Comparative Evaluation of Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 with p16 Microsatellite Marker by PCR in Surgical Margins of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Immunohistochemistry Oral squamous cell carcinoma Surgical margin polymerase chain reaction p16 p16 microsatellite marker

Journal

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 03 07 2018
accepted: 25 10 2018
entrez: 20 11 2019
pubmed: 20 11 2019
medline: 20 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is most common oral cancer with multifactorial etiology. Surgical therapy is treatment of choice but known to have recurrence. The main reason for recurrence is associated with surgical margins which need to be tumor free. Changes at genetic level cannot be ascertained only through routine light microscopy in surgical margins, even though they are tumor free. Detection of early marker like p16 can help in predicting the risk of recurrence. Hence study aimed to detect p16 microsatellite marker (D9s1747) in surgical margins of oral squamous cell carcinoma and compare the same with p16 marker through immunohistochemistry. Total of 40 paraffin embedded tissue samples diagnosed and surgically treated cases of OSCC were included. From each sample one tumor proper and one surgical margin was obtained. From paraffin embedded tissue sample 2 sections of 4 µm thick was obtained from tumor proper and tumor margin. One section was stained with hematoxylin and eosin and other section was stained immunohistochemically using p16 antibody. DNA extraction was done for tumor proper and surgical margin tissue and PCR analysis was carried for p16 microsatellite marker (D91747). Out of 40 cases 37 cases showed positivity in tumor proper for p16 with IHC. Out of 37 cases 23 cases showed positivity for both tumor proper and surgical margin. There were 3 cases negative for tumor proper. Out of these 3 cases, 1 (33.3%) case was positive for surgical margin. Out of 40 cases 27 cases showed positivity for tumor proper with p16 microsatellite marker. Out of 27 cases 16 cases showed positivity for both tumor proper and surgical margin. There were 13 cases negative for tumor proper. However there were 8 (61.5%) cases negative which were in tumor proper but showed positivity for surgical margin. Other 5 cases were negative in both tumor proper and surgical margin. Our study reveals that surgical margins of OSCC exhibit alteration in p16 markers both by IHC and PCR techniques. p16 and p16 microsatellite marker detection in margins indicates field change. Further studies with larger sample size comparing expression with clinical and histological parameter and follow up has to be done to substantiate our findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31742049
doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1517-y
pii: 1517
pmc: PMC6848693
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

716-723

Informations de copyright

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018.

Références

Arch Iran Med. 2015 May;18(5):314-9
pubmed: 25959914
Head Neck. 2009 Nov;31(11):1423-30
pubmed: 19431196
Hum Pathol. 2016 May;51:64-74
pubmed: 27067784
Oral Oncol. 2011 Aug;47(8):702-8
pubmed: 21697000
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan;107(1):81-91
pubmed: 19101490
Head Neck Pathol. 2012 Dec;6(4):422-9
pubmed: 22801997
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar;44(3):232-40
pubmed: 24470584
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2012;53(1):89-93
pubmed: 22395505
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):722-730
pubmed: 28318929
Int J Oncol. 2004 Feb;24(2):249-55
pubmed: 14719099
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Feb;45(2):83-8
pubmed: 26260282
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Jun 1;10(11):3614-20
pubmed: 15173067
N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 16;332(7):429-35
pubmed: 7619114
F1000Prime Rep. 2014 Jun 02;6:44
pubmed: 24991421
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2014 Jan-Mar;57(1):24-30
pubmed: 24739827
Oral Oncol. 2009 Apr-May;45(4-5):394-401
pubmed: 18674952
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):40
pubmed: 28555375
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2909-14
pubmed: 10561370
J Oral Pathol Med. 2009 Jan;38(1):72-8
pubmed: 19192052
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):976-982
pubmed: 29449053
Acta Biochim Pol. 2016;63(3):505-9
pubmed: 27494112
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2015 Nov-Dec;23(10):724-32
pubmed: 25611240
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1824-6
pubmed: 24086928
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2796-802
pubmed: 23111707
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):431-439
pubmed: 27430224

Auteurs

Deepa Babji (D)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, 590010 Karnataka India.

Ramakant Nayak (R)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, 590010 Karnataka India.

Kishore Bhat (K)

Department of Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, 580010 Karnataka India.

Vijayalakshmi Kotrashetti (V)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, 590010 Karnataka India.

Jagadish Hosmani (J)

3Oral Pathology Division, Department of Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Gariger, P. O. Box 3263, Abha, 61471 Saudi Arabia.

Santosh Dindawar (S)

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, 580010 Karnataka India.

Smita Pattanshetty (S)

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, 590010 Karnataka India.

Classifications MeSH