A rare anastomosis between the root of common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery: implications for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Arterial reconstruction
Pancreatic cancer
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Rare anastomosis
Journal
Surgical case reports
ISSN: 2198-7793
Titre abrégé: Surg Case Rep
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101662125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Nov 2019
19 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
18
05
2019
accepted:
04
11
2019
entrez:
21
11
2019
pubmed:
21
11
2019
medline:
21
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hepatic artery anomalies are often observed, and the variations are wide-ranging. We herein report a case of pancreatic cancer involving the common hepatic artery (CHA) that was successfully treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) without arterial reconstruction, thanks to anastomosis between the root of CHA and proper hepatic artery (PHA), which is a very rare anastomotic site. A 78-year-old woman was referred to our department for the examination of a tumor in the pancreatic head. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a low-density tumor of 40 mm in diameter located in the pancreatic head. The involvement of the common hepatic artery (CHA), the root of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), and portal vein was noted. Although such cases would usually require PD with arterial reconstruction of the CHA, it was thought that the hepatic arterial flow would be preserved by the anastomotic site between the root of the CHA and the PHA, even if the CHA was dissected without arterial reconstruction. PD with dissection of the CHA and PHA was safely completed without arterial reconstruction, and sufficient hepatic arterial flow was preserved through the anastomotic site between the CHA and PHA. We presented an extremely rare case of an anastomosis between the CHA and PHA in a patient with pancreatic cancer involving the CHA. Thanks to this anastomosis, surgical resection was successfully performed with sufficient hepatic arterial flow without arterial reconstruction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hepatic artery anomalies are often observed, and the variations are wide-ranging. We herein report a case of pancreatic cancer involving the common hepatic artery (CHA) that was successfully treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) without arterial reconstruction, thanks to anastomosis between the root of CHA and proper hepatic artery (PHA), which is a very rare anastomotic site.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
A 78-year-old woman was referred to our department for the examination of a tumor in the pancreatic head. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a low-density tumor of 40 mm in diameter located in the pancreatic head. The involvement of the common hepatic artery (CHA), the root of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA), and portal vein was noted. Although such cases would usually require PD with arterial reconstruction of the CHA, it was thought that the hepatic arterial flow would be preserved by the anastomotic site between the root of the CHA and the PHA, even if the CHA was dissected without arterial reconstruction. PD with dissection of the CHA and PHA was safely completed without arterial reconstruction, and sufficient hepatic arterial flow was preserved through the anastomotic site between the CHA and PHA.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We presented an extremely rare case of an anastomosis between the CHA and PHA in a patient with pancreatic cancer involving the CHA. Thanks to this anastomosis, surgical resection was successfully performed with sufficient hepatic arterial flow without arterial reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31745650
doi: 10.1186/s40792-019-0746-y
pii: 10.1186/s40792-019-0746-y
pmc: PMC6863997
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
180Références
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;25 Suppl 1:104-9
pubmed: 25910286
World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2384-91
pubmed: 17922256
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Nov-Dec;61(136):2345-8
pubmed: 25699380
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;17(1):186-93
pubmed: 19838756
Ann Surg. 1994 Jul;220(1):50-2
pubmed: 8024358
Am J Surg. 1966 Sep;112(3):337-47
pubmed: 5917302
Am Surg. 1989 Jul;55(7):421-6
pubmed: 2742226
JOP. 2010 Jul 05;11(4):348-57
pubmed: 20601809
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):35-37
pubmed: 28489166