Appropriateness of Otic Quinolone Use among Privately Insured US Patients.
Administration, Ophthalmic
Administration, Topical
Adult
Chi-Square Distribution
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Otitis Externa
/ diagnosis
Otitis Media
/ diagnosis
Outpatients
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Safety
Private Sector
Quinolones
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Treatment Outcome
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
off-label
otic quinolone
overprescribing
utilization
Journal
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1097-6817
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
24
4
2020
entrez:
20
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considering emerging safety concerns involving otic quinolones, we assessed the extent of otic quinolone use for questionable indications. Descriptive cross-sectional study of a national sample of privately insured patients. Outpatient encounters in the United States. Children and adults with outpatient pharmacy-dispensing claims for new prescriptions of otic or ophthalmic quinolones in 2017 were identified within the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and the Medicare Supplemental Database. Each dispensing ≥30 days apart constituted a unique episode. Only claims with supporting ear-related diagnoses on outpatient encounters ±3 days of dispensing were considered. Ophthalmic drops were excluded if eye-related diagnoses were found ±30 days. Prescribing was classified as appropriate, questionable, or undetermined. We found 214,897 episodes in 200,270 patients. Adults were twice as likely as children to have otic treatment with questionable indications (6.2% vs 3.0%). Sensitivity analyses with broader time windows to ascertain diagnoses showed similar proportions of questionable use. Otalgia and cerumen impaction constituted 90% of questionable indications. Family physicians (6.8%) and internists (8.0%) had higher percentages of questionable use than other specialties. Based on the demonstrated risks of quinolone ear drops, opportunities exist to decrease otic quinolone use, especially in adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31743076
doi: 10.1177/0194599819889607
doi:
Substances chimiques
Quinolones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102-107Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn