Soft tissue mobilization techniques in treating chronic abdominal scar tissue: A quasi-experimental single subject design.
Abdomen
Fascia
Massage
Scar
Journal
Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
ISSN: 1532-9283
Titre abrégé: J Bodyw Mov Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9700068
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
10
04
2019
accepted:
22
04
2019
entrez:
18
11
2019
pubmed:
18
11
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Roughly 17 million abdominal surgeries are performed annually in the U.S. Up to 17% of those may be readmitted for adhesion related problems. This study evaluated the effectiveness of soft tissue mobilization (STM) techniques at improving chronic pain, mobility restrictions and functional deficits following complex abdominal surgery. Subjects Two females aged 51 and 65. Single subject quasi-experimental A-B-A. Four 30-min treatment sessions of abdominal tissue mobilizations. Outcome measures Pain pressure threshold (PPT) and average scar mobility (ASM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subject 1 ASM and PPT of the abdomen improved significantly and exceeded the established standard error of measurement (SEM). PPT of the scar decreased during the second baseline. This decrease exceeded the SEM for PPT but was not statistically significant. The changes in NPRS did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Subject 2 abdominal PPT and ASM showed statistically significant improvements that exceeded their SEMs. Scar PPT showed improvement during the repeat baseline, however, this reached neither statistical significance nor the SEM. Scar mobility and abdominal PPT improved both statistically and clinically in both subjects after only 4 sessions of STM. Scar pain measured by NPRS and PPT did not show significant improvement. This study demonstrated that STM can be an effective way to treat chronic abdominal scars by increasing scar mobility and reducing abdominal sensitivity to pressure. It is non-invasive, and is a less costly alternative to laparoscopic adhesiolysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31733765
pii: S1360-8592(19)30123-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
805-814Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.