The impact of mechanical oesophageal deviation on posterior wall pulmonary vein reconnection.
Atrial fibrillation • Catheter ablation • Oesophageal deviation • Pulmonary vein isolation • Luminal oesophageal temperature monitoring
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2020
01 02 2020
Historique:
received:
16
07
2019
accepted:
18
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
23
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
During atrial fibrillation ablation, oesophageal heating typically prompts reduction or termination of radiofrequency energy delivery. We previously demonstrated oesophageal temperature rises are associated with posterior left atrial pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) during redo procedures. In this study, we assessed whether mechanical oesophageal deviation (MED) during an index procedure minimizes posterior wall PVRs during redo procedures. Patients in whom we performed a first-ever procedure followed by a clinically driven redo procedure were divided based on both the use of MED for oesophageal protection and the ablation catheter employed (force or non-force sensing) in the first procedure. The PVR sites were compared between MED using a force-sensing catheter (MEDForce), or no MED with a non-force (ControlNoForce) or force (ControlForce) sensing catheter. Despite similar clinical characteristics, the MEDForce redo procedure rate (9.2%, 26/282 patients) was significantly less than the ControlNoForce (17.2%, 126/734 patients; P = 0.002) and ControlForce (17.5%, 20/114 patients; P = 0.024) groups. During the redo procedure, the posterior PVR rate with MEDForce (2%, 1/50 PV pairs) was significantly less than with either ControlNoForce (17.7%, 44/249 PV pairs; P = 0.004) or ControlForce (22.5%, 9/40 PV pairs; P = 0.003), or aggregate Controls (18.3%, 53/289 PV pairs; P = 0.006). However, the anterior PVR rate with MEDForce (8%, 4/50 PV pairs) was not significantly different than Controls (aggregate Controls-3.5%, 10/289 PV pairs, P = 0.136; ControlNoForce-2.4%, 6/249 PV pairs, P = 0.067; ControlForce-10%, 4/40 PV pairs, P = 1.0). Oesophageal deviation improves the durability of the posterior wall ablation lesion set during AF ablation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31755937
pii: 5637791
doi: 10.1093/europace/euz303
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
232-239Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.