ZTE MR-based attenuation correction in brain FDG-PET/MR: performance in patients with cognitive impairment.
Attenuation correction
Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)
Neurodegenerative dementia
PET/MR
ZTE MRI
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2019
accepted:
15
10
2019
revised:
28
08
2019
pubmed:
22
11
2019
medline:
8
9
2020
entrez:
22
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One of the main challenges of integrated PET/MR is to achieve an accurate PET attenuation correction (AC), especially in brain acquisition. Here, we evaluated an AC method based on zero echo time (ZTE) MRI, comparing it with the single-atlas AC method and CT-based AC, set as reference. Fifty patients (70 ± 11 years old, 28 men) underwent FDG-PET/MR examination (SIGNA PET/MR 3.0 T, GE Healthcare) as part of the investigation of suspected dementia. They all had brain computed tomography (CT), 2-point LAVA-flex MRI (for atlas-based AC), and ZTE-MRI. Two AC methods were compared with CT-based AC (CTAC): one based on a single atlas, one based on ZTE segmentation. Impact on brain metabolism was evaluated using voxel and volumes of interest-based analyses. The impact of AC was also evaluated through comparisons between two subgroups of patients extracted from the whole population: 15 patients with mild cognitive impairment and normal metabolic pattern, and 22 others with metabolic pattern suggestive of Alzheimer disease, using SPM12 software. ZTE-AC yielded a lower bias (3.6 ± 3.2%) than the atlas method (4.5 ± 6.1%) and lowest interindividual (4.6% versus 6.8%) and inter-regional (1.4% versus 2.6%) variabilities. Atlas-AC resulted in metabolism overestimation in cortical regions near the vertex and cerebellum underestimation. ZTE-AC yielded a moderate metabolic underestimation mainly in the occipital cortex and cerebellum. Voxel-wise comparison between the two subgroups of patients showed that significant difference clusters had a slightly smaller size but similar locations with PET images corrected with ZTE-AC compared with those corrected with CT ZTE-AC performed better than atlas-AC in detecting pathologic areas in suspected neurodegenerative dementia. • The ZTE-based AC improved the accuracy of the metabolism quantification in PET compared with the atlas-AC method. • The overall uptake bias was 21% lower when using ZTE-based AC compared with the atlas-AC method. • ZTE-AC performed better than atlas-AC in detecting pathologic areas in suspected neurodegenerative dementia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31748857
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06514-z
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06514-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1770-1779Références
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:346-359
pubmed: 27988322
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1440-1451
pubmed: 29457287
J Nucl Med. 2018 May;59(5):852-858
pubmed: 29084824
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
pubmed: 11771995
J Nucl Med. 2019 Nov;60(11):1649-1655
pubmed: 30979823
Semin Nucl Med. 2015 May;45(3):224-33
pubmed: 25841277
PET Clin. 2016 Apr;11(2):151-60
pubmed: 26952728
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
pubmed: 11516708
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;46(13):2746-2759
pubmed: 31264170
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:403-413
pubmed: 30010010
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 21;62(19):7814-7832
pubmed: 28837045
Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):976-83
pubmed: 16696474
J Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;59(10):1624-1629
pubmed: 29449446
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Oct 22;5(1):20
pubmed: 30345471
J Nucl Med. 2016 Dec;57(12):1927-1932
pubmed: 27339875
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Nov 30;164(2):143-53
pubmed: 18930634
J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(2):215-20
pubmed: 26493207
J Nucl Med. 2017 Nov;58(11):1873-1879
pubmed: 28473594
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 07;12:1005
pubmed: 30666184
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Dec;33(12):2332-41
pubmed: 25055381
Radiol Clin North Am. 2004 Nov;42(6):1017-32, vii
pubmed: 15488555
J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1258-64
pubmed: 27013697
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):107-14
pubmed: 25639956
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Jul;29(7):922-7
pubmed: 12111133
J Nucl Med. 2015 Mar;56(3):417-22
pubmed: 25678489