Perspective: Using Bronchiectasis Action Management Plans for Children With Bronchiectasis-Can It Improve Clinical Care?
action plan
bronchiectasis
children
clinical trials
management plan
randomized controlled trials
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
08
2019
accepted:
07
10
2019
entrez:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
19
11
2019
medline:
19
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While once thought to be rare, bronchiectasis has been increasing globally over the last 15 years. Bronchiectasis is a major contributor to chronic lung morbidity and mortality but remains a neglected disease in respiratory health globally. Currently, few high-level evidence-based management strategies are available for children with bronchiectasis. Strategies to improve clinical outcomes associated with exacerbations are important. In other respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of personalized written management plans have been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Personalized management plans have also been recommended as part of treatment plans in adults with bronchiectasis. We thus undertook a review of the current literature to determine available evidence, and to establish whether a personalized written bronchiectasis action management plan (BAMP) improves clinical outcomes in children with bronchiectasis. Our search identified 43 articles; 16 duplicates were removed and a further 23 were excluded on titles and abstracts alone. Four full-text articles were reviewed but excluded. In the absence of any published studies, it remains unknown whether the use of BAMP is beneficial for improving clinical outcomes for children with bronchiectasis. These results have highlighted this clinical gap and identified the need for high-quality research to inform practice. Until high-quality evidence is available, clinicians are advised to adhere to current national and/or international guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31737587
doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00428
pmc: PMC6831557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
428Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Schutz, Marchant, Chang, Turner, Chatfield and McCallum.
Références
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004 Oct;23(10):902-8
pubmed: 15602188
Respirology. 2018 Aug;23(8):743-749
pubmed: 29502335
Aust J Rural Health. 2018 Mar 24;:null
pubmed: 29573520
Med J Aust. 2015 Jan 19;202(1):21-3
pubmed: 25588439
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 04;8:CD011682
pubmed: 28777450
Front Pediatr. 2017 Feb 20;5:27
pubmed: 28265556
Chest. 2010 Jul;138(1):158-64
pubmed: 20173055
Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 9;50(3):
pubmed: 28889110
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Mar;29(3):182-7
pubmed: 10686038
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4:CD011859
pubmed: 28394084
Respirology. 2019 Feb;24(2):115-126
pubmed: 30500093
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jun 15;191(12):1374-83
pubmed: 25867075
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):35-46
pubmed: 8901365
Eur Respir J. 2008 Mar;31(3):571-8
pubmed: 17989117
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 07;2:CD012528
pubmed: 29411860
Chest. 2012 Apr;141(4):1018-1024
pubmed: 21885727
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):866-879
pubmed: 30215382
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 May;51(5):450-69
pubmed: 26840008
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 02;11:CD012315
pubmed: 30387126
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 19;12:CD005074
pubmed: 27990628