Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for cT3N0 rectal cancer: any benefit over upfront surgery? A propensity score-matched study.
Aged
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
/ adverse effects
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Progression-Free Survival
Propensity Score
Rectal Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Adjuvant radiotherapy
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy
Rectal cancer
Surgery
T3N0
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
accepted:
29
10
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
20
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Benefits of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) are well known for locally advanced and/or node-positive rectal cancer, but the best timing for CRT has been less explored for cT3N0 patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability between neoadjuvant CRT and upfront surgery in patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer. A retrospective review of 105 patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer, staged by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan between 2011 and 2017, was performed: 42 (40.0%) were treated by neoadjuvant CRT and 63 (60.0%) by upfront surgery. Propensity score matching was performed to avoid selection bias, and Cox multivariate regression was used to analyze outcomes. The 5-year DFS probability was 87.5% in neoadjuvant CRT patients vs. 90.0% in upfront surgery cases (Log-rank p = 0.76). The 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival probability was respectively 96.8% vs. 96.3% (Log-rank p = 0.954). On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant CRT had no impact on DFS when compared to upfront surgery (adjusted HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.18-2.70, p = 0.613), but 61.9% of upfront surgery cases were treated by adjuvant chemo-radiation (adjusted HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.11-1.57, p = 0.196). The only independent predictor of improved DFS was age at diagnosis (adjusted HR 0.95, p = 0.017). CRT should be considered for cT3N0 patients, but its timing (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) seems not to affect the disease-free survival in the present cohort of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31741026
doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03446-4
pii: 10.1007/s00384-019-03446-4
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2161-2169Références
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;19(9):2822-32
pubmed: 22434243
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;26(3):746-755
pubmed: 30536129
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40
pubmed: 15496622
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602
pubmed: 30247332
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Feb;50(2):156-67
pubmed: 17180256
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):693-701
pubmed: 17968156
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595
pubmed: 30080730
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010 Jan;19(1):205-23
pubmed: 19914567
Clin Imaging. 2018 Jul - Aug;50:130-140
pubmed: 29414101
Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1497-1506
pubmed: 28295220
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Nov;105(2):214-9
pubmed: 23200410
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20
pubmed: 19269519
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;38(1):73-8
pubmed: 24491755
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jan;57(1):32-8
pubmed: 24316943
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30
pubmed: 19770376
Cancer. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):968-76
pubmed: 8780533
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Sep;25(9):1103-10
pubmed: 20544208
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):249-53
pubmed: 18513192
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12(6):575-82
pubmed: 21596621
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5644-50
pubmed: 16110023
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):817-25
pubmed: 11821466
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40
pubmed: 28881920