Historique:
received: 18 06 2019
accepted: 22 10 2019
entrez: 16 11 2019
pubmed: 16 11 2019
medline: 2 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Progression of prostate cancer from benign local tumors to metastatic carcinomas is a multistep process. Here we have investigated the signaling pathways that support migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells, focusing on the role of the NFATC1 transcription factor and its post-translational modifications. We have previously identified NFATC1 as a substrate for the PIM1 kinase and shown that PIM1-dependent phosphorylation increases NFATC1 activity without affecting its subcellular localization. Both PIM kinases and NFATC1 have been reported to promote cancer cell migration, invasion and angiogenesis, but it has remained unclear whether the effects of NFATC1 are phosphorylation-dependent and which downstream targets are involved. We used mass spectrometry to identify PIM1 phosphorylation target sites in NFATC1, and analysed their functional roles in three prostate cancer cell lines by comparing phosphodeficient mutants to wild-type NFATC1. We used luciferase assays to determine effects of phosphorylation on NFAT-dependent transcriptional activity, and migration and invasion assays to evaluate effects on cell motility. We also performed a microarray analysis to identify novel PIM1/NFATC1 targets, and validated one of them with both cellular expression analyses and in silico in clinical prostate cancer data sets. Here we have identified ten PIM1 target sites in NFATC1 and found that prevention of their phosphorylation significantly decreases the transcriptional activity as well as the pro-migratory and pro-invasive effects of NFATC1 in prostate cancer cells. We observed that also PIM2 and PIM3 can phosphorylate NFATC1, and identified several novel putative PIM1/NFATC1 target genes. These include the ITGA5 integrin, which is differentially expressed in the presence of wild-type versus phosphorylation-deficient NFATC1, and which is coexpressed with PIM1 and NFATC1 in clinical prostate cancer specimens. Based on our data, phosphorylation of PIM1 target sites stimulates NFATC1 activity and enhances its ability to promote prostate cancer cell migration and invasion. Therefore, inhibition of the interplay between PIM kinases and NFATC1 may have therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic forms of cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Progression of prostate cancer from benign local tumors to metastatic carcinomas is a multistep process. Here we have investigated the signaling pathways that support migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells, focusing on the role of the NFATC1 transcription factor and its post-translational modifications. We have previously identified NFATC1 as a substrate for the PIM1 kinase and shown that PIM1-dependent phosphorylation increases NFATC1 activity without affecting its subcellular localization. Both PIM kinases and NFATC1 have been reported to promote cancer cell migration, invasion and angiogenesis, but it has remained unclear whether the effects of NFATC1 are phosphorylation-dependent and which downstream targets are involved.
METHODS
We used mass spectrometry to identify PIM1 phosphorylation target sites in NFATC1, and analysed their functional roles in three prostate cancer cell lines by comparing phosphodeficient mutants to wild-type NFATC1. We used luciferase assays to determine effects of phosphorylation on NFAT-dependent transcriptional activity, and migration and invasion assays to evaluate effects on cell motility. We also performed a microarray analysis to identify novel PIM1/NFATC1 targets, and validated one of them with both cellular expression analyses and in silico in clinical prostate cancer data sets.
RESULTS
Here we have identified ten PIM1 target sites in NFATC1 and found that prevention of their phosphorylation significantly decreases the transcriptional activity as well as the pro-migratory and pro-invasive effects of NFATC1 in prostate cancer cells. We observed that also PIM2 and PIM3 can phosphorylate NFATC1, and identified several novel putative PIM1/NFATC1 target genes. These include the ITGA5 integrin, which is differentially expressed in the presence of wild-type versus phosphorylation-deficient NFATC1, and which is coexpressed with PIM1 and NFATC1 in clinical prostate cancer specimens.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our data, phosphorylation of PIM1 target sites stimulates NFATC1 activity and enhances its ability to promote prostate cancer cell migration and invasion. Therefore, inhibition of the interplay between PIM kinases and NFATC1 may have therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic forms of cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31730483
doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0463-y
pii: 10.1186/s12964-019-0463-y
pmc: PMC6858710
doi:

