The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues.

attention bottom-up contingent capture subliminal top-down unconscious

Journal

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2411-5150
Titre abrégé: Vision (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101733282

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 28 02 2019
revised: 28 07 2019
accepted: 31 07 2019
entrez: 19 11 2019
pubmed: 19 11 2019
medline: 19 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Attentional selection in humans is mostly determined by what is important to them or by the saliency of the objects around them. How our visual and attentional system manage these various sources of attentional capture is one of the most intensely debated issues in cognitive psychology. Along with the traditional dichotomy of goal-driven and stimulus-driven theories, newer frameworks such as reward learning and selection history have been proposed as well to understand how a stimulus captures attention. However, surprisingly little is known about the different forms of attentional control by information that is not consciously accessible to us. In this article, we will review several studies that have examined attentional capture by subliminal cues. We will specifically focus on spatial cuing studies that have shown through response times and eye movements that subliminal cues can affect attentional selection. A majority of these studies have argued that attentional capture by subliminal cues is entirely automatic and stimulus-driven. We will evaluate their claims of automaticity and contrast them with a few other studies that have suggested that orienting to unconscious cues proceeds in a manner that is contingent with the top-down goals of the individual. Resolving this debate has consequences for understanding the depths and the limits of unconscious processing. It has implications for general theories of attentional selection as well. In this review, we aim to provide the current status of research in this domain and point out open questions and future directions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31735839
pii: vision3030038
doi: 10.3390/vision3030038
pmc: PMC6802795
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:268-87
pubmed: 24960432
Neuron. 2007 Jun 7;54(5):697-711
pubmed: 17553420
Cognition. 2002 Aug;85(1):37-52
pubmed: 12086712
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 09;368(1628):20130055
pubmed: 24018717
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):299-309
pubmed: 20378092
Spat Vis. 2004;17(4-5):295-325
pubmed: 15559107
Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
pubmed: 8008550
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):48-57
pubmed: 25413876
Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):297-326
pubmed: 16536645
Perception. 1993;22(6):681-9
pubmed: 8255698
Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):678-86
pubmed: 16639613
Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(16):2104-9
pubmed: 19500616
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1463-75
pubmed: 16366802
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Nov;67(8):1354-61
pubmed: 16555587
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar;83(3):1751-5
pubmed: 10712494
J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 17;30(11):4143-50
pubmed: 20237284
J Vis. 2003;3(1):32-40
pubmed: 12678623
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):127-32
pubmed: 19145022
Cogn Psychol. 1983 Apr;15(2):197-237
pubmed: 6617135
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jan;6(1):75-81
pubmed: 12469132
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):604-13
pubmed: 16768363
Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1183-201
pubmed: 10788635
J Neurosci. 2008 Aug 6;28(32):8053-62
pubmed: 18685030
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
pubmed: 1431742
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1153-65
pubmed: 26030438
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1104-20
pubmed: 26854530
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2008 Jul 15;3(1-2):289-306
pubmed: 20517515
Vision Res. 2010 Sep 15;50(19):2015-27
pubmed: 20659496
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1416-1425
pubmed: 29766295
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):79-92
pubmed: 29191511
Vision Res. 2003 Jun;43(12):1351-63
pubmed: 12742105
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;1(1):51-59
pubmed: 26272838
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):287-93
pubmed: 16892996
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):138-147
pubmed: 10740278
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):326-41
pubmed: 20139449
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Nov;64(8):1346-60
pubmed: 12519031
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):106-13
pubmed: 22245618
Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 5;16(23):2332-6
pubmed: 17141615
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1737-47
pubmed: 9861720
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 23;6:61
pubmed: 22470329
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Feb;23(1):168-80
pubmed: 9157183
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 24;6:30
pubmed: 22375115
Am Psychol. 1992 Jun;47(6):766-79
pubmed: 1616174
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):648-53
pubmed: 19648447
Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):597-600
pubmed: 9783584
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):21
pubmed: 31517195
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2011;7:108-19
pubmed: 22253673
J Vis. 2013 Jul 01;13(3):14
pubmed: 23818660
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):204-11
pubmed: 16603406
Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct 4;:956797618799302
pubmed: 30285577
Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):637-43
pubmed: 16129394
Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(1):108-13
pubmed: 17087987
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1346-1364
pubmed: 30378084
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1455-70
pubmed: 20675793
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):132-8
pubmed: 16724780
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):2401-7
pubmed: 10943693
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
pubmed: 7367577
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):433-451
pubmed: 28816482
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2069-86
pubmed: 21097852
Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:1-7
pubmed: 24747830
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):181-99
pubmed: 1621880
Science. 1996 Sep 20;273(5282):1699-702
pubmed: 8781230
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):121-34
pubmed: 2137514
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(1):9-18
pubmed: 22419962
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):888-902
pubmed: 19320547
Psychol Res. 2004 Aug;68(4):224-36
pubmed: 12827351
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 18;3:1
pubmed: 22279440
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):737-48
pubmed: 25520044
Vision Res. 2010 Mar 17;50(6):606-13
pubmed: 20074582
Trends Neurosci. 2015 Apr;38(4):247-58
pubmed: 25765322
Psychol Rev. 1960 Sep;67:279-300
pubmed: 13697142
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1129-39
pubmed: 19653754
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):16-22
pubmed: 17129748
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43
pubmed: 22795563
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99
pubmed: 20507828
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):762-77
pubmed: 16131248
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):974-88
pubmed: 23106374
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1996 Sep;13(9):1777-87
pubmed: 8776892
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Feb;36(1):1-16
pubmed: 20121291
J Neurosci. 2007 May 23;27(21):5805-11
pubmed: 17522324
Brain Sci. 2012 Feb 15;2(1):33-60
pubmed: 24962685
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Nov;35(11):5500-16
pubmed: 24954512
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):414-420.e3
pubmed: 29358071
Nature. 1973 Jun 1;243(5405):295-6
pubmed: 4774871
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):411-7
pubmed: 22795561
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525
pubmed: 21549742
Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54
pubmed: 3362663

Auteurs

Seema Prasad (S)

Center for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India.

Ramesh Kumar Mishra (RK)

Center for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500046, India.

Classifications MeSH