Total hip arthroplasty planning.
digital templating
kinematic alignment
preoperative planning
spine–hip relation
total hip arthroplasty
Journal
EFORT open reviews
ISSN: 2058-5241
Titre abrégé: EFORT Open Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101695674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preoperative planning is mandatory to achieve the restoration of a correct and personalized biomechanics of the hip.The radiographic review is the first and fundamental step in the planning. Limb or pelvis malpositioning during the review results in mislead planning.Correct templating is possible using three different methods: acetate templating on digital X-ray, digital 2D templating on digital X-ray and 3D digital templating on CT scan.Time efficiency, costs, reproducibility and accuracy must be considered when comparing different templating methods. Based on these parameters, acetate templating should not be abandoned; digital templating allows a permanent record of planning and can be electronically viewed by different members of surgical team; 3D templating is intrinsically more accurate. There is no evidence in the few recently published studies that 3D templating impacts positively on clinical outcomes except in difficult cases.The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable intraoperative soft tissue reference to set cup position.Spine-hip relations in osteoarthritic patients undergoing hip joint replacement must be considered. Cite this article:
Identifiants
pubmed: 31754469
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180075
pii: 10.1302_2058-5241.4.180075
pmc: PMC6851526
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
626-632Informations de copyright
© 2019 The author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: CC reports being a consultant for Depuy Synthes, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.
Références
Hip Int. 2019 Jan;29(1):41-50
pubmed: 29772949
World J Orthop. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):30-35
pubmed: 28144576
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3752-9
pubmed: 25910779
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Mar 29;3(3):98-105
pubmed: 29657851
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):392-7
pubmed: 25453633
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Feb 21;3(2):39-44
pubmed: 29657844
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Nov;13(7):455-62
pubmed: 16272270
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):297-300
pubmed: 28974376
J Arthroplasty. 1992;7 Suppl:403-9
pubmed: 1431923
Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):711-6
pubmed: 24240519
Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Aug;76(4):432-42
pubmed: 20973347
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):269-72
pubmed: 11922371
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb;28(2):331-7
pubmed: 22854351
J Artif Organs. 2018 Sep;21(3):340-347
pubmed: 29611147
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1 Suppl A):37-43
pubmed: 26733639
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):601-607
pubmed: 28927561
Med Eng Phys. 2003 Jun;25(5):371-7
pubmed: 12711234
Arthroplast Today. 2017 May 03;3(4):289-293
pubmed: 29204499
HSS J. 2015 Feb;11(1):76-83
pubmed: 25737673
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Mar;23(3):253-9
pubmed: 18069102
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):263-267
pubmed: 28917617
Orthopedics. 2010 Sep 07;33(9):631
pubmed: 20839699