Estimation of Percentage of Patients With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Alterations Eligible for Off-label Use of Erdafitinib.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Genetic Variation
/ genetics
Humans
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Off-Label Use
/ statistics & numerical data
Pyrazoles
/ therapeutic use
Quinoxalines
/ therapeutic use
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Urologic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When a novel drug is granted accelerated approval, both its on-label and off-label uses must be taken into account. To estimate the potential upper bound of off-label use of erdafitinib to treat advanced cancer with fibroblast growth factor receptor gene (FGFR) alterations, compare it to the upper bound of on-label use in urothelial cancer, and to review studies that may support off-label use. This cross-sectional study used frequency data on FGFR alterations by cancer type and the estimated number of deaths from all cancers for 2019 in the United States. Mortality statistics were used as surrogates for patients with advanced cancer. Analysis was conducted in May 2019. Percentage of patients with an FGFR2 or FGFR3 alteration. Estimated number of patients with advanced cancer expressing an FGFR2 or FGFR3 alteration eligible for off-label use of erdafitinib by cancer type; number of studies investigating FGFR-targeting drugs for patients with cancer; and number of ongoing clinical trials on erdafitinib by cancer type. A total of 15 cancer types had reported FGFR alterations. Of 455 440 estimated patients who died of cancer in 2019, 17 019 (3.7%) were estimated to have FGFR2 or FGFR3 alterations. Of these patients, 12 955 (76.1%) could be eligible for off-label treatment with erdafitinib. A total of 29 completed studies evaluated FGFR-targeting drugs in 11 cancer types, and 10 ongoing studies are studying erdafitinib for different oncological indications. This study indicates that the potential for off-label use of FGFR inhibitors such as erdafitinib spans a number of cancer types and a large patient population. Systematic trials exploring off-label uses may be desirable for drugs that target clear, identifiable molecular alterations because this may be more efficient than off-label use in identifying clinical scenarios where the agent has activity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31755953
pii: 2755870
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16091
pmc: PMC6902826
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Pyrazoles
0
Quinoxalines
0
erdafitinib
890E37NHMV
FGFR2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
FGFR3 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1916091Références
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1316-1324
pubmed: 29177434
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(7):1581-9
pubmed: 27100354
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 1;19(13):3693-702
pubmed: 23658459
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Dec;15(12):1456-1459
pubmed: 29223982
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):157-165
pubmed: 27870574
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 15;21(14):3307-17
pubmed: 25609060
J Neurooncol. 2013 Jan;111(2):205-12
pubmed: 23184145
Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):744-750
pubmed: 31011206
Semin Oncol. 2016 Feb;43(1):9-12
pubmed: 26970119
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):1257-68
pubmed: 23339124
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 10;19(1):18
pubmed: 28183331
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Jun;42(3):251-258
pubmed: 28164359
Cancer. 2016 Oct;122(19):3024-31
pubmed: 27315356
Respirol Case Rep. 2018 Nov 08;7(1):e00383
pubmed: 30455955
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):338-348
pubmed: 31340094
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 01;8:45
pubmed: 29546033
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;20(11):3012-22
pubmed: 24691021
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1093-1098
pubmed: 29710180
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):15014-15022
pubmed: 28122360
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):e81-e86
pubmed: 26868357
Cancer Med. 2019 Sep;8(12):5574-5576
pubmed: 31397113
Ann Oncol. 2014 Nov;25(11):2244-51
pubmed: 25193991
Target Oncol. 2017 Aug;12(4):463-474
pubmed: 28589492
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Oct;135(1):38-43
pubmed: 25019571
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e192535
pubmed: 31050774
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1559-60
pubmed: 20444848
BMJ. 2018 Mar 7;360:k668
pubmed: 29514787
Nature. 2016 Sep 07;537(7619):S63
pubmed: 27602743
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3401-8
pubmed: 26324363
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 1;17(23):7451-61
pubmed: 21976540
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):252-263
pubmed: 28034880
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;7(2):253-7
pubmed: 27081648
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Nov;14(11):2441-51
pubmed: 26351323
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Dec;135(3):441-5
pubmed: 25312396
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):259-67
pubmed: 26373574
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1289-94
pubmed: 27682039
Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018 Apr 2;4(2):
pubmed: 29588307
J Neurooncol. 2015 Jan;121(2):297-302
pubmed: 25338318
Chest. 1989 Feb;95(2 Suppl):2S-4S
pubmed: 2914516
J Cutan Pathol. 2018 Oct;45(10):786-790
pubmed: 30021048
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 1;18(9):2658-67
pubmed: 22421192