Substances chimiques

NFATC Transcription Factors 0
NFATC1 protein, human 0
PIM1 protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1 EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

148

Références

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55409
pubmed: 23405147
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Nov 09;22:4254-4260
pubmed: 27826135
J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):863-75
pubmed: 2527241
Int J Mol Med. 2015 May;35(5):1333-40
pubmed: 25738651
Cancer Res. 2011 Mar 1;71(5):1742-51
pubmed: 21343398
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec 15;92(4):326-30
pubmed: 16299799
Prostate. 2004 Sep 1;60(4):367-71
pubmed: 15264249
Mol Cancer. 2010 Oct 19;9:279
pubmed: 20958956
Cancer Cell. 2010 Jul 13;18(1):11-22
pubmed: 20579941
Database (Oxford). 2015 Feb 27;2015:null
pubmed: 25725062
Oncol Rep. 2016 Aug;36(2):918-28
pubmed: 27350254
Cancer Res. 2002 May 1;62(9):2708-14
pubmed: 11980672
Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Jul;4(7):540-4
pubmed: 12080349
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Mar;59(3):285-8
pubmed: 16505280
Urol Int. 2010;84(2):212-20
pubmed: 20215828
Oncogene. 1999 Jul 8;18(27):4022-31
pubmed: 10435626
Science. 1997 Mar 28;275(5308):1930-4
pubmed: 9072970
J Immunol. 2002 Feb 15;168(4):1524-7
pubmed: 11823475
Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:707-47
pubmed: 9143705
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Toxicol Lett. 2009 Jan 10;184(1):26-32
pubmed: 19028555
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Aug;6(8):1380-91
pubmed: 17510049
Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 20;6(8):6235-50
pubmed: 25749039
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 12;7(28):43220-43238
pubmed: 27281612
Oncogene. 2000 Feb 24;19(9):1215-24
pubmed: 10713710
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005 Aug 18;138(2):116-23
pubmed: 15935514
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Sep;18(9):533-548
pubmed: 30002479
Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;75(2):153-62
pubmed: 9250363
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 4;9(2):1868-1884
pubmed: 29416737
J Med Chem. 2009 Oct 22;52(20):6369-81
pubmed: 19788246
Mol Biosyst. 2011 Jun;7(6):1828-37
pubmed: 21523302
J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 13;277(50):48664-76
pubmed: 12351631
Gene. 2006 May 10;372:92-102
pubmed: 16513293
Genes Dev. 1997 Apr 1;11(7):824-34
pubmed: 9106655
J Cell Biochem. 2018 Jun;119(6):4717-4728
pubmed: 29274284
Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Jan;10(1):9-22
pubmed: 20029421
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Nov;9(11):810-20
pubmed: 19851316
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172985
pubmed: 28235034
Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;75(19):4026-31
pubmed: 26282172
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990 Dec 14;173(2):534-40
pubmed: 2260966
Exp Cell Res. 2016 Mar 15;342(2):113-24
pubmed: 26934497
Chromosoma. 2002 Jul;111(2):80-95
pubmed: 12111331
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 Dec;93:74-85
pubmed: 29108877
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):1011-25
pubmed: 26544944
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130340
pubmed: 26075720
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Feb 28;25:1572-1581
pubmed: 30817743
Cell Rep. 2016 Jul 12;16(2):405-418
pubmed: 27346349
Mol Carcinog. 2014 Mar;53(3):169-80
pubmed: 23115104
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 12;30:75
pubmed: 21838876
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005 Apr;37(4):726-30
pubmed: 15694833

Auteurs

Sini K Eerola (SK)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Niina M Santio (NM)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.

Sanni Rinne (S)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.

Petri Kouvonen (P)

Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Garry L Corthals (GL)

Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Mauro Scaravilli (M)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Giovanni Scala (G)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Angela Serra (A)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Dario Greco (D)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Pekka Ruusuvuori (P)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Signal processing laboratory, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland.

Leena Latonen (L)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Eeva-Marja Rainio (EM)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.

Tapio Visakorpi (T)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.

Päivi J Koskinen (PJ)

Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland. paivi.koskinen@utu.fi.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH