Minocycline at 2 Different Dosages vs Placebo for Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2020
01 02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
19
11
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
19
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are no disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia. Minocycline is anti-inflammatory, protects against the toxic effects of β-amyloid in vitro and in animal models of AD, and is a credible repurposed treatment candidate. To determine whether 24 months of minocycline treatment can modify cognitive and functional decline in patients with mild AD. Participants were recruited into a double-blind randomized clinical trial from May 23, 2014, to April 14, 2016, with 24 months of treatment and follow-up. This multicenter study in England and Scotland involved 32 National Health Service memory clinics within secondary specialist services for people with dementia. From 886 screened patients, 554 patients with a diagnosis of mild AD (Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE] score ≥24) were randomized. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1:1 in a semifactorial design to receive minocycline (400 mg/d or 200 mg/d) or placebo for 24 months. Primary outcome measures were decrease in sMMSE score and Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS), analyzed by intention-to-treat repeated-measures regression. Of 544 eligible participants (241 women and 303 men), the mean (SD) age was 74.3 (8.2) years, and the mean (SD) sMMSE score was 26.4 (1.9). Fewer participants completed 400-mg minocycline hydrochloride treatment (28.8% [53 of 184]) than 200-mg minocycline treatment (61.9% [112 of 181]) or placebo (63.7% [114 of 179]; P < .001), mainly because of gastrointestinal symptoms (42 in the 400-mg group, 15 in the 200-mg group, and 10 in the placebo group; P < .001), dermatologic adverse effects (10 in the 400-mg group, 5 in the 200-mg group, and 1 in the placebo group; P = .02), and dizziness (14 in the 400-mg group, 3 in the 200-mg group, and 1 in the placebo group; P = .01). Assessment rates were lower in the 400-mg group: 68.4% (119 of 174 expected) for sMMSE at 24 months compared with 81.8% (144 of 176) for the 200-mg group and 83.8% (140 of 167) for the placebo group. Decrease in sMMSE scores over 24 months in the combined minocycline group was similar to that in the placebo group (4.1 vs 4.3 points). The combined minocycline group had mean sMMSE scores 0.1 points higher than the placebo group (95% CI, -1.1 to 1.2; P = .90). The decrease in mean sMMSE scores was less in the 400-mg group than in the 200-mg group (3.3 vs 4.7 points; treatment effect = 1.2; 95% CI, -0.1 to 2.5; P = .08). Worsening of BADLS scores over 24 months was similar in all groups: 5.7 in the 400-mg group, 6.6 in the 200-mg group, and 6.2 in the placebo groups (treatment effect for minocycline vs placebo = -0.53; 95% CI, -2.4 to 1.3; P = .57; treatment effect for 400 mg vs 200 mg of minocycline = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.8; P = .77). Results were similar in different patient subgroups and in sensitivity analyses adjusting for missing data. Minocycline did not delay the progress of cognitive or functional impairment in people with mild AD during a 2-year period. This study also found that 400 mg of minocycline is poorly tolerated in this population. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16105064.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31738372
pii: 2755279
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3762
pmc: PMC6865324
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neuroprotective Agents
0
Minocycline
FYY3R43WGO
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN16105064']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
164-174Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_13091
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR/CS/010/019
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(18):2306-27
pubmed: 24059463
Neuropsychopharmacology. 1992 Jan;6(1):39-48; discussion 49-63
pubmed: 1571068
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2122-2133
pubmed: 28564557
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;5(11):885-894
pubmed: 30322824
J Neuroinflammation. 2012 Apr 02;9:62
pubmed: 22472085
Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Jan;15(1):73-82
pubmed: 25576089
Neurology. 1994 Feb;44(2):227-32
pubmed: 8309563
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Nov;11(11):833-46
pubmed: 23123941
Mov Disord. 2010 Oct 15;25(13):2219-24
pubmed: 20721920
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Glia. 2006 May;53(7):776-82
pubmed: 16534778
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Nov;32(11):2393-404
pubmed: 17406652
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Dec;6(12):1045-53
pubmed: 17980667
Drugs Aging. 2015 Feb;32(2):139-47
pubmed: 25644018
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015 Jan;35(1):71-83
pubmed: 25149075
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Arch Neurol. 2010 Dec;67(12):1442-8
pubmed: 20697034
Brain. 2018 Feb 1;141(2):459-471
pubmed: 29272357
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 1;77(1):43-51
pubmed: 24951455
Metabolism. 2017 Apr;69S:S41-S49
pubmed: 28129888
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Apr;14(4):388-405
pubmed: 25792098
Glia. 2006 Feb;53(3):233-40
pubmed: 16220550
Age Ageing. 1996 Mar;25(2):113-20
pubmed: 8670538
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 3;77:23-31
pubmed: 28336494
FASEB J. 2009 Mar;23(3):739-50
pubmed: 19001528
Mov Disord. 2010 Jan 15;25(1):97-107
pubmed: 20014118
Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:87-94; discussion 143-50
pubmed: 9447431
Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 07;9:625
pubmed: 30131755
Neurobiol Aging. 2007 May;28(5):639-47
pubmed: 16697488
Neurodegener Dis. 2012;9(4):187-98
pubmed: 22584394