Quality of life and objective functional impairment in lumbar spinal stenosis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of moderators.
depression
disability
health-related quality of life
lumbar spinal stenosis
systematic review
well-being
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 11 2019
21 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
5
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spine disease associated with a strong impairment in various quality of life areas, particularly the ability to perform work-related activity. Depression is a condition frequently associated. There is no comprehensive review on quality of life and objective functional impairment in LSS. This paper presents the protocol of the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarising evidence about quality of life and functional impairment in patients with LSS compared with healthy controls. Comorbid depressive disorders, age, gender, LSS duration, disability, pain severity and study methodological quality will be investigated as moderators. The protocol is reported according to PRISMA-P guidelines. Studies will be included if they were conducted on patients aged 18 years old or older with primary LSS and if they reported data on differences in the levels of quality of life or objective functional impairment between patients with LSS and healthy controls. Independent reviewers will search published/unpublished studies through electronic databases and additional sources, will extract the data and assess the methodological quality. Random-effects meta-analysis will be carried out by calculating effect sizes as Cohen's A summary of the evidence on quality of life and functional impairment in LSS may suggest clinical and occupational health medicine strategies aimed to timely detect and prevent these outcomes. Higher percentages of patients with LSS with depression may be expected to be related to poorer quality of life. Depressive comorbidity might impact negatively on quality of life because it is associated with dysfunctional coping, disability and psychophysiological symptoms. The current review does not require ethics approval. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals. CRD42019132209.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spine disease associated with a strong impairment in various quality of life areas, particularly the ability to perform work-related activity. Depression is a condition frequently associated. There is no comprehensive review on quality of life and objective functional impairment in LSS. This paper presents the protocol of the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarising evidence about quality of life and functional impairment in patients with LSS compared with healthy controls. Comorbid depressive disorders, age, gender, LSS duration, disability, pain severity and study methodological quality will be investigated as moderators.
METHODS
The protocol is reported according to PRISMA-P guidelines. Studies will be included if they were conducted on patients aged 18 years old or older with primary LSS and if they reported data on differences in the levels of quality of life or objective functional impairment between patients with LSS and healthy controls. Independent reviewers will search published/unpublished studies through electronic databases and additional sources, will extract the data and assess the methodological quality. Random-effects meta-analysis will be carried out by calculating effect sizes as Cohen's
CONCLUSIONS
A summary of the evidence on quality of life and functional impairment in LSS may suggest clinical and occupational health medicine strategies aimed to timely detect and prevent these outcomes. Higher percentages of patients with LSS with depression may be expected to be related to poorer quality of life. Depressive comorbidity might impact negatively on quality of life because it is associated with dysfunctional coping, disability and psychophysiological symptoms.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The current review does not require ethics approval. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals.
REVIEW REGISTRATION
CRD42019132209.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31753889
pii: bmjopen-2019-032314
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032314
pmc: PMC6886937
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e032314Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2288-94
pubmed: 25971357
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Sep 1;43(17):1176-1183
pubmed: 29419714
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18(8):1187-93
pubmed: 19343375
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 15;36(8):677-82
pubmed: 21037530
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Feb;69(2):305-8
pubmed: 3805099
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Autoimmun Rev. 2016 Apr;15(4):325-34
pubmed: 26708168
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):837-46
pubmed: 24417814
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):216-7
pubmed: 11315247
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):54-61
pubmed: 24980586
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Feb 24;13:597-608
pubmed: 28280342
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Apr 16;14:1013-1023
pubmed: 29713171
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 May;158(5):1135-44
pubmed: 1533084
Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1951-7
pubmed: 17549525
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52
pubmed: 22588748
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97
pubmed: 21477993
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1276-1293
pubmed: 30831316
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e025213
pubmed: 31542731
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1236-41
pubmed: 7575718
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43
pubmed: 23830297
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;26(4):310-25
pubmed: 23216170
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Dec 28;5:71
pubmed: 18163905
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1232-7
pubmed: 12045523
Qual Life Res. 2009 Dec;18(10):1357-66
pubmed: 19916057
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 25;20(1):33
pubmed: 30803433
Qual Life Res. 1993 Dec;2(6):451-9
pubmed: 8161979
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Dec 23;2013:590652
pubmed: 24453878
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;96(10):1763-70
pubmed: 26101845
Spine J. 2017 Jun;17(6):807-813
pubmed: 27988343
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):84-91
pubmed: 11805642
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):18-25
pubmed: 26536443
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 15;127(12):1097-102
pubmed: 9412313
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016 Aug;24(3):523-39
pubmed: 27417399
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):818-25
pubmed: 18287604
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Apr 15;28(7):415-22
pubmed: 16507504
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 Mar;5(1):5-15
pubmed: 15967727
BMJ. 2016 Jan 04;352:h6234
pubmed: 26727925
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9
pubmed: 22209240
Psychosomatics. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):303-18
pubmed: 22748749
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939
pubmed: 27450481
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1361-72
pubmed: 12065987
J Pain. 2016 Jan;17(1):76-89
pubmed: 26476267
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120