Soft tissue mobilization techniques in treating chronic abdominal scar tissue: A quasi-experimental single subject design.


Journal

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
ISSN: 1532-9283
Titre abrégé: J Bodyw Mov Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9700068

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 10 04 2019
accepted: 22 04 2019
entrez: 18 11 2019
pubmed: 18 11 2019
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Roughly 17 million abdominal surgeries are performed annually in the U.S. Up to 17% of those may be readmitted for adhesion related problems. This study evaluated the effectiveness of soft tissue mobilization (STM) techniques at improving chronic pain, mobility restrictions and functional deficits following complex abdominal surgery. Subjects Two females aged 51 and 65. Single subject quasi-experimental A-B-A. Four 30-min treatment sessions of abdominal tissue mobilizations. Outcome measures Pain pressure threshold (PPT) and average scar mobility (ASM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Subject 1 ASM and PPT of the abdomen improved significantly and exceeded the established standard error of measurement (SEM). PPT of the scar decreased during the second baseline. This decrease exceeded the SEM for PPT but was not statistically significant. The changes in NPRS did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Subject 2 abdominal PPT and ASM showed statistically significant improvements that exceeded their SEMs. Scar PPT showed improvement during the repeat baseline, however, this reached neither statistical significance nor the SEM. Scar mobility and abdominal PPT improved both statistically and clinically in both subjects after only 4 sessions of STM. Scar pain measured by NPRS and PPT did not show significant improvement. This study demonstrated that STM can be an effective way to treat chronic abdominal scars by increasing scar mobility and reducing abdominal sensitivity to pressure. It is non-invasive, and is a less costly alternative to laparoscopic adhesiolysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31733765
pii: S1360-8592(19)30123-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.04.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

805-814

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Ryan C Kelly (RC)

Franklin Pierce University, Performance Health Sport & Spine Therapy, 30 Spruce St. Concord, NH, 03301, USA. Electronic address: Kellyr16@live.franklinpierce.edu.

Michelle Armstrong (M)

Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Alyssa Bensky (A)

Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Abigail Foti (A)

Franklin Pierce University, Manchester, NH, USA.

Jennifer B Wasserman (JB)

Franklin Pierce University, Manchester, NH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH