The bladder is an unreliable witness: The case for urodynamic investigations in female stress urinary incontinence.
Mid-urethral sling
Stress urinary incontinence
Surgery
Urodynamics
Journal
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
21
09
2019
revised:
25
10
2019
accepted:
29
10
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
13
11
2020
entrez:
16
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For some years, the role of urodynamics (UDS) in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been a topic of intense debate. The findings of the VaLUE and VUSIS-II randomised clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2012 appeared to suggest that UDS is not useful in women with uncomplicated SUI, with the result that several authoritative guidelines were amended and the routine use of UDS in this setting fell sharply. However, many experts have raised concerns about the design of these two RCTs and their subsequent interpretation - including the inappropriate generalisation of the findings beyond uncomplicated cases, which represent only a small minority of the overall patient population. In this paper, we consider a range of issues and confounding factors which raise doubts about how influential these RCTs should have been and reflect on the potential value of UDS both for objective diagnosis and patient counselling in female SUI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31731022
pii: S0301-2115(19)30502-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.046
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
35-37Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.