Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.

accident prevention accidents, occupational equipment safety health personnel needlestick injuries occupational medicine

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 11 2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 11 2019
pubmed: 22 11 2019
medline: 11 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) involving healthcare workers (HCWs) are worldwide under surveillance since long time; the implementation of the European Directive 32/2010 regarding the mandatory use of safety-engineered devices (SEDs) seems to have reduced the number of these accidents. Our surveillance investigated the frequency and the modality of SED-related NSIs in the Piedmont region to verify changes in the epidemiology of these events. We analysed the exposure records of NSIs, device usage data and structural data of 42 acute care hospitals and compared conventional and safety devices. We calculated the accident rates per 100 000 needles and, as a measure of SED efficacy, the relative risk between the use of safety and non-safety devices with a 95% CI. We also described the dynamics of the NSIs and the most involved professional groups of HCWs, procedures and devices. Total and specific device accident rates for 100 000 needles were lower with the use of SEDs. In 2015-2016, there were 1640 NSIs, with a decreasing absolute number during the observation period; 18% were SEDs related. Half of the total accidents with SEDs occurred in the patient's room, and nurses were involved in 78% of the cases. The most involved devices were the butterfly needles and peripheral venous catheters, and the most involved procedures were venous sampling (40%) and phlebotherapy (16%). The exposures occurred mostly during the procedure, and 45% of the SED-related injuries occurred during the disposal of the device; 92% of the SEDs involved had a manual activation mechanism. In agreement with the results of other European studies, our results show that SEDs reduce the risk of percutaneous exposure of HCWs, but in introducing SEDs, we must select those with a higher level of safety (with a passive activation mechanism) and improve the healthcare staff training programmes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31748292
pii: bmjopen-2019-030576
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576
pmc: PMC6887025
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e030576

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):347-54
pubmed: 17619897
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1159-70
pubmed: 16575737
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 12602692
Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(2):199-205
pubmed: 8511514
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 01;16:458
pubmed: 27581947
Med Lav. 2007 Mar-Apr;98(2):145-55
pubmed: 17375607
JAMA. 1992 Jun 3;267(21):2899-904
pubmed: 1583758
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;25(7):548-55
pubmed: 15301026
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):18-23
pubmed: 17230383
AORN J. 2011 Mar;93(3):322-30
pubmed: 21353803
Br J Nurs. 2018 Sep 6;27(16):944-952
pubmed: 30187800
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Apr;12(4):211-3
pubmed: 2061578
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 09;(3):CD009740
pubmed: 24610008
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jun 28;153(12):1451-8
pubmed: 8512436
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120(15-16):486-92
pubmed: 18820853
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):402-7
pubmed: 20175681
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 16;366(7):670-1
pubmed: 22335760
Am J Infect Control. 2004 Dec;32(8):441-4
pubmed: 15573049
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;34(6):615-8
pubmed: 23651893
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Oct;151(10):2051-6
pubmed: 1929694
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Aug;63(4):445-51
pubmed: 16777264
J Prev Med Hyg. 2016;57(2):E110-4
pubmed: 27582628
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Dec;56(8):566-74
pubmed: 17065314
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016 Aug 23;6(3):227-237
pubmed: 27766172
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;25(7):536-42
pubmed: 15301024

Auteurs

Maria Chiara Ottino (MC)

Departement of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy mottino@unito.it.

Andrea Argentero (A)

Departement of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Pier Angelo Argentero (PA)

Hospital Prevention Infection Unit, Ospedale di Rivoli, Rivoli, Italy.

Giacomo Garzaro (G)

Departement of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Carla Maria Zotti (CM)

Departement of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH