Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.
Adolescent
Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
/ diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ adverse effects
Belgium
Biomechanical Phenomena
Braces
Female
Hamstring Tendons
/ transplantation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recovery of Function
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture
Anterior cruciate ligament
Anterior cruciate ligament injury
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Anterior cruciate ligament repair
Knee
Orthopaedics
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Nov 2019
18 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
17
07
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
entrez:
20
11
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current gold standard for the treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is reconstruction with tendon graft. Recently, two surgical ACL repair techniques have been developed for treating an acute ACL rupture: Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS, Ligamys®) and Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA, InternalBrace™). We will conduct a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial which compares DIS, IBLA and reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. Subjects, aged 18-50 years, with a proximal, primary and repairable ACL rupture will be included. DIS is preferably performed within 4 weeks post-rupture, IBLA within 12 weeks and reconstruction after 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients are included in study 1 if they present within 0-4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible within 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 1 will be randomized to either DIS or IBLA. Patients are included in study 2 if they present after 4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible between 5 and 12 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 2 will be randomized to either IBLA or reconstruction. A total of 96 patients will be included, with 48 patients per study and 24 patients per study arm. Patients will be followed-up for 2 years. The primary outcome is change from baseline (pre-rupture) in International Knee Documentation Committee score to 6 months post-operatively. The main secondary outcomes are the EQ-5D-5 L, Tegner score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, isokinetic and proprioceptive measurements, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, return to work and sports, and re-rupture/failure rates. The statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The economic impact of the surgery techniques will be evaluated by the cost-utility analysis. The LIBRƎ study is to be conducted between 2018 and 2022. This LIBRƎ study protocol is the first study to compare DIS, IBLA and ACL reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. The outcomes of this study will provide data which could aid orthopaedic surgeons to choose between the different treatment options for the surgical treatment of an acute ACL rupture. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03441295. Date registered 13.02.2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The current gold standard for the treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is reconstruction with tendon graft. Recently, two surgical ACL repair techniques have been developed for treating an acute ACL rupture: Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS, Ligamys®) and Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA, InternalBrace™). We will conduct a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial which compares DIS, IBLA and reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit.
METHODS
METHODS
Subjects, aged 18-50 years, with a proximal, primary and repairable ACL rupture will be included. DIS is preferably performed within 4 weeks post-rupture, IBLA within 12 weeks and reconstruction after 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients are included in study 1 if they present within 0-4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible within 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 1 will be randomized to either DIS or IBLA. Patients are included in study 2 if they present after 4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible between 5 and 12 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 2 will be randomized to either IBLA or reconstruction. A total of 96 patients will be included, with 48 patients per study and 24 patients per study arm. Patients will be followed-up for 2 years. The primary outcome is change from baseline (pre-rupture) in International Knee Documentation Committee score to 6 months post-operatively. The main secondary outcomes are the EQ-5D-5 L, Tegner score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, isokinetic and proprioceptive measurements, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, return to work and sports, and re-rupture/failure rates. The statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The economic impact of the surgery techniques will be evaluated by the cost-utility analysis. The LIBRƎ study is to be conducted between 2018 and 2022.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This LIBRƎ study protocol is the first study to compare DIS, IBLA and ACL reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. The outcomes of this study will provide data which could aid orthopaedic surgeons to choose between the different treatment options for the surgical treatment of an acute ACL rupture.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03441295. Date registered 13.02.2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31739784
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2926-0
pii: 10.1186/s12891-019-2926-0
pmc: PMC6862787
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03441295']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
547Subventions
Organisme : Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
ID : T001017N
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13
pubmed: 11573919
BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):995-1001
pubmed: 16603564
Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):891-902
pubmed: 20044494
Phys Ther Sport. 2010 Aug;11(3):81-5
pubmed: 20673855
Acta Clin Belg. 2015 Jun;70(3):175-80
pubmed: 25579611
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1543-52
pubmed: 25157180
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1567-73
pubmed: 16870824
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Sep;9(5):302-6
pubmed: 11685363
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1845-51
pubmed: 27141865
J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1218-24
pubmed: 16705703
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Jan;29(1):39-48
pubmed: 10100120
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3923-3928
pubmed: 28210790
Gait Posture. 2006 Oct;24(2):190-5
pubmed: 16181781
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):13-20
pubmed: 30474692
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):567-577
pubmed: 30822124
Int J Sports Med. 2001 Jul;22(5):385-91
pubmed: 11510877
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:273-278
pubmed: 27728954
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2395-2400
pubmed: 29159673
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):599-605
pubmed: 22437658
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S208-28
pubmed: 22588746
Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-26
pubmed: 3785962
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Dec;30(6):601-7
pubmed: 25816826
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):80-90
pubmed: 30356896
Surg Technol Int. 2015 May;26:239-55
pubmed: 26055016
Arthrosc Tech. 2018 Jun 18;7(7):e747-e753
pubmed: 30094146
Sports Med. 2017 Feb;47(2):221-232
pubmed: 27402457
Arthroscopy. 1992;8(3):350-8
pubmed: 1418208
Sports Health. 2009 Jan;1(1):66-75
pubmed: 23015856
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 27;17:105
pubmed: 26920141
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;39(1):107-22
pubmed: 23312412
Am J Sports Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;19(1):42-7
pubmed: 2008929
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1243-1248
pubmed: 28318538
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):60-67
pubmed: 30382289
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):2419-26
pubmed: 19940314
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Sep;(198):43-9
pubmed: 4028566
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):804-14
pubmed: 23460328
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 03;7(6):2325967119849012
pubmed: 31211151
Res Sports Med. 2012 Jul;20(3-4):157-79
pubmed: 22742074
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Apr;25(4):1184-1190
pubmed: 26239862
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 May;37(5):245-52
pubmed: 17549953
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 13;16:27
pubmed: 25813910
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):477-80
pubmed: 24405792
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1215-21
pubmed: 24651979
Br J Sports Med. 2008 May;42(5):373-8
pubmed: 18182623
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59
pubmed: 24748500
Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36
pubmed: 2197679
Arthroscopy. 1998 Mar;14(2):197-205
pubmed: 9531133