The Development of a Hoof Conformation Assessment for Use in Dairy Goats.
claw shape
claw splay
heel shape
lameness
objective measures
subjective scores
toe length
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Nov 2019
14 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
revised:
08
11
2019
accepted:
09
11
2019
entrez:
20
11
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
20
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The assessment of hoof conformation is important due to its recognized relationship with the biomechanical functionality of the hoof. Hoof conformation can be assessed using objective measures or subjective scores. However, to date, there are limited data using either method in dairy goats. Therefore, the aims were to (1) develop a reliable method of assessing hoof conformation in dairy goats, and (2) compare two aspects of a subjective assessment against corresponding objective measures as a means of validation. A total of 1035 goats contributed photographs across 16 commercial dairy goat farms. Photographs were taken of the left front and left hind hoof in the lateral and dorsal aspect at five assessments across the goats' first two lactations. Hoof conformation was assessed using five subjective scores (toe length, heel shape, fetlock shape, claw splay, and claw shape) and two objective measures (toe length ratio and claw splay distance). Following the training of two observers, high levels of inter and intra-reliability were achieved for both the subjective scores (>0.8 weighted kappa) and objective measures (>0.8 Lin's concordance correlation coefficient). Two aspects of the subjectively assessed ordinal scores were compared with the objective measures with high levels of accuracy (>0.8). This suggests that the subjective scores may be a suitable alternative to more time-consuming objective measures when assessment is completed using photographs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31739587
pii: ani9110973
doi: 10.3390/ani9110973
pmc: PMC6912638
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Animal. 2009 Jan;3(1):87-95
pubmed: 22444175
Vet Rec. 2010 Nov 13;167(20):774-80
pubmed: 21262609
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Dec 1;97(3-4):237-44
pubmed: 21035215
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2625-33
pubmed: 19447995
J Anim Sci. 2008 Sep;86(9):2392-400
pubmed: 18441074
Equine Vet J. 2008 Nov;40(7):623-8
pubmed: 19165930
Res Vet Sci. 1994 May;56(3):265-9
pubmed: 8073175
Vet Rec. 2000 Jul 22;147(4):105-9
pubmed: 10955882
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Apr;88(4):1552-60
pubmed: 15778325
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Oct;90(10):4603-11
pubmed: 17881681
Br Vet J. 1996 May;152(3):321-31
pubmed: 8762608
Animal. 2014 Apr;8(4):650-9
pubmed: 24438690
J Dairy Sci. 2008 May;91(5):2089-97
pubmed: 18420640
Animals (Basel). 2015 Aug 06;5(3):687-701
pubmed: 26479381
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jan;88(1):110-20
pubmed: 15591373
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Feb;98(2):927-36
pubmed: 25497818
Vet Anim Sci. 2019 Sep 26;8:100080
pubmed: 32734097
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3319-25
pubmed: 23498009
Vet J. 2006 Sep;172(2):284-92
pubmed: 16005249
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2000 Mar;47(2):73-82
pubmed: 10803106
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):9382-9388
pubmed: 31351716
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Oct;78(10):2308-13
pubmed: 8598414
J Dairy Sci. 2006 May;89(5):1776-83
pubmed: 16606749
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Jun;85(6):1476-81
pubmed: 12146479
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 05;25(2):141-51
pubmed: 26110027
Br Vet J. 1995 Mar-Apr;151(2):157-80
pubmed: 8920112
Vet J. 2011 Dec;190(3):364-71
pubmed: 21169041
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Sep;84(9):1988-97
pubmed: 11573778
J Dairy Sci. 1997 Nov;80(11):2984-95
pubmed: 9406092
Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68
pubmed: 2720055
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Sep;86(9):2875-83
pubmed: 14507023