Dose optimisation in paediatric radiography - Using regression models to investigate the relative impact of acquisition factors on image quality and radiation dose.

Digital radiography Exposure factor impact Paediatric dose reduction Pelvis radiography Regression analysis

Journal

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 30 01 2019
revised: 20 10 2019
accepted: 21 10 2019
pubmed: 22 11 2019
medline: 29 4 2020
entrez: 22 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the optimum pelvis X-ray acquisition factors for a 10-year-old child. Secondly, to evaluate the impact of each acquisition factor on image quality (IQ) and radiation dose. Images were acquired using a pelvis phantom and a range of acquisition parameters; e.g. tube potential, additional filtration and source-to-image distance (SID). Automatic exposure control (AEC) was used with two orientations (head towards/away from two outer chambers) and three different chamber selections. Visual IQ was evaluated using relative and absolute-VGA methods. Radiation doses were measured by placing a dosimeter on the anterior surface of the phantom. Regression analysis was used to determine optimum parameters. The optimised technique (178.8 µGy), with diagnostic IQ, was with 89kVp, 130 cm SID and with 1 mm Al + 0.1 mm Cu filtration. This technique was with the head towards the two outer AEC chambers. Regression analysis showed that SID had the lowest impact on IQ (β = 0.002 95% CI -0.001 to 0.005) and dose (β = -0.96 95% CI -0.40 to -1.53). The impact of filtration on dose (β = -76.24 95% CI -86.76 to -85.72) was higher than tube potential (β = -13.44 95% CI -14.34 to -12.53). The following impact ratios were higher on IQ than radiation dose: filtration/kVp; 11.28 times, filtration/SID; 7.01 times and kVp/SID; 0.62 times. Optimised parameters were identified as 89 kVp, 130 cm SID and with 1 mm Al + 0.1 mm Cu additional filtration. Regression analysis demonstrated that filtration and tube potential had the greatest effect on radiation dose and IQ, respectively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31751806
pii: S1120-1797(19)30485-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.034
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

61-68

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ali Mohammed Ali (A)

College of Health and Medical Technology, University of Al Zahraa for Women, Karbala, Iraq. Electronic address: a.h.m.a.mohammedali@edu.salford.ac.uk.

Peter Hogg (P)

School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: P.Hogg@salford.ac.uk.

Andrew England (A)

School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: A.England@salford.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH