Bridging the food security gap: an information-led approach to connect dietary nutrition, food composition and crop production.
cultivar variation
databases
food supply
genetic resources
knowledge representation
nutritional security
Journal
Journal of the science of food and agriculture
ISSN: 1097-0010
Titre abrégé: J Sci Food Agric
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2020
15 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
16
04
2019
revised:
18
10
2019
accepted:
18
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
entrez:
23
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Food security is recognized as a major global challenge, yet human food-chain systems are inherently not geared towards nutrition, with decisions on crop and cultivar choice not informed by dietary composition. Currently, food compositional tables and databases (FCT/FCDB) are the primary information sources for decisions relating to dietary intake. However, these only present single mean values representing major components. Establishment of a systematic controlled vocabulary to fill this gap requires representation of a more complex set of semantic relationships between terms used to describe nutritional composition and dietary function. We carried out a survey of 11 FCT/FCDB and 177 peer-reviewed papers describing variation in nutritional composition and dietary function for food crops to identify a comprehensive set of terms to construct a controlled vocabulary. We used this information to generate a Crop Dietary Nutrition Data Framework (CDN-DF), which incorporates controlled vocabularies systematically organized into major classes representing nutritional components and dietary functions. We demonstrate the value of the CDN-DF for comparison of equivalent components between crop species or cultivars, for identifying data gaps and potential for formal meta-analysis. The CDN-DF also enabled us to explore relationships between nutritional components and the functional attributes of food. We have generated a structured crop dietary nutrition data framework, which is generally applicable to the collation and comparison of data relevant to crop researchers, breeders, and other stakeholders, and will facilitate dialogue with nutritionists. It is currently guiding the establishment of a more robust formal ontology. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Food security is recognized as a major global challenge, yet human food-chain systems are inherently not geared towards nutrition, with decisions on crop and cultivar choice not informed by dietary composition. Currently, food compositional tables and databases (FCT/FCDB) are the primary information sources for decisions relating to dietary intake. However, these only present single mean values representing major components. Establishment of a systematic controlled vocabulary to fill this gap requires representation of a more complex set of semantic relationships between terms used to describe nutritional composition and dietary function.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We carried out a survey of 11 FCT/FCDB and 177 peer-reviewed papers describing variation in nutritional composition and dietary function for food crops to identify a comprehensive set of terms to construct a controlled vocabulary. We used this information to generate a Crop Dietary Nutrition Data Framework (CDN-DF), which incorporates controlled vocabularies systematically organized into major classes representing nutritional components and dietary functions. We demonstrate the value of the CDN-DF for comparison of equivalent components between crop species or cultivars, for identifying data gaps and potential for formal meta-analysis. The CDN-DF also enabled us to explore relationships between nutritional components and the functional attributes of food.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We have generated a structured crop dietary nutrition data framework, which is generally applicable to the collation and comparison of data relevant to crop researchers, breeders, and other stakeholders, and will facilitate dialogue with nutritionists. It is currently guiding the establishment of a more robust formal ontology. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1495-1504Subventions
Organisme : Southern Cross University
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture - Trends and Challenges. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017.
Ghattas H. Food Security and Nutrition in the Context of the Nutrition Transition. 2014.
Hwalla N, El Labban S and Bahn RA, Nutrition security is an integral component of food security. Front Life Sci 9:167-172 (2016).
WHO. Health topics. Nutrition 2018 [Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/nutrition/en/.
GLOPAN. Food Systems and Diets: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century. 2016.
Béné C, Oosterveer P, Lamotte L, Brouwer ID, de Haan S, Prager SD et al., When food systems meet sustainability - Current narratives and implications for actions. World Dev 113:116-130 (2019).
Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC, van Eekeren N and Nuijten E, Towards resilience through systems-based plant breeding: A review. Agron Sustainable Dev 38:42 (2018).
Lee H, Bogner C, Lee S and Koellner T, Crop selection under price and yield fluctuation: Analysis of agro-economic time series from South Korea. Agr Syst 148:1-11 (2016).
Dwivedi SL, Lammerts van Bueren ET, Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Upadhyaya HD and Ortiz R, Diversifying food systems in the pursuit of sustainable food production and healthy diets. Trends Plant Sci 22:842-856 (2017).
Khoury CK, Bjorkman AD, Dempewolf H, Ramirez-Villegas J, Guarino L, Jarvis A et al., Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:4001 (2014).
Elliot P, Kingwell R, Carter C, Yamamoto M and White P, Western Australia's noodle wheat industry, in Current Status and Future Challenges. Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, Autralia (2015).
