Donor-site Morbidity after Retromolar Bone Harvesting Using a Standardised Press Fit Cylinder Protocol.
alveolar ridge augmentation
autologous bone graft
bone reconstruction
horizontal bone defect
press fit
trephine drill
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Nov 2019
19 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
18
08
2019
revised:
25
09
2019
accepted:
15
11
2019
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Precise fitting and immobilisation of bone transplants at the recipient site is of utmost importance for the healing process. With the help of the standardised Osseo Transfer System, the recipient site is adjusted to the graft, rather than vice versa as it is typically done. The aim of this study was to analyse donor-site morbidity after harvesting cylindrical bone grafts from the retromolar region using the Osseo Transfer System. The patient satisfaction with the surgical procedures was also evaluated. All patients treated with this standardised reconstruction method between 2006 and 2013 at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, were included in this study. Complications were recorded and evaluated. Bone graft success and patient satisfaction were documented with a questionnaire, and then confirmed by clinical and radiological follow-up examinations. Fifty-four patients were treated and 64 harvested cylindrical autologous bone grafts were transplanted. In all cases, dental implants could be inserted after bone healing. One patient lost an implant, associated with failure of the bone graft. Six patients who were examined continued to show neurological disorders in locally limited areas. No complete or long-term damage of the inferior alveolar nerve occurred. More than 94% (n = 52) of the patients were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with the results and would recommend this surgical treatment to other patients. The standardised Osseo Transfer was an effective treatment option for small and mid-sized alveolar ridge augmentations. A low donor-site morbidity rate and a high transplant success rate were verified. The Osseo Transfer System demonstrated to be a reliable surgical technique without major complications. We highly recommend this surgical augmentation procedure as a surgical treatment for local bone defects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31752347
pii: ma12223802
doi: 10.3390/ma12223802
pmc: PMC6887743
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):111-6
pubmed: 16519189
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S125-7
pubmed: 23946565
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;36(5):251-9
pubmed: 18448348
Quintessence Int. 2009 Apr;40(4):295-301
pubmed: 19417874
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Dec;36(6):425-8
pubmed: 9881783
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-64
pubmed: 10453672
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD003607
pubmed: 18646092
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Dec;49(12):1277-87
pubmed: 1955919
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;43(6):956-60
pubmed: 25964006
Periodontol 2000. 1998 Jun;17:22-35
pubmed: 10337310
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Feb;13(1):103-11
pubmed: 12005140
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9378325
pubmed: 28401166
J Periodontol. 1979 Apr;50 Suppl 4S:11-21
pubmed: 29538887
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Sep;44(3):213-20
pubmed: 25279342
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Jun;26(3):177-89
pubmed: 3165015
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):3
pubmed: 31293922
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S82-9
pubmed: 9917629
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):387-91
pubmed: 24503390
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Jun;23(3):277-85
pubmed: 12854778
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Apr;(174):28-42
pubmed: 6339139
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):688-97
pubmed: 26009921
J Prosthet Dent. 1971 Sep;26(3):266-79
pubmed: 4934947
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Jun;11(2):149-57
pubmed: 18657152
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):514-21
pubmed: 12453129