Healthcare providers' experiences in supporting community-living older adults to manage multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alberta
/ epidemiology
Caregivers
/ psychology
Community Health Services
/ standards
Disease Management
Female
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Home Care Services
/ standards
Humans
Independent Living
/ psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Chronic Conditions
/ epidemiology
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Qualitative Research
Self Care
/ psychology
Community care
Healthcare providers
Multiple chronic conditions
Older adults
Primary care
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2019
19 11 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
accepted:
04
11
2019
entrez:
21
11
2019
pubmed:
21
11
2019
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is becoming more prevalent as the population ages. Primary care and home care providers play key roles in caring for older adults with MCC such as facilitating complex care decisions, shared decision-making, and access to community health and support services. While there is some research on the perceptions and experiences of these providers in caring for this population, much of this literature is focused specifically on family physicians. Little is known about the experiences of other primary care and home care providers from multiple disciplines who care for this vulnerable group. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of primary and home care healthcare providers in supporting the care of older adults with MCC living in the community, and identify ways of improving care delivery and outcomes for this group. The study used an interpretive descriptive design. A total of 42 healthcare providers from two provinces in Canada (Ontario and Alberta) participated in individual semi-structured, face-to-face 60-min interviews. Participants represented diverse disciplines from primary care and home care settings. Inductive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The experiences and recommendations of healthcare providers managing care for older adults with MCC were organized into six major themes: (1) managing complexity associated with MCC, (2) implementing person-centred care, (3), supporting caregivers, (4) using a team approach for holistic care delivery, (5) encountering challenges and rewards, and (6) recommending ways to address the challenges of the healthcare system. Healthcare providers identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care to improve the delivery of care and outcomes for older adults with MCC and their family caregivers. Study findings suggest that community-based healthcare providers are using many relevant and appropriate strategies to support older adults living with the complexity of MCC, such as implementing person-centred care, supporting caregivers, working collaboratively with other providers, and addressing social determinants of health. However, they also identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is becoming more prevalent as the population ages. Primary care and home care providers play key roles in caring for older adults with MCC such as facilitating complex care decisions, shared decision-making, and access to community health and support services. While there is some research on the perceptions and experiences of these providers in caring for this population, much of this literature is focused specifically on family physicians. Little is known about the experiences of other primary care and home care providers from multiple disciplines who care for this vulnerable group. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of primary and home care healthcare providers in supporting the care of older adults with MCC living in the community, and identify ways of improving care delivery and outcomes for this group.
METHODS
The study used an interpretive descriptive design. A total of 42 healthcare providers from two provinces in Canada (Ontario and Alberta) participated in individual semi-structured, face-to-face 60-min interviews. Participants represented diverse disciplines from primary care and home care settings. Inductive thematic analysis was used for data analysis.
RESULTS
The experiences and recommendations of healthcare providers managing care for older adults with MCC were organized into six major themes: (1) managing complexity associated with MCC, (2) implementing person-centred care, (3), supporting caregivers, (4) using a team approach for holistic care delivery, (5) encountering challenges and rewards, and (6) recommending ways to address the challenges of the healthcare system. Healthcare providers identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care to improve the delivery of care and outcomes for older adults with MCC and their family caregivers.
CONCLUSIONS
Study findings suggest that community-based healthcare providers are using many relevant and appropriate strategies to support older adults living with the complexity of MCC, such as implementing person-centred care, supporting caregivers, working collaboratively with other providers, and addressing social determinants of health. However, they also identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31744477
doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2
pii: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2
pmc: PMC6862842
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
316Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : TTF 128261
Pays : Canada
Références
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1015-7
pubmed: 27626516
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):40
pubmed: 28143412
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Oct 26;16(1):177
pubmed: 27784289
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):235-42
pubmed: 20033622
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 08;14:133
pubmed: 24010523
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):231
pubmed: 30285641
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):142-51
pubmed: 22412006
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:23
pubmed: 25609174
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 04;17(6):e137
pubmed: 26043709
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Apr;29(4):670-9
pubmed: 24442332
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan;98(1):102-10
pubmed: 25448313
J Aging Health. 2018 Jun;30(5):778-799
pubmed: 28553806
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Mar;59(3):e148-55
pubmed: 23486816
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 13;3(9):e003610
pubmed: 24038011
Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Sep;10(4):430-9
pubmed: 21402176
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023345
pubmed: 30898800
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Dec;122:113-123
pubmed: 27833049
Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:75-83
pubmed: 23372025
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010
pubmed: 23687482
Neurology. 2016 Nov 15;87(20):2091-2098
pubmed: 27760870
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jan;74(1):45-60
pubmed: 28771854
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 16;5:443
pubmed: 22897907
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):207
pubmed: 30189846
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Jun;31(2):342-350
pubmed: 27439763
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Dec;62(12):2261-72
pubmed: 25516023
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 09;13:56
pubmed: 22697490
Healthc Policy. 2014 May;9(4):73-89
pubmed: 24973485
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jul;62(600):e503-10
pubmed: 22781998
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):549-62
pubmed: 25468153
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2623-33
pubmed: 18073358
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):75-80
pubmed: 20837819
Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):579-87
pubmed: 21613378