Verification of threshold for image intensity ratio analyses of late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of left atrial fibrosis in 1.5T scans.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnostic imaging
Atrial Function, Left
Atrial Remodeling
Case-Control Studies
Contrast Media
/ administration & dosage
Female
Fibrosis
Heart Atria
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Organometallic Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Predictive Value of Tests
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibroses
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Image intensity ratio
Left atrial late gadolinium enhancement
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2019
accepted:
03
11
2019
pubmed:
22
11
2019
medline:
23
6
2020
entrez:
22
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging left atrial late gadolinium enhancement (LA LGE) is increasing for fibrosis evaluation though the use is still limited to specialized centres due to complex image acquisition and lack of consensus on image analyses. Analysis of LA LGE with image intensity ratio (IIR) (pixel intensity of atrial wall normalized by blood pool intensity) provides an objective method to obtain quantitative data on atrial fibrosis. A threshold between healthy myocardium and fibrosis of 1.2 has previously been established in 3T scans. The aim of the study was to reaffirm this threshold in 1.5T scans. LA LGE was performed using a 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner on: 11 lone-AF patients, 11 age-matched healthy volunteers (aged 27-44) and 11 elderly patients without known history of AF but varying degrees of comorbidities. Mean values of IIR for all healthy volunteers +2SD were set as upper limit of normality and was reproduced to 1.21 and the original IIR-threshold of 1.20 was maintained. The degree of fibrosis in lone-AF patients [median 9.0% (IQR 3.9-12.0)] was higher than in healthy volunteers [2.8% (1.3-8.3)] and even higher in elderly non-AF [20.1% (10.2-35.8), p = 0.001]. The previously established IIR-threshold of 1.2 was reaffirmed in 1.5T LA LGE scans. Patients with lone AF presented with increased degrees of atrial fibrosis compared to healthy volunteers in the same age-range. Elderly patients with no history of AF showed significantly higher degrees of fibrosis compared to both groups with younger individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31748945
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01728-0
pii: 10.1007/s10554-019-01728-0
pmc: PMC7080681
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Organometallic Compounds
0
gadobutrol
1BJ477IO2L
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
513-520Références
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1184-91
pubmed: 23685170
Europace. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):371-377
pubmed: 26965439
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):1272-1279
pubmed: 27940935
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):270-8
pubmed: 25593109
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Mar;13(3):654-60
pubmed: 26569460
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 May;26(5):484-92
pubmed: 25727248
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Jan 31;20(1):8
pubmed: 29386064
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Mar 19;20(1):21
pubmed: 29554919
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;7(1):23-30
pubmed: 24363354
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jan;11(1):85-92
pubmed: 24096166
Circulation. 2009 Apr 7;119(13):1758-67
pubmed: 19307477
Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):690-5
pubmed: 17517928
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 May;29(5):740-746
pubmed: 29528532
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Dec;9(12):2003-9
pubmed: 23000671
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;248:161-165
pubmed: 28735758
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 May 3;20(1):30
pubmed: 29720202
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):17-29
pubmed: 29479568
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jun 7;35(22):1486-95
pubmed: 24419806
Circulation. 1999 Nov 9;100(19):1992-2002
pubmed: 10556226
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;57(7):831-8
pubmed: 21310320
Invest Radiol. 2006 Sep;41(9):661-7
pubmed: 16896300
Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1959-1965
pubmed: 29860416
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;8(2):e002769
pubmed: 25652181
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Oct 7;52(15):1263-71
pubmed: 18926331
Europace. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):180-189
pubmed: 28172967
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):734-737
pubmed: 29371431
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;9(2):142-8
pubmed: 26777218
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;10(8):
pubmed: 28790104
Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(35):2731-8
pubmed: 23761394
Open Heart. 2017 Jan 09;4(1):e000546
pubmed: 28123766
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Dec 20;15:105
pubmed: 24359544
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun;3(3):249-59
pubmed: 20335558
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):498-506
pubmed: 24496537
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Jan;22(1):16-22
pubmed: 20807271
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:351-7
pubmed: 25464485
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):891-903
pubmed: 21329834
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014 Oct 19;8(Suppl 1):25-30
pubmed: 25368540
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Oct;7(10):1475-81
pubmed: 20601148
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jul;7(7):653-63
pubmed: 24813966
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):396-403
pubmed: 23293924