Asrat S, Yesuf M, Carlsson F and Wale E, Farmers' preferences for crop variety traits: Lessons for on-farm conservation and technology adoption. Ecol Econ 69:2394-2401 (2010).
Gamboa C, Van den Broeck G and Maertens M, Smallholders' Preferences for Improved Quinoa Varieties in the Peruvian Andes. Sustainability 10:3735 (2018).
DeFries R, Mondal P, Singh D, Agrawal I, Fanzo J, Remans R et al., Synergies and trade-offs for sustainable agriculture: Nutritional yields and climate-resilience for cereal crops in Central India. Glob Food Sec 11:44-53 (2016).
Burchi F, Fanzo J and Frison E, The role of food and nutrition system approaches in tackling hidden hunger. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:358-373 (2011).
Sands DC, Morris CE, Dratz EA and Pilgeram A, Elevating optimal human nutrition to a central goal of plant breeding and production of plant-based foods. Plant Sci 177:377-389 (2009).
Acheampong Patricia P, Owusu V and Nurah G, How does farmer preference matter in crop variety adoption? The case of improved cassava varieties' adoption in Ghana. Open Agriculture 3:466 (2018).
Laborte AG, Paguirigan NC, Moya PF, Nelson A, Sparks AH and Gregorio GB, Farmers' preference for rice traits: insights from farm surveys in Central Luzon, Philippines, 1966-2012. PLoS One 10:e0136562 (2015).
Christinck A and Weltzien E, Plant breeding for nutrition-sensitive agriculture: an appraisal of developments in plant breeding. Food Security 5:693-707 (2013).
Kaine G, Lengley S and Seymour E, A Model of FArmers' IDEntification of Valuable Traits and Trait Selection Decisions. Australia ictorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, Australia (2011).
Mozaffarian D, Angell SY, Lang T and Rivera JA, Role of government policy in nutrition-barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. BMJ 361:k2426 (2018).
FAO. Report on the Commissions on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy; 2013. Contract No.: CGRFA-14/13/Report.
Smith KW, Bronselaer A, De Baets B, De Tre G, Van Camp J, Van Damme P et al., Scoping Study to Determine the Data Sources on Biodiversity in Diet and Food Intake. Final report. Ghent University, Belgium (2014).
Penington JAT, Stumbo PJ, Murphy SP, McNutt SW, Eldridge AL, McCabe-Sellers BJ et al., Food composition data: the foundation of dietetic practice and research. J Am Diet Assoc 107:2105-2113 (2007).
Haytowitz DB and Pehrsson PR, USDA's National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program (NFNAP) produces high-quality data for USDA food composition databases: two decades of collaboration. Food Chem 238:134-138 (2018).
Clancy AK, Woods K, McMahon A and Probst Y, Food composition database format and structure: a user focused approach. PLoS ONE 10 (2015).
Finglas PM, Berry R and Astley S, Assessing and improving the quality of food composition databases for nutrition and health applications in europe: the contribution of EuroFIR. Adv Nutr 5:608S-614S (2014).
Marconi S, Durazzo A, Camilli E, Lisciani S, Gabrielli P, Aguzzi A et al., Food composition databases: considerations about complex food matrices. Foods 7:2 (2018).
Roberfroid MB, Global view on functional foods: European perspectives. Br J Nutr 88:S133-S138 (2002).
Siró I, Kápolna E, Kápolna B and Lugasi A, Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance-A review. Appetite 51:456-467 (2008).
Spence JT, Challenges related to the composition of functional foods. J Food Compos Anal 19:S4-S6 (2006).
Miller EL. Protein Nutrition Requirements of Farmed Livestock and Dietary Supply Rome, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2004.
Nutritional Requirements of Pigs [Internet]. MSD. 2019.
Saxena P, Feed formulation software: A comparative study. 1:20-21 (2010).
Lange MC, Lemay DG and German JB, A multi-ontology framework to guide agriculture and food towards diet and health. J Sci Food Agric 87:1427-1434 (2007).
Spasić I, Schober D, Sansone S-A, Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Kell DB and Paton NW, Facilitating the development of controlled vocabularies for metabolomics technologies with text mining. BMC bioinformatics 9:S5-S (2008).
Lemay DG, Zivkovic AM and German JB, Building the bridges to bioinformatics in nutrition research. Am J Clin Nutr 86:1261-1269 (2007).
Matteis L, Chibon P-Y, Espinosa H, Skofic M, Finkers R, Bruskiewich R et al., Vocabulary For Crop-related Concepts. Crop Ontology, Montpellier, France (2013).
Dooley DM, Griffiths EJ, Gosal GS, Buttigieg PL, Hoehndorf R, Lange MC et al., Food On: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration. npj Sci Food 2:23 (2018).
OntoFood [Internet]. NCBO. 2015 [cited 26 October, 2018]. Available from: https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/OF.
Andrés-Hernández L, Baten A, Azman Halimi R, Walls R and King GJ, Knowledge representation and data sharing to unlock crop variation for nutritional food security. Crop Sci (2019). doi:10.2135/cropsci2019.06.0375
Thavarajah D, Thavarajah P. 2011 U.S Pulse Quality Report. 2011.
Hall C. 2016 U.S Pulse Quality Survey. 2016.
USDA Food Composition Database [Internet]. USDA. 2019 [cited 26 May, 2017]. Available from: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/http://fdc.nal.usda.gov.
Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V et al., ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D1214-D1219 (2016).
Greenfield H and Southgate DAT, Food Composition Data, in Production, Mangement and Use, 2nd edn. FAO, Rome (2003).
Canadian Nutrient FIle [Internet]. Health Canada. 2015 [cited 1st February 2018]. Available from: https://food-nutrition.canada.ca/cnf-fce/index-eng.jsp.
National Health and Medical Research Council AGDoHaA, Health. NZMo, Nutrient reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Australian Government, Australia, p. 2017 (2017).
Pinchen H, Powell N, Weiner D, Finglas P. McCance and Widdowson's Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset. In: England PH, editor. 7ed. UK 2019.
Frida Public Foods Database [Internet]. 2019 [cited 12 January, 2019]. Available from: http://frida.fooddata.dk/index.php?lang=en
Brazilian Food Composition Tables [Internet]. USP. 2017 [cited 30th November, 2017]. Available from: http://www.fcf.usp.br/tbca/
Thai Food Composition Database 2015 [Internet]. Mahidol University 2018 [cited 22nd June, 2018]. Available from: http://www.inmu.mahidol.ac.th/thaifcd/home.php.
Lisa L, Hauta-alus H, Mutanen M. Food Composition Tables for Mozambique. 2011 October 2011.
Musaiger AO. Food Composition Tables for Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain; 2011.
FAO/INFOODS/IZiNCG Global Food Composition Database for Phytate Version 1.0 - PhyFoodComp 1.0. [Internet]. FAO. 2018.
FAO. BioFoodComp Food Composition Database for Biodiversity. In: FAO/INFOODS, editor. 4.0 ed2017.
Burlingame B, Charrondiere R and Mouille B, Food composition is fundamental to the cross-cutting initiative on biodiversity for food and nutrition. J Food Compos Anal 22:361-365 (2009).
Lutaladio N, Burlingame B and Crews J, Horticulture, biodiversity and nutrition. J Food Compos Anal 23:481-485 (2010).
Lachat C, Raneri JE, Smith KW, Kolsteren P, Van Damme P, Verzelen K et al., Dietary species richness as a measure of food biodiversity and nutritional quality of diets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:127-132 (2018).
Allen S and de Brauw A, Nutrition sensitive value chains: theory, progress, and open questions. Glob Food Sec 16:22-28 (2018).
Kennedy G and Burlingame B, Analysis of food composition data on rice from a plant genetic resources perspective. Food Chem 80:589-596 (2003).
Charrondière UR, Stadlmayr B, Rittenschober D, Mouille B, Nilsson E, Medhammar E et al., FAO/INFOODS food composition database for biodiversity. Food Chem 140:408-412 (2013).
Martin CL, Murphy SP and Au DLM, Compiling glycemic index and glycemic load values for addition to a food composition database. J Food Compos Anal 21:469-473 (2008).
Dahdouh S, Grande F, Espinosa SN, Vincent A, Gibson R, Bailey K et al., Development of the FAO/INFOODS/IZINCG Global Food Composition Database for Phytate. J Food Compos Anal 78:42-48 (2019).
Sebastian RS, Enns CW, Goldman JD, Martin CL, Steinfeldt LC, Murayi T et al., A New database facilitates characterization of flavonoid intake, sources, and positive associations with diet quality among us adults. J Nutr 145:1239 (2015).
Bouis HE and Saltzman A, Improving nutrition through biofortification: A review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016. Glob Food Sec 12:49-58 (2017).
Drewnowski A, Dwyer J, King JC and Weaver CM, A proposed nutrient density score that includes food groups and nutrients to better align with dietary guidance. Nutr Rev 77:404-416 (2019).
Nafziger ED, Soybean agronomy, in Reference Module in Food Science. Elsevier, (2016).
Carter TE, Rzewnicki PE, Burton JW, Villagarcia MR, Bowman DT, Taliercio E et al., Registration of N6202 Soybean Germplasm with High Protein, Favorable Yield Potential, Large Seed, and Diverse Pedigree. J Plant Regist 4:73-79 (2010).
FAO. International Food composition tables/ databse directory 2017. Available from: http://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/tables-and-databases/en/
Rotundo JL and Westgate ME, Meta-analysis of environmental effects on soybean seed composition. Field Crops Res 110:147-156 (2009).
Tapsell LC, Neale EP, Satija A and Hu FB, Foods, nutrients, and dietary patterns: interconnections and implications for dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr 7:445-454 (2016).
Mahajan PV, Caleb OJ, Singh Z, Watkins CB and Geyer M, Postharvest treatments of fresh produce. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 372:20130309 (2014).
Platel K and Srinivasan K, Bioavailability of Micronutrients from Plant Foods: an Update. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56:1608-1619 (2016).
Azman Halimi R, Barkla BJ, Mayes S and King GJ, The potential of the underutilized pulse bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) for nutritional food security. J Food Compos Anal 77:47-59 (2019).
Xue Z, Wang C, Zhai L, Yu W, Chang H, Kou X et al., Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.), soybean (Glycine max L.) and black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the germination process. Czech J Food Sci 34:68-78 (2016).
Yao Y, Cheng X, Wang L, Wang S and Ren G, Biological potential of sixteen legumes in China. Int J Mol Sci 12:7048-7058 (2011).
Sandhu KS and Lim S-T, Digestibility of legume starches as influenced by their physical and structural properties. Carbohydr Polym 71:245-252 (2008).
Birt DF, Boylston T, Hendrich S, Jane J-L, Hollis J, Li L et al., Resistant starch: promise for improving human health. Adv Nutr 4:587 (2013).
WHO. Global Report on Diabetes. 2016.
Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Jenkins ALJ, Thorne M, Lee R, Kalmusky J et al., The glycaemic index of foods tested in diabetic patients: a new basis for carbohydrate exchange favouring the use of legumes. Diabetologia 24:257-264 (1983).
Ratnaningsih N, Suparmo EH and Marsono Y, In vitro Starch Digestibility and Estimated Glycemic Index of Indonesian Cowpea Starch (Vigna unguiculata). Pak J Nutr 16:1-8 (2017).
Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3:1-9 (2016).
Selby P, Abbeloos R, Backlund JE, Consortium oboTB et al., BrAPI-an application programming interface for plant breeding applications. Bioinformatics 35:4147-4155 (2019).
Ćwiek-Kupczyńska H, Altmann T, Arend D, Arnaud E, Chen D, Cornut G et al., Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: minimum information requirements and formatting. Plant Methods 12:44 (2016).
Yang C, Ambayo H, Baets BD, Kolsteren P, Thanintorn N, Hawwash D et al., An ontology to standardize research output of nutritional epidemiology: from paper-based standards to linked content. Nutrients 11:1300 (2019).
DivSeek. Divseek International Network: Global Institute for Food Security, University of Sasketchewan Canada; [Available from: http://www.divseek.org/.
Meyer RS, Encouraging metadata curation in the Diversity Seek initiative. Nat Plants 1:15099 (2015).
Xu BJ, Yuan SH and Chang SKC, Comparative analyses of phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity, and color of cool season legumes and other selected food legumes. J Food Sci 72:S167-S177 (2007).
Xu B and Chang SK, Comparative study on antiproliferation properties and cellular antioxidant activities of commonly consumed food legumes against nine human cancer cell lines. Food Chem 134:1287-1296 (2012).
Lee JH, Jeon JK, Kim SG, Kim SH, Chun T and Imm JY, Comparative analyses of total phenols, flavonoids, saponins and antioxidant activity in yellow soy beans and mung beans. Int J Food Sci Technol 46:2513-2519 (2011).
Zia-Ul-Haq M, Iqbal S, Ahmad S, Bhanger MI, Wiczkowski W and Amarowicz R, Antioxidant potential of Desi chickpea varieties commonly consumed in Pakistan. J Food Lipids 15:326-342 (2008).
Zia-Ul-Haq M, Ahmad S, Amarowicz R and De Feo V, Antioxidant activity of the extracts of some cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.) cultivars commonly consumed in Pakistan. Molecules 18:2005-2017 (2013).