Impact of Global Budget Revenue Policy on Emergency Department Efficiency in the State of Maryland.
Budgets
/ organization & administration
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
Cost Control
Efficiency, Organizational
/ economics
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ organization & administration
Health Care Reform
Hospital Costs
Humans
Length of Stay
/ economics
Maryland
Medicaid
/ organization & administration
Models, Statistical
State Government
United States
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2019
14 Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
25
03
2019
accepted:
01
08
2019
entrez:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
19
11
2019
medline:
18
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On January 1, 2014, the State of Maryland implemented the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) program. We investigate the impact of GBR on length of stay (LOS) for inpatients in emergency departments (ED) in Maryland. We used the Hospital Compare data reports from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and CMS Cost Reports Hospital Form 2552-10 from January 1, 2012-March 31, 2016, with GBR hospitals from Maryland and hospitals from West Virginia (WV), Delaware (DE), and Rhode Island (RI). We implemented difference-in-differences analysis and investigated the impact of GBR implementation on the LOS or ED1b scores of Maryland hospitals using a mixed-effects model with a state-level fixed effect, a hospital-level random effect, and state-level heterogeneity. The GBR impact estimator was 9.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.06 to 11.87, p-value<0.001) for Maryland GBR hospitals, which implies, on average, that GBR implementation added 9.47 minutes per year to the time that hospital inpatients spent in the ED in the first two years after GBR implementation. The effect of the total number of hospital beds was 0.21 (95% CI, 0.089 to 0.330, p-value = 0 .001), which suggests that the bigger the hospital, the longer the ED1b score. The state-level fixed effects for WV were -106.96 (95% CI, -175.06 to -38.86, p-value = 0.002), for DE it was 6.51 (95% CI, -8.80 to 21.82, p-value=0.405), and for RI it was -54.48 (95% CI, -82.85 to -26.10, p-value<0.001). Our results indicate that GBR implementation has had a statistically significant negative impact on the efficiency measure ED1b of Maryland hospital EDs from January 2014 to April 2016. We also found that the significant state-level fixed effect implies that the same inpatient might experience different ED processing times in each of the four states that we studied.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31738715
pii: westjem.2019.8.43201
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.8.43201
pmc: PMC6860385
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
885-892Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1899-901
pubmed: 26559570
Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Dec;15(4):310-26
pubmed: 22297925
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Sep 1;2(3):177-183
pubmed: 25264518
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2551-7
pubmed: 24369080
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):3
pubmed: 28083290
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):285-292
pubmed: 28723320
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):501-9, 509.e1
pubmed: 17913300
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1291-3
pubmed: 26308595
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):2029-32
pubmed: 23534546
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1643-50
pubmed: 20820020
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1885-94
pubmed: 22786651
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):692-4
pubmed: 23425161
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 2;367(5):391-3
pubmed: 22784039
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):483-500
pubmed: 19207590
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;44(6):577-85
pubmed: 15573032
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):1-5
pubmed: 17913299
Health Care Manag Sci. 2016 Jun;19(2):130-43
pubmed: 25304876