8p deletions in renal cell carcinoma are associated with unfavorable tumor features and poor overall survival.


Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 06 05 2019
revised: 02 07 2019
accepted: 25 09 2019
pubmed: 24 11 2019
medline: 15 4 2021
entrez: 24 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

8p deletions are common in renal cell carcinoma. To study their prognostic impact and association with kidney cancer phenotype, a tissue microarray with 1,809 cancers was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for 8p21 copy numbers. One thousand four hundred and seventy four interpretable tumors showed substantial differences between renal cancer subtypes. That 8p deletion was only seen in 1 (0.5%) of 216 papillary carcinomas underscores the biologic uniqueness of papillary kidney cancer, which is also defined by a highly distinct morphology. 8p deletions were found in 13.2% of 976 clear cell carcinomas, 7.8% of 77 chromophobe carcinomas, 0.8% of 119 oncocytomas, but also in several rare tumor entities including 1 of 4 collecting duct cancers, 1 of 3 multilocular cystic clear cell renal cell neoplasm of low malignancy, 2 of 10 Xp11.2 translocation cancers, 3 of 18 not otherwise specified carcinomas, and 1 analyzed medullary carcinoma. In clear cell carcinomas, 8p deletions were significantly associated with higher International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) grading (P = 0.0014), Fuhrman (P = 0.0003) and Thoenes grade (P = 0.0033), advanced tumor stage (P = 0.0002), large tumor diameter (P = 0.0019), distant metastases (P = 0.0183), overall survival (P = 0.0394), and recurrence free survival (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the prognostic role of 8p deletions was not independent of established clinic-pathological parameters. In conclusion, 8p deletions are strongly linked to tumor aggressiveness in clear cell kidney cancer. Because 8p deletions are easy to measure by fluorescence in situ hybridization, 8p deletion assessment, most likely in combination with other parameters, may have a role in future prognosis assessment in clear cell kidney cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND METHODS
8p deletions are common in renal cell carcinoma. To study their prognostic impact and association with kidney cancer phenotype, a tissue microarray with 1,809 cancers was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for 8p21 copy numbers.
RESULTS
One thousand four hundred and seventy four interpretable tumors showed substantial differences between renal cancer subtypes. That 8p deletion was only seen in 1 (0.5%) of 216 papillary carcinomas underscores the biologic uniqueness of papillary kidney cancer, which is also defined by a highly distinct morphology. 8p deletions were found in 13.2% of 976 clear cell carcinomas, 7.8% of 77 chromophobe carcinomas, 0.8% of 119 oncocytomas, but also in several rare tumor entities including 1 of 4 collecting duct cancers, 1 of 3 multilocular cystic clear cell renal cell neoplasm of low malignancy, 2 of 10 Xp11.2 translocation cancers, 3 of 18 not otherwise specified carcinomas, and 1 analyzed medullary carcinoma. In clear cell carcinomas, 8p deletions were significantly associated with higher International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) grading (P = 0.0014), Fuhrman (P = 0.0003) and Thoenes grade (P = 0.0033), advanced tumor stage (P = 0.0002), large tumor diameter (P = 0.0019), distant metastases (P = 0.0183), overall survival (P = 0.0394), and recurrence free survival (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the prognostic role of 8p deletions was not independent of established clinic-pathological parameters. In conclusion, 8p deletions are strongly linked to tumor aggressiveness in clear cell kidney cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Because 8p deletions are easy to measure by fluorescence in situ hybridization, 8p deletion assessment, most likely in combination with other parameters, may have a role in future prognosis assessment in clear cell kidney cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31757738
pii: S1078-1439(19)30375-8
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.024
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

43.e13-43.e20

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Till Eichenauer (T)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

David C Bannenberg (DC)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Martina Kluth (M)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Corinna Wittmer (C)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Franziska Büscheck (F)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Katharina Möller (K)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

David Dum (D)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Christoph Fraune (C)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Claudia Hube-Magg (C)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Christina Möller-Koop (C)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Roland Dahlem (R)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Margit Fisch (M)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Michael Rink (M)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Silke Riechardt (S)

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Maria Christina Tsourlakis (MC)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Christian Bernreuther (C)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Sarah Minner (S)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Ronald Simon (R)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: R.Simon@uke.de.

Guido Sauter (G)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Waldemar Wilczak (W)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Till S Clauditz (TS)

Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH