Fusion of Preoperative MRI and Postoperative FD-CT for Direct Evaluation of Cochlear Implants : An Analysis at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Cochlear implant Flat panel computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Merging Scalar translocation

Journal

Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 01 08 2019
accepted: 27 10 2019
pubmed: 23 11 2019
medline: 27 10 2021
entrez: 23 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic value of merging preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with postoperative flat-panel computed tomography (FD-CT) and compare it to standard postoperative FD-CT for assessment of cochlear implant (CI) insertion. The T2-weighted (T2w) constructive interference in steady state (CISS) data sets of preoperative 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scans of CI patients with both regular and adverse implant spiralization were co-registered with the corresponding postoperative FD-CT data sets using defined anatomic landmarks. These merged FD-CT/MRI volumes (CMV) were compared to the corresponding postoperative FD-CT MPRs in consensus reading with respect to qualitative, i.e. scala tympani spiralization, scala vestibuli spiralization, scalar translocation and quantitative, i.e. distance of the last electrode to the lateral cochlea wall (D1) distance of the 2nd/5th electrode to the basal cochlear wall (D2) and the transition point (TP) of the scalar translocation, parameters. In total 30 patients (n 1.5T MRI = 18 patients; n 3T MRI = 12 patients) were included in the analysis. In all cases both CMVs and FD-CT MPRs were generated. Qualitative analysis of intracochlear CI position with CMVs (both 1.5 T and 3 T) and FD-CT was equivalent: In 20 patients the CI showed a regular implant spiralization, in 10 cases a scalar translocation was identified with both CMVs and FD-CT. Quantitative analysis showed a high level of congruency between CMVs (both 1.5 T and 3T) and FD-CT for fusion accuracy (D1: mean FD-CT D1 = 1.30 ± 0.7 mm; mean CMV D1 = 1.27 ± 0.77 mm, correlation r = 0.94, p < 0.0001; D2: mean FD-CT D2 = 1.17 ± 0.34 mm; mean CMV D2 = 1.10 ± 0.31 mm, correlation r = 0.89, p < 0.0001) and TP of the scalar translocation (mean FD-CT = 126.0 ± 59.25°, mean CMV = 117.0 ± 52.82°, correlation r = 0.95, p < 0.0001). The co-registration of preoperative 1.5 and 3 T MRI with postoperative FD-CT enables a direct evaluation of the position of a CI equivalent to the current standard FD-CT. Despite the fact that CMV provided no additional diagnostic value in this series, regardless whether preoperative 1.5 or 3 T MRI was used for co-registration, it might help to simplify postoperative CI diagnostics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31754757
doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00853-6
pii: 10.1007/s00062-019-00853-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

729-737

Références

Lenarz T. Cochlear implant—state of the art. Laryngorhinootologie. 2017;96(S 01):S123–51.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101812
Lin K, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr.. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:634-8.
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000224095.63354.1a
Kiefer J, Weber A, Pfennigdorff T, von Ilberg C. Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2000;62:251-6.
doi: 10.1159/000027755
O’Connell BP, Hunter JB, Wanna GB. The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2016;1:169–74.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.42 pubmed: 5510268 pmcid: 5510268
Ellul S, Shelton C, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR. Preoperative cochlear implant imaging: is magnetic resonance imaging enough? Am J Otol. 2000;21:528–33.
Booth TN, Wick C, Clarke R, Kutz JW, Medina M, Gorsage D, Xi Y, Isaacson B. Evaluation of the Normal Cochlear Second Interscalar Ridge Angle and Depth on 3D T2-Weighted Images: a Tool for the Diagnosis of Scala Communis and Incomplete Partition Type II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:923–7.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5585 pubmed: 7410642 pmcid: 7410642
Talenti G, Manara R, Brotto D, D’Arco F. High-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance findings in cochlear hypoplasias and incomplete partition anomalies: a pictorial essay. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1089):20180120.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180120
Trimble K, Blaser S, James AL, Papsin BC. Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging before pediatric cochlear implantation? Developing an investigative strategy. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:317–24.
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000253285.40995.91
Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, Iro H, Hornung J, Doerfler A. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:443–52.
doi: 10.3109/00016480903292700
Struffert T, Hauer M, Banckwitz R, Köhler C, Royalty K, Doerfler A. Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1257–65.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3136-7
Neri E, Berrettini S, Salvatori L, Forli F, Franceschini SS, Bartolozzi C. 3‑D CT and MRI co-registration in the assessment of cochlear implantation. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:MT63-7.
Jacob R, Lissek F, Stelzig Y, Waldeck S, Veit D. Scalenwechsel der CI Elektrode: Eine Analyse der Beurteilungsqualität verschiedener Bildgebungen. Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 2018;97(S 02):10126.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1640390
Dragovic AS, Stringer AK, Campbell L, Shaul C, O’Leary SJ, Briggs RJ. Co-registration of cone beam CT and preoperative MRI for improved accuracy of electrode localization following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2018;19:147–52.
doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1419548
Sipari S, Iso-Mustajärvi M, Löppönen H, Dietz A. The Insertion Results of a Mid-scala Electrode Assessed by MRI and CBCT Image Fusion. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39:e1019-25.
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002045
Hinkmann FM, Voit HL, Anders K, Baum U, Seidensticker P, Bautz WA, Lell MM. Ultra-fast carotid CT-angiography: low versus standard volume contrast material protocol for a 128-slice CT-system. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:257-64.
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819b08a0
Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT, Leake PA, James C, Boëx C, Holden TA, Finley CC, Roland PS, Roland JT Jr, Haller M, Patrick JF, Jolly CN, Faltys MA, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:722–30.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0 pubmed: 2945386 pmcid: 2945386
Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, Neely JG, Saxon EA, Hullar TE, Finley CC. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2007;197:2–24.
doi: 10.1177/00034894071160S401
Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS, Dawant BM, Labadie RF. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2014;124 Suppl 6:S1-7.
doi: 10.1002/lary.24728 pubmed: 4209201 pmcid: 4209201
Boyer E, Karkas A, Attye A, Lefournier V, Escude B, Schmerber S. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:422–9.
doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000705
Fischer N, Pinggera L, Weichbold V, Dejaco D, Schmutzhard J, Widmann G. Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:372–7.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4189

Auteurs

Felix Eisenhut (F)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. felix.eisenhut@uk-erlangen.de.

Lava Taha (L)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Isabella Kleibe (I)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Joachim Hornung (J)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Heinrich Iro (H)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Arnd Doerfler (A)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Stefan Lang (S)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH